Procreation is a separate issue from sexual orientation. This is very basic stuff. Please educate yourself on this issue.
Truly?
I'm dubious, but to be sure, we should test the hypothesis to see if it is valid, then discuss our findings.
Now when I am tasked with such a quandary, I have found that the best process is to break down the relevant concepts to determine their fundamental traits. That way we can see if, in fact, the elements merely share commonality or if they are intrinsically bound together… which would mean that, where the elements are untethered, they become distinct.
So, to get started we must identify the issue.
Procreation/sexual orientation or Procreation -v- Sexual orientation.
Having done so, we should now define the terms.
Procreation: to produce young; to reproduce: to perpetuate the species.
Sexual: relating to the instincts, physiological processes, and activities connected with instinctive physical attraction designed to promote intimate physical contact between individuals; See: biological imperative; (The biological imperative is the perpetuation of the species)
Orientation: the determination of the relative position of something or someone
So we find that procreation is served through the sexual process, therefore the relative position of one's sexual orientation, would be intrinsic to the potential for procreation.
But, I think I understand what you're saying. It appears to be a rationalization, designed to justify the cultural normalization of the sexual abnormality, which, in this instance would be that OKA: homosexuality. Given the potential for cultural catastrophe, in doing so, I just don't understand why one would say it.
Would you be so kind as to explain?