- Joined
- Jan 25, 2012
- Messages
- 10,033
- Reaction score
- 3,905
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
You don't know to what you responded?!? :lol:Hmm?? What was the other part?
You don't know to what you responded?!? :lol:Hmm?? What was the other part?
You don't know to what you responded?!? :lol:
I'm the one who has given evidence. You hid from it. Played games but did not address it at all.
You just hid behind a court case.
That spelled out the harm. It's called evidence.
Yet they didn't prove their case. :shrug:
What are you talking about? You really should read it. They upheld the ruling that there was harm, and that the Constitution was not violated.
I have read it. They didn't prove anything.
Not what the court said. Again, you just can't address it. You have nothing.
Oh, you've definitely cost me money if I stop to eat and you won't serve me when your business is clearly OTTP.What else is there? Property?
Oh, you've definitely cost me money if I stop to eat and you won't serve me when your business is clearly OTTP.
If you're showing OTTP then you've falsely advertised. I came expecting OTTP and didn't get that.How am I costing you money?? You came to my business on your own free will, so you cost yourself money.
I assume you meant they COULD BE?
I'm not here for your anarchist fantasies.
In the real world there are obvious safety hazards with increased traffic flow and probable maintenance issues as well. It would not be reasonable to limit each individual house in a subdivision to X number of cars per year (how would one keep track?) and certainly a daily limit would be ridiculous. It may not be an issue for a large family's (great) grandparents to have a twice a year get together where there are maybe 40 people (incl children/grandchildren/etc) but having that much extra traffic every single day would be cause for concern, let alone how much traffic an average business generates.
It's easy to see why in your anarchist world - they loose other customers because of poor service.
Tell that to the survivors in Texas. Tell me, how much money does it take to replace a child, a mother, or a father? Should we execute all the owners? That might be enough deterrence to keep future business owners from creating or allowing a lethal threat like that.
See the court cases ...
Oh, you've definitely cost me money if I stop to eat and you won't serve me when your business is clearly OTTP.
Otherwise, you can open a private club and serve whoever you want, or not as you see fit.
Present their argument if you want.
If I drive 10 miles on the promise you made to serve me (OTTP) and you don't, then you have indeed harmed me just as much as if you'd stuck your hand in my pocket and taken my money. This is why false and misleading advertising is illegal.Nope. The person has not damaged your body or your property in any way.
Such a charter should be binding on all its signatories and nobody else.
If I drive 10 miles on the promise you made to serve me (OTTP) and you don't, then you have indeed harmed me just as much as if you'd stuck your hand in my pocket and taken my money. This is why false and misleading advertising is illegal.
It could just as easily have been a 250 mile trip for parts (500 round trip) but it doesn't matter. The point is it wouldn't have happened had you not been promising something you didn't deliver.How are you harmed because you drive ten miles to a business that refuses to serve you? Wasted gas?
If I drive 10 miles on the promise you made to serve me (OTTP) and you don't, then you have indeed harmed me just as much as if you'd stuck your hand in my pocket and taken my money. This is why false and misleading advertising is illegal.
You've cost me money, plain and simple. May as well have reached into my pocket and took it for yourself, especially if you happen to own a gas station, too. :roll:I disagree that I have damaged your body or your property.
A quick Google search can save you that sort of inconvenience.
You've cost me money, plain and simple. May as well have reached into my pocket and took it for yourself, especially if you happen to own a gas station, too. :roll:
So lying about your services is perfectly acceptable?!? :lamo I'm glad I live in the Real World instead of your Fantasy Land!
You are if you're advertising as OTTP. Obviously, if you discriminate you're not OTTP or I wouldn't have wasted my time and money. Like I said, open a private (non-OTTP) business and be a bigot all you want. If you're OTTP then serve me as you promised to do.I disagree. The store owner did not damage your body or any of your property. The fact that you decided to drive somewhere and ask to do business when you get there is your problem.
No, lying is not acceptable. Who is lying?
You are if you're advertising as OTTP. Obviously you're not OTTP or I wouldn't have wasted my time and money. Like I said, open a privater business and be a bigot all you want. If you're OTTP then serve me as you promised to do.