pbrauer
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2010
- Messages
- 25,394
- Reaction score
- 7,208
- Location
- Oregon
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
Go ahead, tell us why a reporter would solicit information if not to disclose it?
If Rosen was only interested in receiving the information, not sharing it, why would all his home and office, private and business phone records be gathered?
If Holder claimed under the application for a warrant that Rosen was a co-conspirator, what do you think that means? If it means he is suspected of aiding in the disclosure of classified information, isn't that the same, under America law, as having committed the crime yourself? If you and your partner rob a bank and your partner kills someone, aren't you also charged with murder?
I appreciate the political hackery here, but I have a higher opinion of your intelligence than to assume you're falling for the spiel your trying to sell.
If a reporter receives confidential information, the reporter is free to share the information. The problem is when the reporter asks for the information. Read pages 19 and 20 in the affidavit to get a flavor of the emails.
http://apps.washingtonpost.com/g/page/local/affidavit-for-search-warrant/162/