- Joined
- Jan 21, 2009
- Messages
- 65,981
- Reaction score
- 23,408
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
You are doing nothing but speaking and arguing emotion.
It is pointless because she is full of double speak as what she says applies to men and but not women as Henrin pointed out.
It is pointless because she speaks of responsibility of how the pregnancy came about, which is irrelevant to the fact of where we are at, that a woman gets to choose whether or not to burden herself as well as the man with the raising of a child.
She should only get to choose to burden herself, and not the other. She should not be able to choose for him.
He should be able to choose just like she does whether or not he wants that burden.
Under the system you prefer, she would not get this choice either. But that is not the way it is.
Under the current system she does get to choose, so the man should also be able to choose whether or not he wants the burden and not have it forced on him by her. That is equality.
Continue the lie all you want, but the fact is that upon birth the woman and man both have equal legal responsibility.
You have, in my opinion, the twisted view that is about the man and the woman. It's not. It's about the child once born. You absolutely OPPOSE equality of parenting obligations in relation to the child.
If the man wants the woman to have the child, certainly you agree the woman should should be able to require the man to medically undergo the same effects and risks as the pregnancy. To be injected with hormones. Required to drink impiac to make him throw up ever day. To insert an saline filled water bag in his stomach that is increasingly enlarged. Then when she goes into labor to give him drugs to cause extreme muscle retractions for hours, and finally to pull out the inflated bag thru a slit below his genitals smaller than the bag - because you believe there should be equality.
You do want equality, right?