• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Would you support impeaching President Obama?

Would you support impeaching President Obama?

  • Total voters
    59
APACHERAT said:
In the past four years there are more people getting my money than before Obama became POTUS.
Click to expand...
Ohh so now its not about the action its about how much of it goes to "people" :lamo


More people are getting free stuff than any time in America's history.
Click to expand...
Uhhh no..... You forget that sequester?

:monkey:monkey
 
APACHERAT said:
There was no sequester during Obama's first term.
Click to expand...
So wait now we can pick and choose.
So pretty much ones a socialist by the "amount of free stuff they get"? :lamo
What is the amount that takes them over that makes one a socialist?
 
TheDemSocialist said:
So wait now we can pick and choose.
So pretty much ones a socialist by the "amount of free stuff they get"? :lamo
What is the amount that takes them over that makes one a socialist?
Click to expand...

Receiving free stuff doesn't make one a socialist.

But someone who takes stuff from one person be it property or money and redistributes to other people could make that person a socialist.

I'm a big supporter of private property rights. And I'll stand up and defend any ones private property when government abuses imminent domain or forces and easement over someones property.
 
APACHERAT said:
Receiving free stuff doesn't make one a socialist.

But someone who takes stuff from one person be it property or money and redistributes to other people could make that person a socialist.

I'm a big supporter of private property rights. And I'll stand up and defend any ones private property when government abuses imminent domain or forces and easement over someones property.
Click to expand...

So whats the amount? Because Obama passed the bush tax cuts, did he not? No matter what there is gonna be taxes. So what is the amount that makes one a socialist?
 
TheDemSocialist said:
So whats the amount? Because Obama passed the bush tax cuts, did he not? No matter what there is gonna be taxes. So what is the amount that makes one a socialist?
Click to expand...

It has more to do what they do with my money (taxes), how it's spent where it goes and who gets it.

Obama is overloading the system hoping that it fails.

You identify yourself as a socialist so you should know exactly what I'm talking about. The strategy for forcing political change through orchestrated crisis. Known as the "Cloward - Piven Strategy."

>" First proposed in 1966 and named after Columbia University sociologists Richard Andrew Cloward and his wife Frances Fox Piven (both longtime members of the Democratic Socialists of America, where Piven today is an honorary chair), the "Cloward-Piven Strategy" seeks to hasten the fall of capitalism by overloading the government bureaucracy with a flood of impossible demands, thus pushing society into crisis and economic collapse. "<

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/printgroupProfile.asp?grpid=7522
 
APACHERAT said:
It has more to do what they do with my money (taxes), how it's spent where it goes and who gets it.
Click to expand...
Dude you have no idea what socialism is. Socialism is not taxing, its not spending money on projects you dont like. Thats not socialism.


Obama is overloading the system hoping that it fails.
Click to expand...
Ohhh :doh

You identify yourself as a socialist so you should know exactly what I'm talking about. The strategy for forcing political change through orchestrated crisis. Known as the "Cloward - Piven Strategy."

>" First proposed in 1966 and named after Columbia University sociologists Richard Andrew Cloward and his wife Frances Fox Piven (both longtime members of the Democratic Socialists of America, where Piven today is an honorary chair), the "Cloward-Piven Strategy" seeks to hasten the fall of capitalism by overloading the government bureaucracy with a flood of impossible demands, thus pushing society into crisis and economic collapse. "<

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/printgroupProfile.asp?grpid=7522
Click to expand...

During the "radical 60's" when a good chunk of "leftists" wanted the "system to fall" but later in the 80's seems like he didnt want the system to fall.

So basically you believe Obama wants to destroy America :roll:
 
TheDemSocialist said:
Dude you have no idea what socialism is. Socialism is not taxing, its not spending money on projects you dont like. Thats not socialism.



Ohhh :doh



During the "radical 60's" when a good chunk of "leftists" wanted the "system to fall" but later in the 80's seems like he didnt want the system to fall.

So basically you believe Obama wants to destroy America :roll:
Click to expand...

Sure seems like it.

Look at the damage he has inflicted on our national security and the military.

Look at the trillions of dollars of deficit spending.

Look at how many Americans have a monkey on their backs and have become dependent on government.

Look at how America hasn't been so divided since 1860.

Obama spending trillions of dollars we don't have and the Feds printing trillions to back up Obama's economy with nothing to back it up with.

Obama can’t blame Bush for deficits any longer :

Obama can?t blame Bush for deficits any longer - Washington Post
 
Not for any scandals in particular, just for all the times he has violated the Constitution.
 
MaggieD said:
Absolutely not. At least so far. ;)

Cute signature!!! How'd you do that???

If it said, "Eat at McDonald's," perhaps you could get an endorsement.

Edit: Do you live close to the Tualatin Valley Highway??
Click to expand...

He got that signature from the figurers at Media Matters.
 
Fer what?
 
TheDemSocialist said:
So whats the amount? Because Obama passed the bush tax cuts, did he not? No matter what there is gonna be taxes. So what is the amount that makes one a socialist?
Click to expand...

The rationale behind such taxes. There isn't a set % of taxes where you say "oh yeah that definitely is socialist." Socialism isn't a set amount of taxes or redistribution, socialism is a system that heavily favors such redistribution.
When you pass tax hikes that are primarily targeted at only the rich, I'd that is something socialist in principle. We may not be a socialist country for raising taxes, but raising taxes definitely requires a socialist rationale behind it.
 
pbrauer said:
I don't believe there is a valid reason to impeach him, however since I've seen the world mentioned many times I thought I would ask anyway.
Click to expand...
I know he believes that none of it is his fault, but how naïve does one have to be? He's too blameless; too perfect. No politician is as squeaky clean as he claims to be. Besides, there's too much controversy surrounding his office, and his party for that matter, anyways.
 
It would be entirely appropriate to impeach Obama for ordering the assassination of American citizens without due process. Unfortunately, it seems that the majority of congress actually supports him on the issue.
 
rathi said:
It would be entirely appropriate to impeach Obama for ordering the assassination of American citizens without due process. Unfortunately, it seems that the majority of congress actually supports him on the issue.
Click to expand...

That is why I voted yes. Killing American citizens without due process is enough.
 
I dunno. After GWB, getting off scott free for damn near ruining our nation, without impeachment, I think all future president's got a pretty easy path free of impeachment.
 
The only impeachable offense is his engaging in wars against other countries without Congressional permission and authorization - specifically Libya in which the specific goal was to overthrow and destroy and existing government and leaders of that government. That is THE definition of full war. I would vote for impeachment on that to stop the escalation of an Imperial presidency he operations as.
 
432035_592373307462595_1499515845_n.jpg


None of this is impeachable. He is a liar though, probably on the order of the number of people out of work. :lol:
 
I can only imagine how bad these figures would have been had we elected someone from the party that created the downfall in the first place.

It's hard to turn a big ship around.

But my investments have recovered. The D.O.W. is over 15k now. Whoda thunk? Thank you President Obama.
 
Captain America said:
I can only imagine how bad these figures would have been had we elected someone from the party that created the downfall in the first place.
Click to expand...

The republicans did what now?
 
pbrauer said:
I don't believe there is a valid reason to impeach him, however since I've seen the world mentioned many times I thought I would ask anyway.
Click to expand...

His complete lack of accountability and/or control of his administration is more than enough to impeach him.
 
mac said:
His complete lack of accountability and/or control of his administration is more than enough to impeach him.
Click to expand...
Yeah, that schmuck didn't say Benghazi was terrorism, he said it was an act of terror. Impeach the bastard. :roll:
 
pbrauer said:
Yeah, that schmuck didn't say Benghazi was terrorism, he said it was an act of terror. Impeach the bastard. :roll:
Click to expand...

Among other things.
 
pbrauer said:
Yeah, that schmuck didn't say Benghazi was terrorism, he said it was an act of terror. Impeach the bastard. :roll:
Click to expand...

Benghazi is entirely irrelevant. The lack of accountability is illustrated by the administrations claim that they can kill American citizens without any kind of judicial oversight.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom