Would you support impeaching President Obama?

APACHERAT said:

After 9/11/ President G.W. Bush didn't spend eight years blaming President Clinton's failed terrorism policies.

I know exactly which radical leftist church that was being investigated by the IRS, All Saints Church in Pasadena, California. I was invited to attend that church by one of my liberal friends. The Preacher tells you who to vote for and just about every radical leftist political organization has tables and booths set up every Sunday morning including Cold Pink, Party for Socialism and Liberation, A*N*S*W*E*R* Coalition, and a few dozen more. Even socialist have secretly turned to God.

Click to expand...

Oh yea i forgot conservative churches dont tell people who to vote for :lamo

Nixon and Watergate today looks more like a traffic violation comparable to a burned out tail light compared to the current corrupt Obama administration. No body was killed during the Watergate burglary or during the cover up.

Click to expand...

Oh yea i forgot "bengazigate" is worse than watergate, iran-contra combined :roll:

TheDemSocialist said:

The direct warnings to Mr. Bush about the possibility of a Qaeda attack began in the spring of 2001. By May 1, the Central Intelligence Agency told the White House of a report that “a group presently in the United States” was planning a terrorist operation. Weeks later, on June 22, the daily brief reported that Qaeda strikes could be “imminent,” although intelligence suggested the time frame was flexible....Yet, the White House failed to take significant action."
[/url]

Click to expand...

And exactly what actions was POTUS suppose have taken ?

The 9/11 Commission determined that it was liberal political correctness that allowed the terrorist to board those four aircraft on the morning of 9-11-01. Just like the Boston bombings, it was liberal political correctness that allowed this family to come to America as refuges and suck off $100,000 in welfare from the 53 % who actually pay individual income taxes before carrying out their terrorist bombings.

Every morning POTUS receives his national security briefing. Every morning there's a report of a possible terrorist attack. 99.999 % of the time they don't happen.

All intelligence services, government and private knew that Al Qaeda was planning another attack against America. No one knew they were going to use commercial aircraft as WMD's.

Back in 2001 I was a paid subscriber to Strafor, a private geopolitical intelligence service who is also a subcontractor to the federal government. At the time my business required I use this service and it's not cheap. About two weeks before 9-11-01 I get a warning that their will likely be an Al Qaeda attack against America. They believed it would either be a bombing of an American Embassy over seas or an attack against a U.S. Navy ship comparable to the Al Qaeda attack on the USS Cole. Well Strafor just like every other intelegence ageancy and service got it wrong.

The reason the CIA, NSA, ONI, Army Intelligence and the FBI got it wrong was because they couldn't connect the dots because of the "wall" that Clinton's AG. Janet Reno put up. These agencies weren't allowed to share information with each other. Also the Clinton administration made the decision that Al Qaeda was not a national security issue but a law enforcement issue.

pbrauer said:

I don't believe there is a valid reason to impeach him, however since I've seen the world mentioned many times I thought I would ask anyway.

Click to expand...

For what? So far, he hasn't done anything worthy of impeachment.

APACHERAT said:

And exactly what actions was POTUS suppose have taken ?

Click to expand...

Wait!? So whats the difference then with Obama? What position was he supposed to take!? What was he supposed to do? (isnt that what liberals are saying now with Benghazi, oh wait both you guys are just using the same excuses the only difference is with the partisanship)

If a socialist is always defending President Obama and always supporting Obama's failed policies, can we assume that Obama may be a socialist ?

APACHERAT said:

If a socialist is always defending President Obama and always supporting Obama's failed policies, can we assume that Obama may be a socialist ?

Click to expand...

Im always defending Obama? Plllleeeeaaassseeee.... :doh Only time i "support Obama" is when you guys try to make it look like its the end of his presidency. Hell the far right has been doing that since day ****ing one.

But remember when all else fails just play the "Obama socialist" card.

pbrauer said:

I don't believe there is a valid reason to impeach him, however since I've seen the world mentioned many times I thought I would ask anyway.

Click to expand...

No. I disagree with his policies and don't trust the guy. But unless he was more involved with the IRS scandal then is being let out right now, there's no reason to impeach him. And president Biden is a scary thought.

TheDemSocialist said:

Im always defending Obama? Plllleeeeaaassseeee.... :doh Only time i "support Obama" is when you guys try to make it look like its the end of his presidency. Hell the far right has been doing that since day ****ing one.

But remember when all else fails just play the "Obama socialist" card.

Click to expand...

He may or may not be a socialist directly, but Democrats as a whole are definitely tinted pink and reek of bad policy.

ReformCollege said:

He may or may not be a socialist directly, but Democrats as a whole are definitely tinted pink and reek of bad policy.

Click to expand...

So is everyone then in that book. If were gonna play the narrow definition game of socialism then everyone is in one way or another.

TheDemSocialist said:

Oh wait so we are gonna cherrypick? Ok!

"
The direct warnings to Mr. Bush about the possibility of a Qaeda attack began in the spring of 2001. By May 1, the Central Intelligence Agency told the White House of a report that “a group presently in the United States” was planning a terrorist operation. Weeks later, on June 22, the daily brief reported that Qaeda strikes could be “imminent,” although intelligence suggested the time frame was flexible....Yet, the White House failed to take significant action."
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/11/opinion/the-bush-white-house-was-deaf-to-9-11-warnings.html

"U.S. intelligence officials warned President Bush weeks before the Sept. 11 attacks that Osama bin Laden's terrorist network might hijack American planes, but White House officials stressed the threat was not specific."
Bush Warned of Hijackings Before 9-11 - ABC News

Click to expand...

Well I am here to warn you that sometime between today and the end of the year, someone may or may not be planning on nuking Kansas. What's your plan to prevent this travesty from occurring?

ReformCollege said:

Well I am here to warn you that sometime between today and the end of the year, someone may or may not be planning on nuking Kansas. What's your plan to prevent this travesty from occurring?

Click to expand...

Invade Greenland.

ReformCollege said:

Well I am here to warn you that sometime between today and the end of the year, someone may or may not be planning on nuking Kansas. What's your plan to prevent this travesty from occurring?

Click to expand...

Lets see here "planning on hijacking planes".. Hmm whats a common sense way to stop this... Hmmm ramp up airport security, deeper security checks before you get in the terminal.

TheDemSocialist said:

Wait!? So whats the difference then with Obama? What position was he supposed to take!? What was he supposed to do? (isnt that what liberals are saying now with Benghazi, oh wait both you guys are just using the same excuses the only difference is with the partisanship)

Click to expand...

All Obama should have done and no more was contact the military and inform them that the consulate in Benghazi was under attack and that four Americans needed to be rescued.

That's all he had to do. No President or civilian should ever decide what the strategy or tactics should be used by the military. In the past 100 years I can only think of one POTUS who would have been qualified to do that and he use to wear five stars on his collar. But that President as Cn'C followed the military chain of command and didn't micromanage America's military services. Eisenhower was his name. LBJ micromanaged a war. True he had some military experience but no experience on setting a military strategy and what tactics should be used. He ###### up big time.

Obama did ###### nothing. Likely because he was campaigning on that Bin Laden was dead, that Al Qaeda was on the run and being decimated. The attack on the consulate in Benghazi showed that Obama lied to the American people to get reelected. That's what the Benghazi cover up was all about. Blame it on a You Tube video, it wasn't a terrorist attack by Al Qaeda affiliates.

There's also another problem with Obama, he's an incompetent Cn'C who has established a record of not being able to make quick decisions when they need to be made. But Benghazi is more than incompetency, it's dereliction of duty as Cn'C.

TheDemSocialist said:

So is everyone then in that book. If were gonna play the narrow definition game of socialism then everyone is in one way or another.

Click to expand...

Your post doesn't make any sense, what so ever. If "everyone is a socialist" to one degree or another, then that would imply a broad, vague definition of socialism. If it was a narrow definition, which seems to be what you are claiming, then only proclaimed socialists and syndicates would be socialist at all.

What I am actually saying is neither of those things. I'm saying, someone can be partial to socialist policies without actually being a card carrying socialist.

TheDemSocialist said:

Lets see here "planning on hijacking planes".. Hmm whats a common sense way to stop this... Hmmm ramp up airport security, deeper security checks before you get in the terminal.

Click to expand...

Have you seen this? You'll really get a good laugh out of this one.

TheDemSocialist said:

Lets see here "planning on hijacking planes".. Hmm whats a common sense way to stop this... Hmmm ramp up airport security, deeper security checks before you get in the terminal.

Click to expand...

Liberals made it clear, no profiling of passengers at the airport. With over 80,000 daily flights in America where do you start ? The liberal Democrats would have gone bananas if airport security were to have signaled out middle eastern looking people.

As the 9/11 Commission Report pointed out, airport security and airline agents were suspicious of the terrorist while they were in the airport terminals but couldn't do a damn thing because of political correctness and being afraid that liberals would call them racist.

ReformCollege said:

Have you seen this? You'll really get a good laugh out of this one.

Click to expand...

I have seen it and love South Park, all im saying is the hypocrisy of the right is outstanding in situations like this.

APACHERAT said:

Liberals made it clear, no profiling of passengers at the airport. With over 80,000 daily flights in America where do you start ? The liberal Democrats would have gone bananas if airport security were to have signaled out middle eastern looking people.

As the 9/11 Commission Report pointed out, airport security and airline agents were suspicious of the terrorist while they were in the airport terminals but couldn't do a damn thing because of political correctness and being afraid that liberals would call them racist.

Click to expand...

Ohh i forgot excuse me! I forgot! Its the liberals faults! :lamo

TheDemSocialist said:

Im always defending Obama? Plllleeeeaaassseeee.... :doh Only time i "support Obama" is when you guys try to make it look like its the end of his presidency. Hell the far right has been doing that since day ****ing one.

But remember when all else fails just play the "Obama socialist" card.

Click to expand...

I only speak for myself and after reading Obama's "Dreams From My Father" I came to the conclusion that Obama is an internationalist socialist. He admits he's an internationalist. He's already taken a lot of my money and gave it to other people.

APACHERAT said:

I only speak for myself and after reading Obama's "Dreams From My Father" I came to the conclusion that Obama is an internationalist socialist. He admits he's an internationalist. He's already taken a lot of my money and gave it to other people.

Click to expand...

Alright Obama 2016 :lamo

So when Bush was in power, and he taxed you and then "gave it to other people" what was that?
When Reagan was in power, and he taxed you and then "gave it to other people" what was that?

TheDemSocialist said:

Ohh i forgot excuse me! I forgot! Its the liberals faults! :lamo

Click to expand...

He does have a point. You're exhibiting conflicting viewpoints when you want the airports to take additional security measures yet (I would guess) are completely against any sort of racial profiling as a measure of implementing those security measures.

TheDemSocialist said:

Ohh i forgot excuse me! I forgot! Its the liberals faults! :lamo

Click to expand...

Don't forget there are many radical leftist who hide behind the label of calling themselves liberals or progressives.

ReformCollege said:

He does have a point. You're exhibiting conflicting viewpoints when you want the airports to take additional security measures yet (I would guess) are completely against any sort of racial profiling as a measure of implementing those security measures.

Click to expand...

Extra security measures? Like what banning sharp objects that can be used to hijack an airplane? Seems like common sense measure to me.

TheDemSocialist said:

Alright Obama 2016 :lamo

So when Bush was in power, and he taxed you and then "gave it to other people" what was that?
When Reagan was in power, and he taxed you and then "gave it to other people" what was that?

Click to expand...

In the past four years there are more people getting my money than before Obama became POTUS.

More people are getting free stuff than any time in America's history.

APACHERAT said:

Don't forget there are many radical leftist who hide behind the label of calling themselves liberals or progressives.

Click to expand...

:lamo
Like what? Like who?
Remember those pesky imaginary socialists are everywhere