• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Was This Acceptable? [W:110]

Was confiscating feminine hygrene products acceptable in this case?


  • Total voters
    45
Re: Was This Acceptable?

If the rumor was out there that women were going to start pelting the legislature with their tampons and pads? I think they were justified. What's the big deal?

First, do you know how much that stuff costs?? :lol: Second, what menstruating woman wants to be stuck in public without a fresh tampon. If it's a long meeting, there could have been a lot of butts showing bloody seepage.

Third, and most important of all, they had no right to confiscate personal property. They were so worried about being pelted with a tampon but didn't have any fear of being pelted by a bullet when most of the people in the room sauntered in with firearms.

This is flat loopy, and makes the legislators look like a bunch of woman-hating freakazoids. :lol:
 
Re: Was This Acceptable?

Screw Godwin and his law. Nazism is an excellent example of the point. It fits perfectly. Godwin and his so called law sucks.

When demonization is all you have left, you have already lost the argument. You frequently turn to demonization.
 
Re: Was This Acceptable?

First, there is nothing wrong with political demonization for those that deserve it. And perhaps you want to spare the Nazi's - but I will not.

Second, what does that have to do with me disproving your point with actual examples from history?

Insinuating veiled sympathy for Nazis. This is how one debates?

Second, you havent proved that in this instance that they are deserving demonization, yet you have already reached for that tool.
 
Re: Was This Acceptable?

When demonization is all you have left, you have already lost the argument. You frequently turn to demonization.

So demonizing people like the Nazi's who deserve to be demonized somehow rubs you the wrong way it seems.
 
Re: Was This Acceptable?

Insinuating veiled sympathy for Nazis. This is how one debates?

Second, you havent proved that in this instance that they are deserving demonization, yet you have already reached for that tool.

Well its either that or just your usual knee jerk impulse to nitpick because its me saying it.
 
Re: Was This Acceptable?

So demonizing people like the Nazi's who deserve to be demonized somehow rubs you the wrong way it seems.

Are you truly unaware of what you did? You just tossed up Nazis and offered up a comparison to demonization of groups here. IE Godwin's law.

Then you try to twist it to mean sympathy for Nazism. Dude, thats just a damned slimy thing to do.
 
Re: Was This Acceptable?

Are you truly unaware of what you did? You just tossed up Nazis and offered up a comparison to demonization of groups here. IE Godwin's law.

Then you try to twist it to mean sympathy for Nazism. Dude, thats just a damned slimy thing to do.

Which groups did I compare to the Nazi's who deserved demonization?
 
Re: Was This Acceptable?

Ahhh, and now we come to the part where you play dumb.

Class dismissed.

Why can't you simply answer the question. You said this and I challenged you to show which groups I compared to Nazi's

you just tossed up Nazis and offered up a comparison to demonization of groups here. IE Godwin's law.

So where is it?

Its only been a couple of pages so it should be easy peasy for you to find such evidence.... if it ever existed.
 
Re: Was This Acceptable?

Why can't you simply answer the question. You said this and I challenged you to show which groups I compared to Nazi's



So where is it?

Its only been a couple of pages so it should be easy peasy for you to find such evidence.... if it ever existed.

You implied it, then ran like you were on fire when called on it.

Black Knight - YouTube
 
Re: Was This Acceptable?

You implied it, then ran like you were on fire when called on it.

I have no idea what your silly video is suppose to mean outside of your own mind. But its time for you to put up or man up and apologize.

Why can't you simply answer the question. You said this and I challenged you to show which groups I compared to Nazi's

you just tossed up Nazis and offered up a comparison to demonization of groups here. IE Godwin's law.

So where is it?

Its only been a couple of pages so it should be easy peasy for you to find such evidence.... if it ever existed.
 
Re: Was This Acceptable?

I have no idea what your silly video is suppose to mean outside of your own mind. But its time for you to put up or man up and apologize.

Why can't you simply answer the question. You said this and I challenged you to show which groups I compared to Nazi's



So where is it?

Its only been a couple of pages so it should be easy peasy for you to find such evidence.... if it ever existed.

Oh. So you werent implying it? You just happened to bring up the nazis in the middle of a thread about republicans? How convenient.
 
Re: Was This Acceptable?

Oh. So you werent implying it? You just happened to bring up the nazis in the middle of a thread about republicans? How convenient.

The Nazi's were used as an illustration of a group which DID NOT HAVE the assumed spread of both good and bad in them as another poster asserted and claimed.

But you would have know that if you tried to reproduce the post as your evidence.

from my post 117 in which the Nazi reference was made

I strongly suspect that good and bad are NOT spread equal among all groups as history gives us some really bad groups like the Nazi's which skew that towards the evil side.

No mention of your precious Republicans.

The connections seems to have NOT been made by me but only IN YOUR OWN MIND. Otherwise you would have no trouble reproducing it and so far you have come up with nothing but your own rationalizations based on your own conclusions based on your own beliefs.
 
Re: Was This Acceptable?

The Nazi's were used as an illustration of a group which DID NOT HAVE the assumed spread of both good and bad in them as another poster asserted and claimed.

But you would have know that if you tried to reproduce the post as your evidence.

The connections seems to have NOT been made by me but only IN YOUR OWN MIND. Otherwise you would have no trouble reproducing it and so far you have come up with nothing but your own rationalizations based on your own conclusions based on your own beliefs.

And what group was he explaining had both and good and bad in it before you hamfistedly shoved Nazism into the argument?
 
Re: Was This Acceptable?

And what group was he explaining had both and good and bad in it before you hamfistedly shoved Nazism into the argument?

here it is from ecofarm

My honest hope is that one day you will learn that people are people and every group has the same distribution of good and bad.

No mention of your precious Republicans in that either.

The connections seems to be made by only you and in your own mind without any actual statement by anyone else stating what you claimed was done.

your own post 131

Are you truly unaware of what you did? You just tossed up Nazis and offered up a comparison to demonization of groups here.

YOu were caught making this up as you went along and that is why you were unable to offer any evidence of your charge against me.
 
Re: Was This Acceptable?

It's pretty unbelievable that partisans have the balls to accuse anyone of bigotry.

Anyway, if you're done repeating yourself and spamming smilies, feel free to go back to explaining to everyone how evil the right is. My honest hope is that one day you will learn that people are people and every group has the same distribution of good and bad.

here it is from ecofarm



No mention of your precious Republicans in that either.

The connections seems to be made by only you and in your own mind without any actual statement by anyone else stating what you claimed was done.

your own post 131



YOu were caught making this up as you went along and that is why you were unable to offer any evidence of your charge against me.

Bolded indicates you are wrong. Be more forthright and offer the entire quote next time instead of taking it out of context please.

Thats why you dont bring Nazis into an internet thread, it taints every argument around it, including yours. Good day.
 
Re: Was This Acceptable?

Bolded indicates you are wrong. Be more forthright and offer the entire quote next time instead of taking it out of context please.

Thats why you dont bring Nazis into an internet thread, it taints every argument around it, including yours. Good day.

News bulletin; The Nazi's were real. They existed. They are perfect examples of some evil things and they deserve to be use when it is fitting and right and in this case it was perfect. I will continue to use them no matter how much it may bother or even offend some on the far right here.

Now you were caught red handed accusing me of something and were proven to have lied about it. Now you are trying to move the goal posts to a different stadium.

I gave you the sentence with the relevant claim. The poster stated quite clearly that people are people and every group has the same distribution of good and bad. My example of the Nazi's showed this was wrong.

The previous sentence changes nothing and is ridiculous for anyone to claim that it does.

The fact is clear that you made a charge against me but could not back it up and were caught lying. So now you are trying to deflect from your own sins by this silly idea that I did not reproduce the introductory sentences WHICH DID NOT CONTAIN THE CLAIM THAT WAS DISPUTED.
 
Re: Was This Acceptable?

Now you were caught red handed accusing me of something and were proven to have lied about it. Now you are trying to move the goal posts to a different stadium.

I gave you the sentence with the relevant claim. The poster stated quite clearly that people are people and every group has the same distribution of good and bad. My example of the Nazi's showed this was wrong.

The previous sentence changes nothing and is ridiculous for anyone to claim that it does.


 
Re: Was This Acceptable?

Maybe if people would stop acting like a bunch of buffoons when they don't get their way...

Just sayin'.
 
Re: Was This Acceptable?

Let me get this straight..

By referencing castle doctrine, you are referring to an unborn child as the equivalent of a home invader?

I was referring to the "My castle my body" doctrine. What kind of a castle do women have authority over if us men have the right to do what we want with what grows in their castle?
 
Re: Was This Acceptable?

So none of the officers recall jars with feces or urine. I don't know about anyone else, but that's the sort of thing I'd remember seeing.

They just thought they'd mention that because one of them had read that it had happened in some other city.

They voted unanimously that it could have happened here.
 
Re: Was This Acceptable?

They could have thrown their shoes...did they take those as well?

How about hairbrushes, false teeth, artificial limps...you can throw all that stuff.


Yeah...they went too far.

Who ever got a concussion from being hit with a thrown tampon?
 
Re: Was This Acceptable?

I'm surprised no conservatives voted that they think it's wrong. I thought they usually didn't like infringements on personal freedom however small and minuscule it may seem or is that just the libertarians? :confused:
 
Back
Top Bottom