And, as usual, you failed... so you attempt to place an e-smirk on your face to hide this failure.
Truly, the only failures are those pronouncing them in others without this being so. I won't, and cannot, take those failures away from you Cap'n, this is what you do, always do, anyhow. But does start getting tired and haggard rather quickly. Makes it rather a drudge for which I can only waste so much of my time. This is it.
Facts are facts. And facts are precisely what I posted... from Mussolini himself. I never stated that Mussolini's fascism came from the right. What I claimed was that Mussolini's fascism was anti-liberal and anti-socialist. It was, just as he stated. So, as usual, your mental gymnastics to attempt to be correct fall flat.
First of all, you were countering what I said which was exactly that Fascism comes from the left. And, just like Obama saying "If you want to keep your health care plan, you can keep it. Period", you cannot, should not, believe what those from the left tell you... they are not, in fact, facts... but often carefully manipulated lies. Obama also tries to say he is not a Socialist and yet in almost every action, including the lying, shows himself to be a major redistributionist.
Did you actually read what Mussolini said, by the way... or just take someone's word for it? You do not see the obvious statist, stated anti-individual rights stance which in the first instance all limited-government conservatism fights so constantly against, the later sentiment regarding individual rights being just what right wing conservatives fight so hard to retain:
Directly, in red, from the article you posted Mussolini* - THE DOCTRINE OF FASCISM
"There can be no conception of the State which is not fundamentally a conception of life" That is hardly an American right wing concept...it is, however, a liberal, definitely a left wing concept.
"Fascism sees in the world not only those superficial, material aspects in which man appears as an individual, standing by himself, self-centered, subject to natural law, which instinctively urges him toward a life of selfish momentary pleasure; it sees not only the individual but the nation and the country;" or... this, which builds on what I was saying in my other posts which, I am sure even tho I encouraged you to do so, you probably did not read "Anti-individualistic, the Fascist conception of life stresses the importance of the State and accepts the individual only in so far as his interests coincide with those of the State, which stands for the conscience and the universal, will of man as a historic entity. It is opposed to classical liberalism which arose as a reaction to absolutism and exhausted its historical function when the State became the expression of the conscience and will of the people. Liberalism denied the State in the name of the individual; Fascism reasserts "
Actually, the main reason the Fascists/ Nazis hated the Communists was because in pure communism, there is no hierarchy; in fascism few have the power over the many. This is such a basic distinction, I am surprised that you didn't know it.
Well, as you know, or should know, there is not now, has never been and will never be [ and I use such absolutes rarely] PURE COMMUNISM. So, there was no reason whatsoever to fear the communists for that silliness. That proposed view of what went on is almost a sixth grader's and it is absolutely absurd to propound such.
They were diametrically opposed to democracy, liberalism, and socialism. Mussolini said it himself. Just because you refuse to acknowledge it doesn't make it any less true.
And as I stated previously, just because a leftist says its true usually makes it otherwise. Mussolini may have been, probably indeed was, against socialism in the Leninist form, Benito's socialism had more of a nationalistic bent...but it was socialism and it was from the left. Deny it all you want, bang your head against the wall all you want, makes no never mind as regards what Benito really was and from where Fascism comes and what it is.
Our founders practiced a variety of philosophies ranging from the liberal to the conservative. Only someone who reads history with blinders on would not see that.
Well, I am not going to write a book here on the founding... but what we have with our Declaration of Independence and our Constitution, which are two of the main documents upon which the right, the conservatives harken back, those to which we try to preserve [ conserve ] which presupposes individual rights and limited government. And there is nobody that really posits, at least not credibly, that our founders were, and the right wing continues the tradition, what is now known as Classical Liberals. Of course, this flies directly in the face of what Mussolini was stating in the article you referenced and from which I took just a few of the representative of his thoughts, above.
Well, since you did absolutely nothing to refute a word I said (typical of you), I would suggest that you go back and read up on fascism and nazism so you have a better understanding of things. That way, I won't have to correct you... as I always do.