• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Do you support school uniforms?

What is your stance on School Uniforms?

  • Yes and the school should offer them at no extra cost.

    Votes: 20 18.3%
  • Yes and the parents should pay for them.

    Votes: 40 36.7%
  • They should be optional for students who want them

    Votes: 2 1.8%
  • There should be school uniforms for specific activities only

    Votes: 3 2.8%
  • We should leave it to the parents to decide if the school should have uniforms

    Votes: 10 9.2%
  • We should leave it at municipal/state level

    Votes: 10 9.2%
  • We shouldn't have school uniforms at all

    Votes: 24 22.0%
  • I like the current way things are.

    Votes: 5 4.6%
  • I hate uniforms

    Votes: 9 8.3%
  • I'm a potato.

    Votes: 13 11.9%

  • Total voters
    109
I think they're a great idea for most schools.

They boost integration and respect and I also think they should be free of charge for the parents initially. Each student should have 3 (random number > 1) school uniforms given by the school at the sizes of the student and if the parents want additional school uniforms, they should pay for them.

So what do you think?

Take it or leave it. I had to wear a uniform when I was in Catholic school, I didn't wear one in public school. The only real difference was that uniforms shaved a few minutes off morning routine since you didn't have to worry about picking out your cloths for the day.
 
By letter the school board decide what junior is going to wear. Let the parents be involved in what they are wearing.
Give out a comprehensive dress code during registation and enforce it.
Make the kids learn and understand rules instead of making them all out as the same.

then you have contradicted yourself
the less involved parents now find their parenting made easier
make clothing purchases conforming to the uniform/dress code
win-win
 
then you have contradicted yourself
the less involved parents now find their parenting made easier
make clothing purchases conforming to the uniform/dress code
win-win
No, parents will be more involved. Whether they want to or not, by having to go over the rules with the kids. Buying what is appropriate school clothes and understanding if junior gets in trouble for wearing prohibited clothing.
 
I had to wear a uniform through grade school and high school. I didn't like it, but really I don't have a strong opinion either way. There are pros and cons about uniforms and honestly I think they just about even each other out.
 
I wore uniforms almost my whole pre-college school life, and came to like them after hating them initially. But, just wished for more color variety (black polos please). Uniforms are good and keep school clothes shopping easy and simple. You don't have to worry about what you're going to wear other than your shoes or if it's cold, what sweater/jacket you'll throw on. Besides, schools with uniforms have dress down days when you can wear what you want. Sadly, cheap ass schools will make you pay a buck or two to do so. But, it should be a free affair.

I don't think uniforms should be free of charge, but parents should get a noteworthy discount on them if they have "large" families. Buying uniforms for 4 kids is tougher than with 2. They are literally locked in as customers in reality for years, long as their kids stay in that school.

The whole expression argument thing is being a drama queen, it's just clothes you wear to school. It does not take away from the fun of your school life. Not to mention, it helps for people that can't keep up with fashion trends. And that's possibly the greatest benefit of uniforms, you don't have to own some brand to flaunt or be labeled a loser by kids going nowhere. Granted I didn't grow up with any problem affording clothes, but I know it helped some friends of mine.

But you'll still need to watch out for Sneaker-heads.

I'm all for uniforms, never thought I'd say that several years ago. Simple ones, of course: polos, pants, shorts, and skorts, none of that sports coat/tie nonsense. Leave it up to the school staff though, let them decide.

I think its just another crutch for parents to lean on that dont want to take an active role in their childs education.
I think you have no idea what you're talking about.
 
There are many pros and cons to uniforms. Part of me always wished my school had them back in high school. I thought they were "cool." But what the parents, teachers, and students want should ultimately be the deciding factor.
 
I think they're a great idea for most schools.

They boost integration and respect and I also think they should be free of charge for the parents initially. Each student should have 3 (random number > 1) school uniforms given by the school at the sizes of the student and if the parents want additional school uniforms, they should pay for them.

So what do you think?
It's a shame that we even need to consider this but, yes.

If it makes this guy happy, it's worth it.

 
I think they're a great idea for most schools.

They boost integration and respect and I also think they should be free of charge for the parents initially. Each student should have 3 (random number > 1) school uniforms given by the school at the sizes of the student and if the parents want additional school uniforms, they should pay for them.

So what do you think?

I say yes and the parents should pay for them.Parents buy school clothes for their kids anyways, so it is not some extra cost to have them buy uniforms instead. Instead of buying your kids jeans a t-shirt you would be buying certain color khakis and certain color polo shirts.School is about educating children so that when they are adults they can get jobs adults.Part of the thing about getting a job is having to wear some sort of uniform. Kids can express themselves in their clothing when they get out of school.
 
A few years back, our school went to a more standardized dress code. We didn't implement uniforms, but we require solid one color collared shirts with no logos larger than a quarter (unless it's a school log). We allow only khakis, jeans or knee length khaki/jean shorts. I think maybe dresses might be allowed as well. Students cannot have unnatural hair coloring nor distracting hair cuts (which is determined by the administration). If your shirt is tucked in, you have to wear a belt. If your shirt is longer than your wrists when you stand up straight, you have to tuck your shirt in. No flip flops allowed. There are a few others, but that's the main idea.

Since we implemented that dress code (which was met with strong resistance, but only AFTER it passed...that's what you get in a small town, a bunch of morons), the quality of education has gone up. Test scores have risen slightly and discipline has been down each year. Obviously it's a very short time frame to measure, but it seems to be having a positive effect on our school. The students are not prohibited from expressing themselves through clothing, they just have more limited options. And many parents, even those initially opposed, have said it's been good for them, as it brings the cost of buying clothing for their children down.

It's gone very well for us.
 
I think they're a great idea for most schools.

They boost integration and respect and I also think they should be free of charge for the parents initially. Each student should have 3 (random number > 1) school uniforms given by the school at the sizes of the student and if the parents want additional school uniforms, they should pay for them.

So what do you think?

Voted for the top two, because those who can afford it should buy their children the uniforms, and those who cannot afford it should get some kind of voucher, or assistance so that they can get them and send their children off to school. Also voted potato for the lulz.
 
I think they're a great idea for most schools.

They boost integration and respect and I also think they should be free of charge for the parents initially. Each student should have 3 (random number > 1) school uniforms given by the school at the sizes of the student and if the parents want additional school uniforms, they should pay for them.

So what do you think?

I think it's a great idea. Saves parents on clothing bills...stops making fun of kids for what they're wearing...judging them by the clothes they're wearing...stops problems with dress codes. I don't know why every school doesn't do it, frankly.

For those parents who can't afford it, I think they ought to hold fundraisers at every school in the spring -- for next year. Bring in your income tax form, and if it's below a certain dollar amount, your child(ren) gets a clothing allowance for a few uniforms.
 
The one down side for schools is that there is a possibility of lawsuits or just plain protest.
 
The one down side for schools is that there is a possibility of lawsuits or just plain protest.
You would not believe the amount of noise we heard about how parents and their children were not going to abide by our dress code.

And then the first day of school came, and there was not a single form of protest. There were some students who mistakenly did not meet the code (as is to be expected on something this dramatically new), but they were willing to fix it as soon as it was pointed out. It has never been a problem.
 
I think they're a great idea for most schools.

They boost integration and respect and I also think they should be free of charge for the parents initially. Each student should have 3 (random number > 1) school uniforms given by the school at the sizes of the student and if the parents want additional school uniforms, they should pay for them.

So what do you think?

When I was a student - I never attended a school with uniforms. None of my schools had significant issues from dress and appearance problems, so I don't see what it would have changed.

As a parent of four students - for a time we were in a uniformed school district. It was a pain, actually. Some areas might be more considerate than others - but buying uniforms is far more costly because schools made it very complicated.

My kids had this:
No polyester. Boys wore a belt. Tops had to be dark blue, red, or yellow proper shirts (no t-shirts or tank tops but things like polos and button-ups). Shoes had to be only from a select few styles.

1) Not all places sold school-appropriate articles of clothing. Where they did - it was often marked much higher. I can find t-shirts for a few bucks but when it comes to uniforms, everything was between $5.00 - $12.00 a top and pants were higher.

2) Limited materials - by disallowing polyesters and knits they limited the available selection which forced me to buy more expensive articles if the cheaper one was the wrong material.

3) Shoes - dress shoes were more expensive. Aside that, kids spend time running around in the dirt and rain while at school, dress shoes are just thoughtless and inappropriate. They are ruined more quickly and much more expensive to replace.

4) Belts - my oldest was in K-2, special needs, and always needed help with his belt. It was entirely ridiculous for them to require it. They complained to me often, though they're the ones who decided that the button-shirt line had to fall in line with the pants and be topped off with a belt. The only thing missing was a tie :roll:

5) Heat - we live in Arkansas. A few months of every school year it's too hot for pants and sleeved tops (upper 90's and 100's with high humidity), yet they required them - kids were more uncomfortable.

6) Color choices and children - light colors like yellow, light blue, khaki and beige are horrible choices for school clothing. Kids go to school where they use paint, glue, and drink chocolate milk. I had a lot of clothing go to the trash because they quickly became stained and the stains would not come out - especially the paint.

We were dirt poor - and hunting down uniformed articles was a pain in the butt. It's inconsiderate to put people in that type of situation and it solved nothing. I ended up finding long sleeve shirts and clothes that were too big at good-will and then taking them in so they'd fit. Dressing kids should not be so difficult to tedious.

All in all - it cost us hundreds more every single year, created faux problems like the teachers complaining my special needs son needed too much help (tying shoes and lacing his belt), and on top of that - you still have to cloth the child in regular clothes like t-shirts and shorts so they can go out side and play.

It also increased laundry time by almost doubling the dirty clothes you had to wash each month.

All in all - it was a pointless pain in my butt and thus - I oppose them strongly. Most people are not well off nor do they have time to keep after it all.

Sometimes crap happened - like one week (we lived in an apartment) and the laundromat dryer system stopped working - we didn't have clean clothes for school, they wore regular clothes - and I was given a hard time for it.
 
Last edited:
I wore a school uniform in part of my elementary schooling and all of my highschool years. We were allowed individual expression, such as different ties for the guys and scarves for the girls, etc. and we had frequent "dress down" days for charity. It used to bother me sometimes, getting dressed up every day, but I'd say it was more conducive to learning - kept you focused on why you were there - and on the whole, it was cheaper for parents, even though the component parts of a uniform were somewhat expensive. We also had the parent association provide funding assistance for families that couldn't afford the uniform and it was done without the students knowing.
 
You would not believe the amount of noise we heard about how parents and their children were not going to abide by our dress code.

And then the first day of school came, and there was not a single form of protest. There were some students who mistakenly did not meet the code (as is to be expected on something this dramatically new), but they were willing to fix it as soon as it was pointed out. It has never been a problem.

Catholic schools here have been a cause of uproar forever last year the parents of some students sued because they couldn't wear kilts and they won. I think there was another one over hijabs (head scarves) and other things like that. Students have the right to wear kilts. The Catholic school closet to me used to only allow guys to wear pants but then one day they decided to all wear skirts and after that the staff allowed them to wear shorts. There is also numerous other lawsuits relating to uniforms though most can probably be attributed to the fact they are publicly funded Catholic as guaranteed in the Constitution.
 
Catholic schools here have been a cause of uproar forever last year the parents of some students sued because they couldn't wear kilts and they won.
I bet there is more to that story. There have been many legal cases surrounding the wearing of apparel in schools, but basically the rule is the dress cannot be too restrictive (or be restricted for political reasons), has to be applied equally to all students and dress codes have to be instituted with the intent of improving the learning atmosphere of the school.
 
I think they're a great idea for most schools.

They boost integration and respect and I also think they should be free of charge for the parents initially. Each student should have 3 (random number > 1) school uniforms given by the school at the sizes of the student and if the parents want additional school uniforms, they should pay for them.

So what do you think?

I'm very against them. People already have to dress like their bosses want them to most of their lives. There's no reason to force kids to do the same. There should be some point of their lives where they can dress as they want.
 
There should be some point of their lives where they can dress as they want.
There is. It's called before school, after school, the weekends, holidays and summer vacation.
 
Yes, kids should be forced to wear professional uniforms at school. It may build within them discipline and professionalism. Parents should also pay for the uniforms.
 
There is. It's called before school, after school, the weekends, holidays and summer vacation.
And yet somehow most of your life from 6-18 is spent in a classroom.

I'm sorry, but making some people feel better about themselves isn't a real reason. I'd like to hear a real reason we should force this on kids.

I want my kids to be individuals, not little clones.
 
And yet somehow most of your life from 6-18 is spent in a classroom.
No, it's not. At most, roughly 8 hours of your day, for 180 days a year is spent inside a classroom. That's 1/3rd of your day for roughly half the year. That's not even close to being "most of your life".

I'm sorry, but making some people feel better about themselves isn't a real reason. I'd like to hear a real reason we should force this on kids.
I've given you those reasons.

I want my kids to be individuals, not little clones.
Then feel free to let them dress however you want for the other 180 days a year they are not in school and for the other 2/3rds of a day when they do have school.
 
I bet there is more to that story. There have been many legal cases surrounding the wearing of apparel in schools, but basically the rule is the dress cannot be too restrictive (or be restricted for political reasons), has to be applied equally to all students and dress codes have to be instituted with the intent of improving the learning atmosphere of the school.

Well it was cultural issue. It was in an area where many Scottish immigrants were.
 
Yes, and the cost should be borne by the parents. The price should be capped. Parents associations should vote on which company to purchase from. This removes the selection from the education administrations to help avoid having the superintendent's brother-in-law get the contract.
 
Back
Top Bottom