- Joined
- Aug 26, 2012
- Messages
- 8,247
- Reaction score
- 2,713
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Independent
I'm sorry, but it doesn't. It's a stretch of logic. To say it does.
Do you want to offer any actual argument to back up your statement, or are you going to stick with, "Nuh-uh" as your response?
Once again If a person cannot exclude someone from his property, then he cannot be said to be the exclusive owner.