• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Do You Agree with John Stossel?

Should the public accommodations portion of the law be repealed?

  • Total voters
    96
Henrin said:
You're kidding, right? Everyone has a right to their labor. It is perfectly in line with everything being said.
Click to expand...
I didn't say it, your buddy said it. Whine to him if you have an issue with it.
 
Boo Radley said:
Knows more (resisting have fun about cars and planes and the Internet). Wrong framing again. Simply, Madison didn't live through civil rights and the last two hundred years. If he had, he too would have likely argued for changes to meet the new Robles. They don't duck them when they were alive, I doubt they duck them now. We've lived a history in which we faced challenges and addressed them. And rather well overall.
Click to expand...

this is funny.
 
ernst barkmann said:
i asked what rights are being violated by a business, when it does not serve someone.
Click to expand...

They are not violating anyone's rights when they decide they do not desire to serve someone.
 
Henrin said:
There is no such thing as a right to equal treatment when it comes to arrangements with your fellow citizens.
Click to expand...

Isn't there to some degree? Try opening a whites only establishment. Wasn't there something about Walmart and treatment of women? Again, history. ;)

Anyway, off to bed. I can repeat myself tomorrow. Of course, you could try to address our shared history. It would be a welcome approach.

Nite
 
ernst barkmann said:
what right?..name the right...a right to what?
Click to expand...

I have no idea why you are asking me these line of questions. They don't have a rights on the table from what I can tell in this arrangement.
 
Boo Radley said:
Isn't there to some degree? Try opening a whites only establishment. Wasn't there something about Walmart and treatment of women? Again, history. ;)

Anyway, off to bed. I can repeat myself tomorrow. Of course, you could try to address our shared history. It would be a welcome approach.

Nite
Click to expand...

More leaning on law when your logic falls apart. Predictable.
 
ernst barkmann said:
lets see now, Madison laid the framework for the constitution,

took all the notes of the constitutional convention.
talk more on the constitution when anyone at the convention.
made more proposals then anyone, and were accepted by anyone else.
wrote the bill or tights
federalist papers

i would say he is the highest authority on our constitution and bill of rights.
Click to expand...
The highest authority is the written document. There is no higher authority for any contract than the contract itself.


Once again, Madison has NO legal authority.
 
How many times is property mentioned in the constitution? Anyone know?
 
ernst barkmann said:
then why is government suing people , who dont serve other people....where does government get the authority, to sue people becuase they did not offer serve to people
Click to expand...
Read the court cases, it's in there. These laws have been challenged many times and have almost always held. Boo Radley gave you plenty of evidence, I won't repeat it.
 
MoSurveyor said:
Read the court cases, it's in there. These laws have been challenged many times and have almost always held. Boo Radley gave you plenty of evidence, I won't repeat it.
Click to expand...

You're talking about a law that deals with racism. I highly doubt you don't understand how that makes all rulings suspect towards it. We both know they would never rule against this law regardless of what was in it. Don't try to pretend otherwise.
 
ernst barkmann said:
9th amendment.

plus it also u.s.code law, organic law of the u.s.
Click to expand...
The 9th Amendment does even contain the word "property".


And which laws might those be, exactly? Are we talking about the same type of laws that include discrimination by chance?
 
james madison- report on the Virgina resolutions

Here is an express and solemn declaration by the Convention of the State, that they ratified the Constitution in the sense that no right of any denomination can be cancelled, abridged, restrained, or modified, by the Government of the United States, or any part of it, except in those instances in which power is given by the Constitution; and in the sense, particularly, "that among other essential rights, the liberty of conscience and freedom of the press cannot be cancelled, abridged, restrained, or modified, by any authority of the United States."
 
Btw, no one answered my question. How many times is the word property used in the Constitution?
 
ernst barkmann said:
then why is government preforming these actions against people?
Click to expand...
I already told you why and you refused to listen. I'll try it once more and this time you'll have to remember.

Redistribution of wealth and minimum wage are economic decisions and have nothing to do with morality.

Discrimination and affirmative action are laws in place to resolve societal issues that were threatening to tear the country apart. In time the pendulum will swing the other way and they'll go by the wayside.
 
MoSurveyor said:
The 9th Amendment does even contain the word "property".
Click to expand...

does it say vote either, but the court says it does, and so it is with property


MoSurveyor said:
And which laws might those be, exactly? Are we talking about the same type of laws that include discrimination by chance?
Click to expand...

the DOI is u.s.code of the u.s, its organic law, which is the basis of the constitution, its on the first page of u..s code
 
Last edited:
The reasons for acting on the economic conditions are based on morality.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom