- Joined
- Jul 1, 2013
- Messages
- 385
- Reaction score
- 260
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Liberal
Don't like it, don't hate it, don't particularly care much about the cover. Can't even begin to fathom why I should be offended.
A terrorist on the cover? WTF
" The cover of Rolling Stone magazine has most often been the domain of musicians, actors, comedians, and the occasional politician. But this week, the periodical has raised eyebrows by letting Boston Marathon bombing suspect Dzhokhar Tsarnaev grace the famous front.
Read more: Rolling Stone features Boston bombing suspect on cover | Fox News
A good father would be against his kids being exposed to this.
I suspect most people will have no clue who that is. Personally, I liked his second book - I never did read Las Vegas ...Right do people think Hunter S. Thompson was a music critic?
Toe that Party Line!!! :lol:Why would anyone be surprised or upset over this? Rolling Stone is clearly run by dope smoking liberals. Terrorists are probably their heroes.
So you're one of those rather odd parents that thinks hiding reality from their kids is a good thing?A good father would be against his kids being exposed to this.
Oh, this goes beyond party lines, my friend. Liberalism/Leftism is its own religion.Toe that Party Line!!! :lol:
No, he's one of those concerned parents who thinks your idea of exposure might be dangerous for his kids.So you're one of those rather odd parents that thinks hiding reality from their kids is a good thing?
A terrorist on the cover? WTF
" The cover of Rolling Stone magazine has most often been the domain of musicians, actors, comedians, and the occasional politician. But this week, the periodical has raised eyebrows by letting Boston Marathon bombing suspect Dzhokhar Tsarnaev grace the famous front.
Read more: Rolling Stone features Boston bombing suspect on cover | Fox News
A terrorist on the cover? WTF
" The cover of Rolling Stone magazine has most often been the domain of musicians, actors, comedians, and the occasional politician. But this week, the periodical has raised eyebrows by letting Boston Marathon bombing suspect Dzhokhar Tsarnaev grace the famous front.
Read more: Rolling Stone features Boston bombing suspect on cover | Fox News
Maybe they don't care because they feel magazines can put whoever they want on the cover?
The picture itself does not bother me since plenty of infamous people have been on the cover of magazines before. I am a bit irritated with the caption though:
I don't know why the media cannot seem to hold this guy accountable for his actions. They want to blame everything else except the individual.
Since I haven't read the article I can't say what their intention is, but I believe in the saying don't judge a book by its cover.
There's another saying, "a picture's worth a thousand words."
Since I haven't read the article I can't say what their intention is, but I believe in the saying don't judge a book by its cover.
A good father would be against his kids being exposed to this.
That comment by itself tells me where you stand. When people base their life on religion they seldom see anything else.Oh, this goes beyond party lines, my friend. Liberalism/Leftism is its own religion.
Momma's apron strings are more dangerous than information about the world they'll be facing some day.No, he's one of those concerned parents who thinks your idea of exposure might be dangerous for his kids.