- Joined
- Oct 22, 2012
- Messages
- 32,516
- Reaction score
- 5,321
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
The National Labor Relations Board has nothing to do with this discussion so the definition used for that subsection is useless to you as a rebuttal for the claim that businesses are persons. You're the one that looks silly, here.
you seem to be losing track here, you said to me, and laughed, "why am i using u.s. code", and i told you its the law currently, becuase you stated a business is not a person, but the code says it is......so please keep up with me.
Animals are treated as people with respect to some laws. For example, you can't torture certain animals. Does that make them persons now?
animals dont have rights per the constitution, however states can make laws re-guarding animals, in other words its not a federal duty.
"the federal government duties are few and defined, were as the states are vast"
And all you have are those libertarian ideals to back up the erroneous claims you've made in this thread. In other words, you really have nothing.
actually i do, you see i have what is written on paper for everyone to see, its call the constitution, the supreme law of the land, and government doing anything outside of its delegated powers is unconstitutional, as the founders say, if government wants more powers , they have to get an amendment and approval of the states, becuase that increase of power, would be taking away a state power.
federal laws and state laws which infringe on the rights of people who have committed no crime, or who have not created a health or safety issue is unconstitutional, becuase the constitution only places limits on governments..never people or business.
please i ask you go to the libertarian platform and read it, ..its based on freedom liberty, and limited government....what harm can i do just to read it.
Platform | Libertarian Party