• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Creepy Ass Cracker.... Racist or no? [W:329/550]

Is the phrase "Creepy Ass Cracker" Racist?

  • Yes!

    Votes: 49 62.8%
  • No!

    Votes: 14 17.9%
  • I blame Whitey!

    Votes: 8 10.3%
  • Other

    Votes: 7 9.0%

  • Total voters
    78
Iam in my 50s iam white and been discriminated many times for opportunities because I was not a certain race.
But every time I turned around and walked way and sought opportunity else where.

Ever say to me that the state does not discriminate against whites, I have experienced it as well as my mother

Ok the "down trodden black man" thing never worked with me, so you know I am not going to take it from a white man. You play the cards you are delt and move on. The down trodden white man thing just cracks me up.
 
All I know is that his tank got shot by friendly fire (supposedly on accident, as specified) and his crew got ****ed up. Then, he got it stuck in a ditch and had to destroy it. Then he walked to enemy lines and surrendered. That's one pathetic son of a bitch.

His unit killed 3000 enemy tanks. He was awesome to say the least. Great TC through and through. He surrendered because his unit had no tanks left. At the time they were down to 6 or less with no replacements. He made the right choice.

He went on to be a fire chief and mayor of some town. He died in 2009. So yea, he made the right choice.
 
All I know is that his tank got shot by friendly fire (supposedly on accident, as specified) and his crew got ****ed up. Then, he got it stuck in a ditch and had to destroy it. Then he walked to enemy lines and surrendered. That's one pathetic son of a bitch.
I see a panzer ace.....right........could it be rage on your part.
 
Ok the "down trodden black man" thing never worked with me, so you know I am not going to take it from a white man. You play the cards you are delt and move on. The down trodden white man thing just cracks me up.
That's my point ,you move on, and don't cry racism and discrimination when someone does not like or hire you
 
His unit killed 3000 enemy tanks. He was awesome to say the least. Great TC through and through. He surrendered because his unit had no tanks left. At the time they were down to 6 or less with no replacements. He made the right choice.

It seems he vastly over-extended his logistics and proceeded to multi-fail until trudging into the arms of the enemy.
 
I see a panzer ace.....right........could it be rage on your part.

In a bad ass Panther G no less. That 75LL was one mean gun in open terrain. Too bad the Panther lost any advantage in city fighting. That anemic side armor, ugh.
 
It seems he vastly over-extended his logistics and proceeded to multi-fail until trudging into the arms of the enemy.

It was 1945 Eco, they had no logistics left. No supplies, no replacements and no fuel. It was the end and they knew it.

Huge difference between bravery and stupidity, lol.

Anyway we are derailing again enough about Ernst.
 
It was 1945 Eco, they had no logistics left. No supplies, no replacements and no fuel. It was the end and they knew it.

Yeah, ok, this thread is now thoroughly ridiculous.
 
It was 1945 Eco, they had no logistics left. No supplies, no replacements and no fuel. It was the end and they knew it.

Huge difference between bravery and stupidity, lol.

Anyway we are derailing again enough about Ernst.
correct?...;)
 
Yeah, ok, this thread is now thoroughly ridiculous.

Riiiiight. Yea that's exactly what happened Mr. does not know his WWII history.

No matter enough about Ernst!
 
Riiiiight. Yea that's exactly what happened Mr. does not know his WWII history.

No matter enough about Ernst!

The "creepy ass cracker" thread has gone to the heights of the ivory tower, kicking and screaming against all ignorance and false equivalence, and now rests with a black guy defending the awesomeness of a Nazi (not the poster, of course, the historical figure).

That's it, I give up.
 
The "creepy ass cracker" thread has gone to the heights of the ivory tower, kicking and screaming against all ignorance and false equation, and now rests with a black guy defending the awesomeness of a Nazi (not the poster, of course, the historical figure).

That's it, I give up.

You are the one that attacked his name. I just happen to know my history when it comes to WWII. I can tell you about Patton and Ike if you like?

You definition is still no good. You are trying to redefine a word to fit your own limited world view and just ignore the accepted definition. You could not even really counter what was thrown at you about that distinction and went off into the guys username.

Don't blame us for your own mistakes and bad argument.
 
You definition is still no good. You are trying to redefine a word to fit your own limited world view and just ignore the accepted definition. You could not even really counter what was thrown at about that distinction and went off into the guys user name.

Don't blame us for your own mistakes and bad argument.

That's false. The sociological understanding of racism, and what it means beyond racial bigotry, flew past you (and pretty much everyone else - no surprise).

If you cannot appreciate the difference between individual bigotry and bigotry with societal impacts (an ISM), well... who am I to teach you grad school sociology.
 
That's false. The sociological understanding of racism, and what it means beyond racial bigotry, flew past you (and pretty much everyone else - no surprise).

Wait, so you did not say...

It's a racial slur but not racist. Racism requires institutional backing.

If you cannot appreciate the difference between individual bigotry and bigotry with societal impacts (an ISM), well... who am I to teach you grad school sociology.

Your own words say different.
 
Wait, so you did not say...

Your own words say different.

There's no contradiction there. You haven't followed the argument at all. Apparently, you don't believe in sociological arguments, so I'm not surprised.
 
This thread was thoroughly ridiculous 2 hours ago

I don't think we really jumped the shark until a black guy was defending an historical Nazi (because he was a good tanker) and denying that racism is an obstacle for blacks in America (but only as an aside to rejecting a claim of 'anti-white discrimination'). At that point, the "creepy ass cracker" thread hit some sort of trifecta or critical mass of absurd.
 
just the other day the USSC ruled that the affirmative action case of Texas was in its ruling wrong, and send it back to the state.

the issue was a white student denied admission to a state college becuase she was white....the college admitted it discriminated against her....as they put it......"we did it for the greater good"

discrimination comes from all sides.

Wrong.

Texas didn't admit that they denied her because of her race at all.

Texas used a variety of tools that ended up denying her. One small portion of that is race.

She didn't make it because her SAT scores were mediocre; her GPA was good (not great); and of the people with equal qualifications behind her that were denied included many other white folk. It also included many minorities. And of the people that got in ahead of her with lower scores - 75% of them were white.

So...

A Colorblind Constitution: What Abigail Fisher’s Affirmative Action Case Is Really About - ProPublica

The facts... they say something different.
 
Wrong.

Texas didn't admit that they denied her because of her race at all.

Texas used a variety of tools that ended up denying her. One small portion of that is race.

She didn't make it because her SAT scores were mediocre; her GPA was good (not great); and of the people with equal qualifications behind her that were denied included many other white folk. It also included many minorities. And of the people that got in ahead of her with lower scores - 75% of them were white.

So...

A Colorblind Constitution: What Abigail Fisher’s Affirmative Action Case Is Really About - ProPublica

The facts... they say something different.
well I listened to the details of the case explained by a constutional judge, and he stated clearly they discrminated ,and they knew they did.
 
well I listened to the details of the case explained by a constutional judge, and he stated clearly they discrminated ,and they knew they did.

And I read the case. They said that race was about 1/3 of the deciding factor (see the link) of the two areas they make decisions on.
 
...said the throw-back guerrilla with the pronounced underbite and a neck wider than her head.

Careful, you might cut yourself on all that edge
 
Back
Top Bottom