Aderleth
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Apr 6, 2011
- Messages
- 4,294
- Reaction score
- 2,027
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
Who the **** is SCOTUA?:lamo
You'll have to ask my phone's autocorrect function.
Who the **** is SCOTUA?:lamo
Yeah, but Canada sucks.
Yes it does, they hate their citizens
Yeah, that's the argument everyone makes when SCOTUS makes a ruling with which they disagree.
They appear to treat business owners like slaves and shut down their business when they disobey their master. We aren't much better though.
Yes it does, they hate their citizens
I would like to know how? It was created by parliament in the 1980s thus reflecting modern values in our society and was voted on by our MPs.
I would like to know how? It was created by parliament in the 1980s thus reflecting modern values in our society and was voted on by our MPs.
why?
if you agree with them, get them. so long as you did, a person that didn't get vaccinations can't harm you.
Their medical coverage is the worst. My company is global and our associates there come here for medical even though they have to pay the extra taxes there. It is sickening some of the stories I have heard about there.
Exclusionary means the owner has control over use of the property--the owner can exclude (or not) whoever he wants. Private property is always exclusionary by definition. So public accommodations law is really just a way of violating property rights by prohibiting full exercise of the exclusionary component.1). Because it's not the same type of discrimination. Why?
2) Because all private property is not private and exclusionary by definition. Here's a fairly obvious example.
What do you do when you're approaching the closed door of a private residence you'd like to enter?
And what do you do when you approach the front door of a Starbucks you'd like to enter?
If your answer to those two questions is not the same, you have implicitly recognized the difference between a public accommodation and a truly private space.
Business owners are citizens and private property owners.
Medical coverage is not written into our Charter of Rights and Freedoms, it is something we take every pride in and people will fight tooth and nail for it. I hear far more good stories than bad and all my experiences and those of my friends have been all been good. Have you actually read our Charter of Rights and Freedoms?
NO, but I have been to countless funeral for friends whose relatives died waiting for surgery. I find comfort knowing that won't happen to me or my loved ones here.
They appear to treat business owners like slaves and shut down their business when they disobey their master. We aren't much better though.
:lamo :rofl :screwy
Their medical coverage is the worst. My company is global and our associates there come here for medical even though they have to pay the extra taxes there. It is sickening some of the stories I have heard about there.
I know no one and have not heard of anyone who has done so. Our system is one of the best in the world and we will do anything to keep it and it's also cheaper than yours. You might also want to read it here then.
LOL.
The part I bolded... can you please explain? opcorn:
:liar2 :liar
1). What do you do when you're approaching the closed door of a private residence you'd like to enter?
1)And what do you do when you approach the front door of a Starbucks you'd like to enter?
You're right they're more like involuntary servants that have to do your bidding or face punishment.
It is not cheaper than mine, our associate in Montreal would gladly take out insurance if they could opt out of yours.
I did in another post, i feel sorry for Canadians