• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Should cigarette smoking be allowed in some bars & restaurants?

Should cigarette smoking be allowed in some bars & restaurants?

  • Total voters
    107
Smeagol said:
I think tobacco should be classified as a harmful drug. In a perfect world I'd support outlawing it altogether. However, due to centuries of it being legal and being a realist I know that's not happening any time soon.

- No smoking in public including outdoors and establishments that are open to the public.
- No smoking in private if children are present.
- No smoking in private in inclosed structures where children will be present within ???? unless there is code certified ventilation apparatus installed.
- Smoking allowed in private homes, outdoors on private land, in private clubs not open to the public and in private vehicles (cars, boats, RVs etc.); provided second-hand smoke protections for children as described above are followed.
Click to expand...
The local community college here forbids smoking in one's own private vehicle while driving on campus. Even if alone and even if the windows are up. Is that going too far?
 
Carjosse said:
Well cigarette smoke contains many dangerous chemicals where as marijuana does not.
Click to expand...

Excuse me as I call "complete bull****" on that. It simply has not been researched as much, for obvious reasons. But it is there.

Here's another reason to "keep off the grass." Researchers in Canada report that marijuana smoke contains significantly higher levels of several toxic compounds -- including ammonia and hydrogen cyanide -- than tobacco smoke and may therefore pose similar health risks.

David Moir and colleagues note that researchers have conducted extensive studies on the chemical composition of tobacco smoke, which contains a host of toxic substances, including about 50 that can cause cancer. However, there has been relatively little research on the chemical composition of marijuana smoke.

In this new study, researchers compared marijuana smoke to tobacco smoke, using smoking machines to simulate the smoking habits of users. The scientists found that ammonia levels were 20 times higher in the marijuana smoke than in the tobacco smoke, while hydrogen cyanide, nitric oxide and certain aromatic amines occurred at levels 3-5 times higher in the marijuana smoke, they say. The finding is "important information for public health and communication of the risk related to exposure to such materials," say the researchers.
Click to expand...
Marijuana Smoke Contains Higher Levels Of Certain Toxins Than Tobacco Smoke

Marijuana smoke contains over 4000 identified chemicals, including more than 50 that are known to cause cancer (Moir et al., 2008). It contains a similar range of harmful chemicals to that of tobacco smoke (including irritants and carcinogens) (Hoffmann et al, 1975). As inhaled smoke comes into contact with airway and lung before being absorbed into the bloodstream, it is likely to affect the respiratory system (Novotny et al, 1982).
Click to expand...
Learn About Marijuana: Factsheets: Respiratory Effects of Marijuana

I can go on and on, but don't even try that "but it is harmless" bull****. Pot is known to be higher in tar, and a great many chemicals then tobacco is. So try doing some research instead of just repeating fluffy clouds and rainbows.
 
Oozlefinch said:
What about letting people decide for themselves?

Look, nobody here is really saying that all business should allow smoking, simply allow a businesses to do so if they choose to.

Or does personal choice mean that little to you?
Click to expand...

It seems that, for many, personal choice is limited to things that they like. SSM proponents are often for bans/restrictions for smoking and gun rights. Abortion ban folks are often pro gun. Ironies abound when true individual freedom is concerned.
 
iguanaman said:
You do know that they are just protecting their casinos and smokers who lose a lot of money there. Can you imagine how much money they would lose if smoking was banned in the casinos?
Click to expand...

Umm. Are we agreeing or disagreeing? What we're protecting is our single major industry. To you non-NV folks, Casinos are just another revenue format. To us, its life and death. Gambling, drinking, boobies and smoking are part of the same net function.

They are already backing off the restaurant laws and allowing smoking in some cases. Nobody likes to see their business lost.

Now, do I feel non-smokers have the right to a smoke-free meal? Yes. Should there be smoke free gaming areas in the Casino? Yes. That's good business practice.
 
Oozlefinch said:
What about letting people decide for themselves?

Look, nobody here is really saying that all business should allow smoking, simply allow a businesses to do so if they choose to.

Or does personal choice mean that little to you?
Click to expand...


I'm okay with structuring a restaurant as a private club that allows smoking. It would be a members only facility that does not allow children. Regular restaurants are considered public accommodations, subject to a host of regulation in consideration of the fact that the general public accesses them. Even though its privately owned, the nature of their community-wide accessibility places them in a type of private/public facility role.
 
radcen said:
The local community college here forbids smoking in one's own private vehicle while driving on campus. Even if alone and even if the windows are up. Is that going too far?
Click to expand...

I think so.
 
Smeagol said:
I'm okay with structuring a restaurant as a private club that allows smoking. It would be a members only facility that does not allow children. Regular restaurants are considered public accommodations, subject to a host of regulation in consideration of the fact that the general public accesses them. Even though its privately owned, the nature of their community-wide accessibility places them in a type of private/public facility role.
Click to expand...

And once again, you fail to see the entire problem. Why must it be a private club? And what is a "private club"?

And does this even work for most states?

For example, in California this would not work at all. In this state, only private clubs where the staff is entirely volunteer and makes no money other then tips can smoking be allowed.

Most states do in fact even ban smoking in private clubs. The few loopholes tend to be where the staff is unpaid volunteers for a non-profit club (like VFW and American Legion). But this is actually an exception, not the norm.

So are you willing to allow all such bans on private clubs to be removed so smoking would be allowed there?

EXEMPTIONS FROM SMOKING BANS FOR PRIVATE CLUBS
 
Smeagol said:
Especially if their choices give other people cancer or create medical expenses other people will be expected to share. (facetiously speaking)
Click to expand...

That's why cigarettes are taxed at over 100%.
 
Smeagol said:
Cars provide a vital service mankind now depends upon. Fluoride is a by product of aluminum manufacturing if I'm not mistaken, an important material. Plus science has figured out a dental health benefit for it. Tobacco does nothing except give its addicts their latest fix.

BTW: another topic but I support significantly reducing car exhaust with aggressive development of electric cars. I good friend of mine got one on lease this year and loves it. $250 a month, under $30 a month in electricity and no gas, no oil changes.
Click to expand...

So he has a coal powered car.
 
cpgrad08 said:
There should be no government regulations on smoking in a restaurant and bars. It should be on the owner of the place to determine if the establishment is smoking or non-smoking.
Click to expand...

And it is every customers right to sue the owner for exposing them to cancer causing substances.
 
iguanaman said:
And it is every customers right to sue the owner for exposing them to cancer causing substances.
Click to expand...
Welcome to California, where even Starbucks has "Cancer Warning Signs", because they sell things "proven to cause cancer".

5712225742_b349981c21_z.jpg


So let's just stop selling everything, because anything in excess can cause cancer.

And yes, sugar has been shown to cause cancer.

Excess sugar linked to cancer

Welcome to the United States of Mommy.
 
Ikari said:
So he has a coal powered car.
Click to expand...

Most people with asthma attacks never encounter coal at power stations as they are faaaaar away from most of the public. I don't ever recall seeing coal except in pictures and maybe watching trains go by. I've never seen any actually burning.
 
Phil_Osophy said:
The same reason we started freeing slaves. Its the right thing to do
Click to expand...

so you think business owners should be able to run their business as they see fit hiring who they want and serving who they want?
 
Smeagol said:
Most people with asthma attacks never encounter coal at power stations as they are faaaaar away from most of the public. I don't ever recall seeing coal except in pictures and maybe watching trains go by. I've never seen any actually burning.
Click to expand...

It's not the cleanest form of energy and causes a certain amount of global pollution, more so than gas. But till we invest in nuclear energy, we'll have to keep our dirty energy.
 
Smeagol said:
Most people with asthma attacks never encounter coal at power stations as they are faaaaar away from most of the public. I don't ever recall seeing coal except in pictures and maybe watching trains go by. I've never seen any actually burning.
Click to expand...

Coal power still accounts for 42% of the electricity in the US.

page1-776px-Electricity_by_Coal.pdf.jpg


If you live out in the Western states you're far less likely to ever see a coal plant.
 
iguanaman said:
And it is every customers right to sue the owner for exposing them to cancer causing substances.
Click to expand...

N its not their right since they aren't being force to enter the shop. They don't like smoking they can go somewhere else.
 
iguanaman said:
And it is every customers right to sue the owner for exposing them to cancer causing substances.
Click to expand...

So we should sue gas stations then since gas and gas vapors can cause cancer.
 
clownboy said:
Coal power still accounts for 42% of the electricity in the US.

page1-776px-Electricity_by_Coal.pdf.jpg


If you live out in the Western states you're far less likely to ever see a coal plant.
Click to expand...
I liked your post because it made me laugh.

And guess what state has the cities with the worst air pollution? Take a guess. I'll give you some hints, it's not in the coal belt. It's one of those yellow colored states from your img far west that starts with a "C". And it's not Colorado.
 
Last edited:
Muhammed said:
I liked your post because it made me laugh.

And what state has the worst air pollution? Take a guess. I'll give you a hint, it's not in the coal belt. It's one of those yellow colored states far west.
Click to expand...

California has all but one the cities with the record topping list in both short and long term air pollution. So I'd guess, California.
 
Smeagol said:
Cars provide a vital service mankind now depends upon. Fluoride is a by product of aluminum manufacturing if I'm not mistaken, an important material. Plus science has figured out a dental health benefit for it. Tobacco does nothing except give its addicts their latest fix.

BTW: another topic but I support significantly reducing car exhaust with aggressive development of electric cars. I good friend of mine got one on lease this year and loves it. $250 a month, under $30 a month in electricity and no gas, no oil changes.
Click to expand...

There is also evidence that flouride is bad for you as well as your teeth.

I dont believe in going into debt so i only buy cars that i can pay for in cash on the spot
 
cpgrad08 said:
So we should sue gas stations then since gas and gas vapors can cause cancer.
Click to expand...
Fail
People go to gas stations to buy gas. There are also safeguards protecting you from vapors in many states.
People go to restaurants to eat and drink not breath cancerous smoke. If you can prove you are a regular customer and unless you signed a release you can sue for damages. If a wet floor can get you sued this certainly can.
 
Last edited:
Owner's choice, IMO.



most will base their decision on what their customers want.... which is as it should be.
 
It's too bad people just didn't have the common courtesy to just smoke outside when at a restaurant anyway. I don't know why anyone would want to sit in some little smoky room to eat their dinner. It's kind of gross to smell cigarette smoke when you're trying to eat IMO.
 
ChrisL said:
It's too bad people just didn't have the common courtesy to just smoke outside when at a restaurant anyway. I don't know why anyone would want to sit in some little smoky room to eat their dinner. It's kind of gross to smell cigarette smoke when you're trying to eat IMO.
Click to expand...
To the smoker it's not a big deal because they're surrounded by smoke whether they're inside or outside.

Plus, historically, until relatively recently, smoking was so common and accepted and expected that it just wasn't a big deal. I think this mindset still relates to most present-day smokers.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom