• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Should a Man have an Absolute Right to Choose to Abort His Baby?

Should a Man have an Absolute Right to abort his baby?

  • Yes, but only during the first 20 weeks, same as a woman.

    Votes: 3 3.4%

  • Yes, but only during the initial period when a non-invasive technique works.

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • No, but he should have the right to be legally relieved of all responsibility.

    Votes: 44 49.4%

  • NO! Only the woman has this right and he remains responsible.

    Votes: 18 20.2%

  • I oppose all abortion, so neither have the right.

    Votes: 19 21.3%

  • I Don't Know.

    Votes: 5 5.6%
  • Total voters
    89
JayDubya said:
The man is a confessed murderer whatever charges the DA filed and whatever sentence they plead for.



I support your right to be blatantly sexist as evidenced by this post, but I don't want your support for inequality to be policy.
Click to expand...
Except he never confessed to murder, you almost have a point. :roll:
 
A man that believes he is entitled to some sort of control over his partner's right to choose is not pro-choice.
 
sangha said:
Can you translate that into english?
Click to expand...
My bad, I'll try to be clearer for you...

yOyoo U RequiREddd 2 $uPpoRtt Da DEcISiOnnn 2 bRakee Da law,,, caWs UUU Pro-choIceeeee an' dAt'$ WuT PrO-cHoicEE izz About. PrO-chOIcE HAs $hown Me Dis 2 B TRUE Wen DEAyy BRoke DA Lawwww 2 CoP aBorShuNs. pro-chOicE Do Nwt $uPPorT ONlii LegAl cHOices,, BUt IllEGal ChOiCesss AaS Wel. thus Pro-cHOicE haS NAhhh rEgard Fawrr $tAndArds Or EtHIx, ONLII Datt $OMeoNe Madee $Um KINdd O' CHoice $omEwHerE.


tHis MAyn maDEE Uhh ChoICeee AN' U EItHAA $UpPOrt Him OR UUU Nwt pro-choiCe.
 
Sheik Yerbuti said:
You realize that doesn't actually make a man pregnant, right?
Click to expand...
It's a figure of speech, not a clinical diagnosis. It's a social statement, not a clinical medical statement. This is consistent with unwanted pregnancy being a social problem, not a medical problem. Saying "we're pregnant" is exactly like saying "we're expecting a child" or "we're going to have a baby" or similar.

Geeze and they call me over analytical.
 
Phys251 said:
A man that believes he is entitled to some sort of control over his partner's right to choose is not pro-choice.
Click to expand...

A woman who thinks she has all the control over a man's financial life for the next 18 years just because she gets pregnant isn't pro-choice either.
 
Cephus said:
A woman who thinks she has all the control over a man's financial life for the next 18 years just because she gets pregnant isn't pro-choice either.
Click to expand...

Knew I'd get some misogynistic responses from my post. It's only a question of how many and how venomous they are.

You don't wanna be on the hook for 18 years, keep your pants zipped. Problem solved.
 
Cephus said:
A woman who thinks she has all the control over a man's financial life for the next 18 years just because she gets pregnant isn't pro-choice either.
Click to expand...

What would you suggest the legal recourse should be for a man...when there is an unintended conception?

And...

What would you suggest the legal recourse should be for a woman...when there is an unintended conception?
 
sangha said:
The constitution is more than 200 years old

Keep dodging
Click to expand...
Like marriage, abortion is not addressed in the Constitution.

It seems you're having trouble understanding the Constitution. Would you like me to translate it into hood-rat for you also?
 
Phys251 said:
Knew I'd get some misogynistic responses from my post. It's only a question of how many and how venomous they are.

You don't wanna be on the hook for 18 years, keep your pants zipped. Problem solved.
Click to expand...

If you don't want to take care of a kid on your own for 18 years, keep your legs together. Problem solved.
 
Removable Mind said:
What would you suggest the legal recourse should be for a man...when there is an unintended conception?

And...

What would you suggest the legal recourse should be for a woman...when there is an unintended conception?
Click to expand...

That's already been explained in this thread. Read it.
 
Cephus said:
If you don't want to take care of a kid on your own for 18 years, keep your legs together. Problem solved.
Click to expand...

Wow, man. What is your deal against women? If you want to have the right to choose, get some ovaries.
 
Removable Mind said:
What would you suggest the legal recourse should be for a man...when there is an unintended conception?

And...

What would you suggest the legal recourse should be for a woman...when there is an unintended conception?
Click to expand...
If they can't arrange a stable home to raise the child in, both should face child abuse charges.
 
sangha said:
If you don't want to pay child support, keep it in your pants

Problem solved
Click to expand...

Apparently Cephus believes that responsibility only applies to women, not men.
 
Phys251 said:
Wow, man. What is your deal against women? If you want to have the right to choose, get some ovaries.
Click to expand...

Funny how when you suggest women should have the same rights as men, you're progressive and pro-equality, but when you suggest that men should have the same rights as women, you're misogynistic and hateful.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom