• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

If someone only molest young boys is he gay, a pedohile or both. [W:417]

If someone only molests young boys is he gay, a pedohile, or both

  • Total voters
    68
CLAX1911 said:
It doesn't mean gay, it means bisexual. There is a difference. Its not at all like claiming independent its more like being centrist if you want to compare it to political lean.

If you are gay you are not bisexual and vise versa
Click to expand...

If you are male and have sex with other males, you are gay. Own it.
 
Rocketman said:
If you are male and have sex with other males, you are gay. Own it.
Click to expand...

gay**

/gā/Adjective(of a person, esp. a man) Homosexual.

ho·mo·sex·u·al**

/ˌhōməˈsekSHo͞oəl/Adjective(of a person) Sexually attracted to people of one's own sex.

bi·sex·u·al**

/bīˈsekSHo͞oəl/AdjectiveSexually attracted to both men and women.NounA person who is sexually attracted to both men and women.
 
CLAX1911 said:
gay**

/gā/Adjective(of a person, esp. a man) Homosexual.

ho·mo·sex·u·al**

/ˌhōməˈsekSHo͞oəl/Adjective(of a person) Sexually attracted to people of one's own sex.
Click to expand...

So you aren't attracted to men?
 
CLAX1911 said:
bi·sex·u·al**

/bīˈsekSHo͞oəl/AdjectiveSexually attracted to both men and women.NounA person who is sexually attracted to both men and women.
Click to expand...

If you are attracted to men you are gay
 
CLAX1911 said:
No, that is bisexual.

bi·sex·u·al**

/bīˈsekSHo͞oəl/AdjectiveSexually attracted to both men and women.NounA person who is sexually attracted to both men and women.
Click to expand...

You are gay
 
CLAX1911 said:
It doesn't mean gay, it means bisexual. There is a difference. Its not at all like claiming independent its more like being centrist if you want to compare it to political lean.

If you are gay you are not bisexual and vise versa
Click to expand...

All of which falls under the general category of 'deviant', which is to say that such deviates from the sexual norm, established by the biological design; OKA: Sexual abnormality.

There is a tendency today, to distract the public from the relevant fundamentals, through the tedious slicing of the issues into infinite sub-categories. Which of course was the goal of the most notorious of Pedophiles, one Alfred Kinsey… a FLAMING sexual deviant of the old "Eugenics" school of early Progressivism (The label preferred by US advocates of fascism OKA: National Socialism…). Kinsey spent many years subjecting children, aging from infant through adolescence, to all manner of sexual 'testing' in the name of "SCIENCE!". One of the more pathetic instances was his desire to 'Learn' whether or not an infant could achieve an orgasm.

This monster was the founder of 'The Kensey Institute', which one will inevitably find at the forefront of all 'studies' which have lead the way for the normalization of sexual abnormality…
 
AmericanbyChoic said:
All of which falls under the general category of 'deviant', which is to say that such deviates from the sexual norm, established by the biological design; OKA: Sexual abnormality.

There is a tendency today, to distract the public from the relevant fundamentals, through the tedious slicing of the issues into infinite sub-categories. Which of course was the goal of the most notorious of Pedophiles, one Alfred Kinsey… a FLAMING sexual deviant of the old "Eugenics" school of early Progressivism (The label preferred by US advocates of fascism OKA: National Socialism…). Kinsey spent many years subjecting children, aging from infant through adolescence, to all manner of sexual 'testing' in the name of "SCIENCE!". One of the more pathetic instances was his desire to 'Learn' whether or not an infant could achieve an orgasm.

This monster was the founder of 'The Kensey Institute', which one will inevitably find at the forefront of all 'studies' which have lead the way for the normalization of sexual abnormality…
Click to expand...

If it is normalized it isn't abnormal anymore.

Your opinion about deviance is of no consequence. Homosexuality and bisexuality aren't deviant.

As far as Kinsey goes, I an not familiar with his personal life.
 
AmericanbyChoic said:
All of which falls under the general category of 'deviant', which is to say that such deviates from the sexual norm, established by the biological design; OKA: Sexual abnormality.
Click to expand...
Biological design, the bodies of human beings are not designed, they occur naturally. The body isn't designed to wear a prophylactic during intercourse so any firm of that is deviance, it isn't designed to use oral organs to simulate sexual organs, so that is all deviance.

Besides the only people that call it deviance are the closet case self haters that crusade against it normally because they hate that part of themselves. They are slowly becoming a laughing stock while homosexuality is becoming normalized and legitimized. Thus making it not deviant or abnormal.
AmericanbyChoic said:
There is a tendency today, to distract the public from the relevant fundamentals, through the tedious slicing of the issues into infinite sub-categories.
Click to expand...
So because you choose not to educate yourself on sexuality all research is pointless? Either through your own laziness our sin other personal block you have be it prejudice, fear of your own sexual desires, or just plain old fear of what is unlike you, the whole world should be more stupid? No, err are leaving that kind of ignorant crap behind. You either need to catch up or be left behind. Throw backs never do well.
 
CLAX1911 said:
Biological design, the bodies of human beings are not designed, they occur naturally.
Click to expand...

The net result being otherwise known as 'the design'.

The body isn't designed to wear a prophylactic during intercourse so any firm of that is deviance, it isn't designed to use oral organs to simulate sexual organs, so that is all deviance.
Click to expand...

False… If the design did not provide for stimulation, the design would not provide for such. Grab a clue…

The biological design serves the function of perpetuation of the species… . It's all about ins and out sport. Penis, serves as an out. The Anus serves as an out. See the problem?

Oral stimulation serves the means of … (wait for it) STIMULATION… and where that function serves the biological design (See: Above) it serves nature.

Homosexuality may also serve nature. Sadly, it serves reason that where homosexuality reduces the likelihood for procreation, then it follows that such would serve nature where there exist untenable stresses on the population. (see: The Population Bomb. Ehrlich cir. 1968-70)

Where such would be the case, prolific increases in homosexuality would be a harbinger of potential catastrophe… therefore normalizing such can only promote the potential for catastrophe… (in case ya missed it: THAT's BAD! Meaning the normalization of sexual abnormality is a BAD IDEA!)

Besides the only people that call it deviance are the closet case self haters that crusade against it normally because they hate that part of themselves.
Click to expand...

HYSTERICAL! On every level and in every sense of the word.

It is an indisputable FACT that homosexuality deviates from the biological design of the species… If EVERY SINGLE HUMAN BEING ON THE PLANET BELIEVED TO THE CORE OF THEIR SOLE THAT IT DID NOT, that would in NO WAY alter the FACT that it does. Understand, there is absolutely NO CORRELATION between the number of people that believe a given position and the potential that the given position is valid and or true.

I hope that helps…
 
CLAX1911 said:
If it is normalized it isn't abnormal anymore.
Click to expand...

ROFLMNAO!

Now that is ADORABLE!

You're conflating normality with perceptions of normality.


Your opinion about deviance is of no consequence. [/qoute]

That's true… what IS a consequence is that it is an incontrovertible FACT, that the species is designed design provides for the perpetuation of the species… Homosexuality serves the antithesis of the design of human biology. Therefore, Homosexuality DEVIATES from the normality which is established BY the biological design.

Homosexuality and bisexuality aren't deviant.
Click to expand...
Patently and as demonstrated above: Hysterically> false…

As far as Kinsey goes, I an not familiar with his personal life.
Click to expand...

I am not surprised… And only YOU can fix that… But FTR: it was his professional life that caused the problem.
Click to expand...
 
AmericanbyChoic said:
ROFLMNAO!

Now that is ADORABLE!

You're conflating normality with perceptions of normality.


Your opinion about deviance is of no consequence. [/qoute]

That's true… what IS a consequence is that it is an incontrovertible FACT, that the species is designed design provides for the perpetuation of the species… Homosexuality serves the antithesis of the design of human biology. Therefore, Homosexuality DEVIATES from the normality which is established BY the biological design.

Patently and as demonstrated above: Hysterically> false…



I am not surprised… And only YOU can fix that… But FTR: it was his professional life that caused the problem.
Click to expand...



Correct. And what those of us higher up on the food chain need to grasp is what to do with all that vast "flock" of normalcy...............
Click to expand...
 
AmericanbyChoic said:
That's true… what IS a consequence is that it is an incontrovertible FACT, that the species is designed design provides for the perpetuation of the species… Homosexuality serves the antithesis of the design of human biology. Therefore, Homosexuality DEVIATES from the normality which is established BY the biological design.
Click to expand...

The same could be said for condoms and the pill as well, as both prevent "perpetuation of the species".
 
AmericanbyChoic said:
All of which falls under the general category of 'deviant', which is to say that such deviates from the sexual norm, established by the biological design; OKA: Sexual abnormality.

There is a tendency today, to distract the public from the relevant fundamentals, through the tedious slicing of the issues into infinite sub-categories. Which of course was the goal of the most notorious of Pedophiles, one Alfred Kinsey… a FLAMING sexual deviant of the old "Eugenics" school of early Progressivism (The label preferred by US advocates of fascism OKA: National Socialism…). Kinsey spent many years subjecting children, aging from infant through adolescence, to all manner of sexual 'testing' in the name of "SCIENCE!". One of the more pathetic instances was his desire to 'Learn' whether or not an infant could achieve an orgasm.

This monster was the founder of 'The Kensey Institute', which one will inevitably find at the forefront of all 'studies' which have lead the way for the normalization of sexual abnormality…
Click to expand...
Is white skin abnormal?
 
Rocketman said:
the fact is excuses are not proof, there are no excuses for deviant behavior
Click to expand...

The fact is that you have been proven to not know what you are talking about countless times. Define the word "deviant".
 
Rocketman said:
Scientific fact backs the earth is round, politically correct opinion is the only thing back your opinions
Click to expand...

Scientific fact backs that homosexuality is not a disorder. Your denial is akin to you believing the earth is flat.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom