- Joined
- Jul 1, 2011
- Messages
- 67,218
- Reaction score
- 28,530
- Location
- Lower Hudson Valley, NY
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
You've been putting out the vibe, and never even realized it.
I don't see how :shrug:
You've been putting out the vibe, and never even realized it.
It takes a helluva lot of courage to just put yourself out there without waxing first.I don't see how :shrug:
What do you think?
They're gay as they're having gay sex and attracted to a male.
They are also a sick organism with deep emotional and mental issues. Honestly such types truly need to have their minds wiped because you cannot "fix" a biological mental disease in someone. You can drug them but that doesn't fix it, it treats it. Mentally sick people will always be mentally sick.
Medications simply subdue their symptoms and manic episodes, they do not fix them and cannot. You can always trigger someone with these mental diseases because they're never truly "fixed" even when on medication. That's why you cannot truly help a pedophile. It's a biological issue. The only way to truly "fix" them would be to wipe their mind or physically operate on them.
I don't know, I think by the very definition of sexually molesting the same gender, regardless of age, will make you at a minimum bisexual.
If it's a kid, he's also a pedophile.
I'm not saying there's a correlation between homosexuality and pedophilia, but let's call a spade a spade. Sexual attraction to the same gender is homosexuality, regardless of the age.
With just this much information I would say by definition both. But I merely posted to keep up with where NP takes it. Funny how much some people think about this huh?
I said that because if a guy has some sort of sex with another guy, by definition it is homosexual sex. Just like if your girlfriend is a party bi...oooops got off track there for a second.
He is certainly a pedophile. Can't say for certain if he is gay or not. Maybe, maybe not. Why do you ask, Navy? Are you trying to classify your own behavior?
Going strictly off of the question posed by the OP, I think the answer would be "both."
An individual matching the description provided could be thought of as being a gay pedophile.
He is probably very gay right up until the police arrest him for being a homosexual pedophile.
Male to male=gay, undeclared is no excuse and does not change the fact, Catholic priest that molest young boys are gay
Male to male=gay, undeclared is no excuse and does not change the fact, Catholic priest that molest young boys are gay
I don't see how :shrug:
He is probably very gay right up until the police arrest him for being a homosexual pedophile.
As I've never known any paedophiles (thank god), the closest thing to a documentary I've seen is The Woodsman starring Kevin Bacon in his creepiest role ever. It features a child molester who focuses exclusively on little girls, and in a bizarre twist finds an adversary in another child molester who focuses exclusively on little boys. I have absolutely no idea how accurate the movie is with regards to paedophiles.
It's a good movie, but I do not suggest it for date night.
They're gay as they're having gay sex and attracted to a male.
They are also a sick organism with deep emotional and mental issues. Honestly such types truly need to have their minds wiped because you cannot "fix" a biological mental disease in someone. You can drug them but that doesn't fix it, it treats it. Mentally sick people will always be mentally sick.
Medications simply subdue their symptoms and manic episodes, they do not fix them and cannot. You can always trigger someone with these mental diseases because they're never truly "fixed" even when on medication. That's why you cannot truly help a pedophile. It's a biological issue. The only way to truly "fix" them would be to wipe their mind or physically operate on them.
Actually, picking that photo shows huge hypocrisy in terms of women can wear anything but men "who don't dress like men" are treated like freaks by most people. Sad.
What do you think?
If you haven't learned anything by now with your constant, single-minded focus on gay people, there's a damn good chance that you'll never learn.
Agreed.
I think we should start a new poll:
If someone cannot stop talking about homosexuality - often in a negative light - do you think he is either gay or homophobic or both?
Notice there is no 'none of the above' option.
Wrong.
To add, its much more likely that an adult male would be allowed to be alone with boys than girls. Locker rooms, for example.Being a pedophile has nothing to do with gender and everything to do with power and availability. So the whole "a guy that rapes a boy is really just a gay pedophile" is BS. In our society it is most often the case that boys will be left alone with people far more than girls so boys are easier pickings than girls.
Being a pedophile has nothing to do with gender and everything to do with power and availability. So the whole "a guy that rapes a boy is really just a gay pedophile" is BS. In our society it is most often the case that boys will be left alone with people far more than girls so boys are easier pickings than girls.
I don't know, I think by the very definition of sexually molesting the same gender, regardless of age, will make you at a minimum bisexual.
If it's a kid, he's also a pedophile.
I'm not saying there's a correlation between homosexuality and pedophilia, but let's call a spade a spade. Sexual attraction to the same gender is homosexuality, regardless of the age.
I'm definitely with Captain Courtesy on this, probably for a different reason. I think pedophilia is a sexual orientation in and of itself.
Which dictionary should we use ?
All I was pointing out, Redress should have used someone else as a reliable source than Dr. Herek. It's like having Senator Feinstein giving a class on the nomenclature of the M-16 rifle.
Herek studies are more than bias but have a radical political agenda. Herek is a leftist hate monger. His job is to indocernate young adults that same sex sodomy just isn't fun and safe but completely normal. Herek believes that heterosexuals are mentally sick and abnormal. He even goes as far as playing the race card. Herek still hasn't recovered that back in 2008 that just as many blacks in California voted for Prop 8 as there were who voted for Obama. It's probably because most blacks couldn't afford to attend UC Davis to be indocernated by Dr. Merek.
Because Merek is just not a homosexual activist with a leftist political agenda but is one of those white beard scratching liberals who just not changes the meanings of words to further a political agenda but also creates new words with new definitions the further his own radical political agenda.
Beyond Homophobia » About Dr. Herek
Sexual Prejudice: Understanding Homophobia and Heterosexism (You'll notice that Herek uses the same dictionary when it furthers his agenda.)
I can't seem to find the article where Merek wants to change the definition of homophobia. Lets put it this way, Merek is just a radical gay leftist comparable to the hate monger Morris Dees.
Excerpt:
>" Homophobia is an etymologically incorrect term which most directly denotes "an unreasoning fear of or antipathy toward homosexuals and homosexuality",[2] but it also includes a fear of increased political and social power of homosexuals in advancing their agenda. The term is used regularly by activists to describe several kinds of people, which may or may not match the actual definition of "fear of homosexuals and homosexuality". The recipients of the homophobia label include those who feel uncomfortable around homosexuals, those who reveal that they oppose "gays," and even those who may privately support homosexuality but who fail to publicly support homosexuals when called upon to do so.[3]
Conservative Christians and other people who strongly object to homosexuality often take offense at this term, which had led to the use of the term heterophobia to describe those who manifest an antipathy to those who uphold heterosexuality as normative or exclusively valid. While the term phobia is an irrational fear of something, nobody is afraid of homosexuals, and nobody fears contracting homosexuality. That is in contrast to heterophobia, whose existence has been documented..."< Homophobia - Conservapedia
Male to male=gay, undeclared is no excuse and does not change the fact, Catholic priest that molest young boys are gay
You actually don't know what you are talking about. Herek's study is a META-ANALYSIS of other studies. Most of those studies are peer reviewed, reliable, and credible. I've read most of them. YOUR source attempted to erroneously assign sexual orientation is a dishonest way, fitting with the sources anti-gay agenda. There was absolutely nothing credible written there.