A child is still a child. It doesn't matter what the crime was. If a five-year-old finds a gun and shoots his little sister dead we don't charge him as an adult. That's because he isn't.Other : it depends on what the crime was like murder or rape than yes they should be prosecuted as adults
A child is still a child. It doesn't matter what the crime was. If a five-year-old finds a gun and shoots his little sister dead we don't charge him as an adult. That's because he isn't.
Knowing and doing are not the same things. We don't treat teenagers like adults, because they aren't.Yes but a 15 or 16 year old Should . The difference between the a 5 year old and a 16 year old is that a 16 year old knows better than to shoot his sister.
First...Your opinion of what it "should be" is no more relevant than a pro-lifer feeling that abortion "Should be"....ie, it's not relevant, not when determining if a word is used properly. Your opinion doesn't change definitions nor make law.
Second...your statement wasn't specific to juveniles, but a broad one stating that someone sentenced to the death penalty is victim of state-sponsored murder.
So no...you're still wrong, and your link didn't actually prove otherwise in the least.
I say put them in with the general prison population where they can be passed around for a pack of smokes for the next 60 years of their lives.
If money is your concern it's much cheaper to just lock them up.death penalty for each, you just can't fix stupid and we should not waste taxpayer money trying
I don't support capital punishment except for acts of mass murder or other extreme depravity. Not sure whether this case would qualify. If my previous statement needs to be amended to account for that (and also situations like, for example, self defense), consider it amended.
Vengeance is the most barbaric form of justice.
Allow? It's not my choice. To call someone an adult at 18 is an idiotic line in the sand. It's pure unscientific crap.
We could try no guns? It was a bullet fired from a gun that killed him correct?
A government license to have children? It sounds familiar?
And the guns, that's easy. We take them all and if you show up with one we use a flamethrower on you.
Yes, and I also realize what a gun is for.You do realize that most guns are used responsibly and it is the user not the gun that is the problem?
death penalty for each, you just can't fix stupid and we should not waste taxpayer money trying
Yes, and I also realize what a gun is for.
Yes, it is because of the appeals process.
No, but it certainly kills the skeet, if you any good that is.Skeet shooting?
Yes, 15-year-old is exactly the same as an adult,only they have to go to school,A 15-year-old is expected to know not to kill some one or be a party to kill some one for no reason.they have a bedtime,But not for long. Also many adults find that they will have to go to school for their careers.and you can still spank them when they're naughty.Yes, but they are not a pubescent and is not as strictly enforced.This is the 21st Century and parents that spank their kids can be brought up on charges. Even in Oklahoma.
Yes, 15-year-old is exactly the same as an adult, only they have to go to school,they have a bedtime,and you can still spank them when they're naughty.If they miss the part about a beating versus a spanking of course they can be. But tell me, are there many adults who can still find themselves over a parent's knee, stripped of their pants and underwear, being spanked with a hairbrush? That's a real possibility and an entirely legal thing that can happen to you, when you're a child that is.This is the 21st Century and parents that spank their kids can be brought up on charges. Even in Oklahoma.
Yes, and I also realize what a gun is for.
That's how it can be used, not what it is for. I can use a claw hammer for that but that's not what it's for.Yes, in the right hands (the vast majority), it is for the protection of life and property. In the wrong hands however, it is for murder, armed robbery, and mayhem.
If they miss the part about a beating versus a spanking of course they can be. But tell me, are there many adults who can still find themselves over a parent's knee, stripped of their pants and underwear, being spanked with a hairbrush? That's a real possibility and an entirely legal thing that can happen to you, when you're a child that is.
Can be yes, but that's besides the point. We can legally spank them because they are legally children. As for spanking in public, I'd like to see a bit more of that. There are real brats out there. For that matter, I wouldn't mind seeing a few parents spanked. They aren't much better.No, if a parent publicly spanks a child they can be brought up on charges. Again no, if a child is found to have welts by a doctor or a school nurse, the parent can be brought up on charges.
No, but it certainly kills the skeet, if you any good that is.
Does skeet taste just like chicken as well?
Killing, their sole purpose and design.What are guns for then?
Killing, their sole purpose and design.
Not at all. They are very effective. It's why we send our soldiers off with them. They are good at helping kill our enemies.I guess that makes them the single most ineffective thing in the history of things then.