• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Death penalty for voter fraud

Do you support the death penalty for voter fraud?

  • I'm a Democrat and approve the death penalty for committing voter fraud.

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    75
So who besides YOu decided it was a "landmark" study?

:D

He made an "absolute" statement that photo IDs for voters was only good for ONE thing.
I suggested another and valid use for the IDs.

The authors "ONLY" was blown out of the water and the author shown to be non-objective.

YOU will have to deal with his studies failure.

Unlike you, I didn't/don't invest any faith or value in his (or yours for that matter) opinion. :D

You gave us YOUR OPINION about voter ID.

You did nothing to deny anything in the actual study.

I give you facts and studies while you give me your opinion. Some debate huh? :doh:roll:

As to it being a landmark study, it would have that it was obvious to any intelligent person reading it and seeing the data enclosed within it. You did read it didn't you? Did you understand it?

But to show you I am open to hearing your side, please do feel free to present your own data and your own version of what you feel is a "landmark study" on voter fraud. I will welcome it with open arms and an open mind.
 
Last edited:
So much anger. So little substance.

that was exactly my opinion of the post I was referring to. Glad to see you agree.

btw - as to substance, people may want to know a bit about who produced that study on voter fraud.

New York University School of Law - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

While they are not the Palin & Paul Political Populist Parade Pontificators - they certainly are people of high education, excellent reputation and great academic quality.
 
that was exactly my opinion of the post I was referring to. Glad to see you agree.

btw - as to substance, people may want to know a bit about who produced that study on voter fraud.

New York University School of Law - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

While they are not the Palin & Paul Political Populist Parade Pontificators - they certainly are people of high education, excellent reputation and great academic quality.
Gun ownership is a right. Voting is a right. I take you think no picture ID should be required for either.
 
I'm afraid haymarket is in denial.

It seems, haymarket wants some irrefutable proof before permitting voter IDs.

33 states had voter ID laws BEFORE 2012 and will be in effect for 2014 midterm elections.

I predict a REVOLUTION in American politics 2014! :D

I expect to see incumbents both parties evicted, and a bunch of independents taking their seats! :D
 
Gun ownership is a right. Voting is a right. I take you think no picture ID should be required for either.
That's right, I do not think a picture ID is required for either.
 
There will never be a true vote in america again until we get rid of the machines. They won't. If millions of people volunteered to do the hand ballot count, they would say no and force us to continue using the machines. This is serious. We need to go back to hand counting before they get too comfortable (well, they already are - we just need to ban the machines)
 
Back
Top Bottom