• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

If someone only molest young boys is he gay, a pedohile or both. [W:417]

If someone only molests young boys is he gay, a pedohile, or both


  • Total voters
    68
A closeted gay is still a gay.

Gay is an identity, the closet doesn't matter.

If someone doesn't identify as gay, they aren't gay. Take me for example. I have been in a monogamous relationship with a man for ten years I am also a man. I am not gay because I identify as bi.
 
Girls are more likely to say something.

Navy's entire premise is delusional. Oh the shock!

In his little world all pedophiles are gay, therefore all gays are pedophiles.

Nevermind little girls are also abused. So to his line of thinking are all heterosexuals pedophiles?

There is no end to the pretzel logic he applies daily.
 
Whereas your opinion is rooted in bigotry and ignorance.

translated, you know it is deviant behavior and could nlt think of anything else to say
 
Gay is an identity, the closet doesn't matter.

If someone doesn't identify as gay, they aren't gay. Take me for example. I have been in a monogamous relationship with a man for ten years I am also a man. I am not gay because I identify as bi.

you are still gay
 
No I am not, i am bisexual, i am an expert on my own sexuality you are not. You have no right to tell me who I am.

you are gay, denial does not change that
 
Gay is an identity, the closet doesn't matter.

If someone doesn't identify as gay, they aren't gay. Take me for example. I have been in a monogamous relationship with a man for ten years I am also a man. I am not gay because I identify as bi.
I get your point, but I'm not sure I fully agree. There are guys who identify as straight but who are really gay. Like me in the past.
 
There is a difference. If you are really gay then you aren't straight.
Right. So a closeted gay is still gay, even if he identifies as straight. Just identifying as something doesn't necessarily mean that you are that something. We can generally assume people who identify as gay or bisexual are in fact gay or bisexual, however, because there aren't any social pressures that would make a straight person want to lie about being straight.
 
4th option

he is navigator :lol:
 
Right. So a closeted gay is still gay, even if he identifies as straight. Just identifying as something doesn't necessarily mean that you are that something. We can generally assume people who identify as gay or bisexual are in fact gay or bisexual, however, because there aren't any social pressures that would make a straight person want to lie about being straight.

Agreed
 
"If someone only molest young boys is he gay, a pedohile or both."[sic]

If the 'someone' is male and is molesting young boys, then he is undeniably homosexual… Which is of course a sexual orientation which deviates from the biological norm… thus is sexually abnormal, on that score alone. That its sexual cravings requires taught skin and fresh features is just a deeper version of a similar malady.

A large percentage, if not most pedophiles are not born child molesters. They're grown through the obsession with pornography, wherein the host of adult fare has been normalized; meaning they no longer find arousal through such and, as a result are left to the grand taboo of children.

But to answer the question, yes… males seeking sexual gratification with other males are deviant; sexually abnormal.
 
If the 'someone' is male and is molesting young boys, then he is undeniably homosexual… Which is of course a sexual orientation which deviates from the biological norm… thus is sexually abnormal, on that score alone. That its sexual cravings requires taught skin and fresh features is just a deeper version of a similar malady.

A large percentage, if not most pedophiles are not born child molesters. They're grown through the obsession with pornography, wherein the host of adult fare has been normalized; meaning they no longer find arousal through such and, as a result are left to the grand taboo of children.

But to answer the question, yes… males seeking sexual gratification with other males are deviant; sexually abnormal.

so many catholic priests are gay

but they hate gays too

hehe
 
so many catholic priests are gay

but they hate gays too

hehe


Yeah… The Catholics went through a period, wherein they embraced the normalization of sexual abnormality. That's very true.

And it's really worked out great for 'em.

What has always tickled me about that, is how the Catholics are said to be the problem and not the sexual abnormality.

Which is why I'm SO happy that the Boy Scouts of America decided to jump on board the Normalization of Sexual Abnormality ban wagon. The next generation will be helped (by you know who) to understand that THE PROBLEM with the looming spike in molestation of adolescent Scouts, is the Organization, and not that the Organization lowered its standards to accommodate the sexually abnormal … but such is how legitimacy has always been crippled and THAT is the goal, despite the errant conventional wisdom, which holds that the goal is tolerance and understanding.

In truth, there is no good that can, even potentially, come from normalizing natural harbingers of pending chaos, calamity and catastrophe… thus such is NEVER TO BE TOLERATED.

But I suppose we're due for nature to provide the species with yet ANOTHER demonstration of what happens when a culture becomes so prosperous that it tolerates the mouthy malcontents among children and fools.
 
Yeah… The Catholics went through a period, wherein they embraced the normalization of sexual abnormality. That's very true.

And it's really worked out great for 'em.

What has always tickled me about that, is how the Catholics are said to be the problem and not the sexual abnormality.

Which is why I'm SO happy that the Boy Scouts of America decided to jump on board the Normalization of Sexual Abnormality ban wagon. The next generation will be helped (by you know who) to understand that THE PROBLEM with the looming spike in molestation of adolescent Scouts, is the Organization, and not that the Organization lowered its standards to accommodate the sexually abnormal … but such is how legitimacy has always been crippled and THAT is the goal, despite the errant conventional wisdom, which holds that the goal is tolerance and understanding.

In truth, there is no good that can, even potentially, come from normalizing natural harbingers of pending chaos, calamity and catastrophe… thus such is NEVER TO BE TOLERATED.

But I suppose we're due for nature to provide the species with yet ANOTHER demonstration of what happens when a culture becomes so prosperous that it tolerates the mouthy malcontents among children and fools.

ok l will ask you something

which one is worse ?

homosexuality or pedohilia ?
 
You are still gay. Bi-sexual is like claiming to be independent, it doesn't really mean anything

It doesn't mean gay, it means bisexual. There is a difference. Its not at all like claiming independent its more like being centrist if you want to compare it to political lean.

If you are gay you are not bisexual and vise versa
 
Back
Top Bottom