Yeah, and you apparently have no idea about the difference between republics and democracies. Some Americans, especially the more primitive right-wing ideologues, are famous in the entire world for their total lack of education, their small-mindedness and their partisan extremism.
Besides, I didn't mention "democracy" anywhere.
Fact is, Obama was legally elected and he legally got through his reform. When you don't acknowledge that, you kick in the face of your constitution. The Republicans now place ideology and party above the country. They will even risk extreme and severe damage to the entire country, just because they don't get their will and because they have lost the election.
When that is not prove for hating the own country and for being extremist partisan hacks, I don't know what else is.
yes i do, you see america is not democratic at all, its republican, this can be found by reading the constitution, the founders, and the federalist papers....number 40 in particular
the u.s. is a republic, with Republican government, not democratic government.
a republican government is mixed constitution or mixed government, what is mixed government?
Mixed government, also known as a mixed constitution, is a form of government that integrates elements of
democracy, aristocracy, and monarchy. In a mixed government, some issues (often defined in a constitution) are decided by the majority of the people, some other issues by few, and some other issues by a single person (also often defined in a constitution). The idea is commonly treated as an antecedent of separation of powers.
federalist 40...madison father of the u.s. constitution.
The Federalist No. 40
On the Powers of the Convention to Form a
Mixed Government Examined and Sustained
New York Packet
Friday, January 18, 1788
[James Madison]
To the People of the State of New York:
THE second point to be examined is, whether the [ constitutional ]convention were authorized to frame and propose this
mixed Constitution.
i did not state obama was not legally elected, i stated becuase he was elected and holds the upper house, does not give him a blank check to do anything he wishes.
if republicans controlled things, and the house was in the hands of democrats, and the republicans wanted to end all social programs, do you believe democratics would let the republican do as they wanted?...no.
wining elections ,does not give your party all they desire.