• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Would you support impeaching President Obama?

Would you support impeaching President Obama?


  • Total voters
    59

pbrauer

DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 6, 2010
Messages
25,394
Reaction score
7,208
Location
Oregon
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Liberal
I don't believe there is a valid reason to impeach him, however since I've seen the world mentioned many times I thought I would ask anyway.
 
I don't believe there is a valid reason to impeach him, however since I've seen the world mentioned many times I thought I would ask anyway.

Absolutely not. At least so far. ;)

Cute signature!!! How'd you do that???

If it said, "Eat at McDonald's," perhaps you could get an endorsement.

Edit: Do you live close to the Tualatin Valley Highway??
 
Are you asking if I would throw peaches at it? Meh, terrible waste of good fruit, I'd say no.
 
Absolutely not. At least so far. ;)

Cute signature!!! How'd you do that???

If it said, "Eat at McDonald's," perhaps you could get an endorsement.

Edit: Do you live close to the Tualatin Valley Highway??
Yes, about one mile north of TV highway.
 
I don't believe there is a valid reason to impeach him, however since I've seen the world mentioned many times I thought I would ask anyway.

Does dereliction of duty meet the criteria of "high crimes and misdemeanors ? If so, IMPEACH and CONVICT.
 
Your poll question is too open ended for a legitimate response. If your desire is to ascertain if any of the information currently known justifies impeachment, well no certainly not. But IF something is learned that would rise to the level to justify it (with these issues or any unknown others), well yes...wouldn't you?
 
Does dereliction of duty meet the criteria of "high crimes and misdemeanors ? If so, IMPEACH and CONVICT.

Your poll question is too open ended for a legitimate response. If your desire is to ascertain if any of the information currently known justifies impeachment, well no certainly not. But IF something is learned that would rise to the level to justify it (with these issues or any unknown others), well yes...wouldn't you?
I am speaking about three so-called scandals are in the forefront right now. I remember when President Clinton was impeached, his polls numbers went up and of course the Senate didn't get the 67 votes to convict hom.
 
I don't believe there is a valid reason to impeach him, however since I've seen the world mentioned many times I thought I would ask anyway.

There's no real reason to impeach Obama - he's doing a bang-up job of discrediting his Presidency himself - leave him in office and let him finish the destruction. Perhaps then it will be a lesson to Americans to actually think more about the qualifications of a potential President and not just whether he has a nice smile and can carry a tune.
 
There's no real reason to impeach Obama - he's doing a bang-up job of discrediting his Presidency himself - leave him in office and let him finish the destruction. Perhaps then it will be a lesson to Americans to actually think more about the qualifications of a potential President and not just whether he has a nice smile and can carry a tune.
Maybe he should have learned how to convince our nation to wage war against a country that did't attack us or one of our allies, them maybe you would think he was more qualified, yes?
 
I am speaking about three so-called scandals are in the forefront right now. I remember when President Clinton was impeached, his polls numbers went up and of course the Senate didn't get the 67 votes to convict hom.

Failure as Commander and Chief to order the U.S. military to go in and rescue American citizen in Benghazi is dereliction of duty.

Not being aware that the IRS was targeting conservatives to help Obama get reelected is dereliction of duty.

If White House staff released classified information to the press, since Obama is responsible for the actions of who serves under him, that's incompetency, dereliction of duty and treason.

Since the Obama administration is the most corrupt administration in history, that's a high crime.
 
Maybe he should have learned how to convince our nation to wage war against a country that did't attack us or one of our allies, them maybe you would think he was more qualified, yes?

Actually, more qualified doesn't necessarily mean you won't make mistakes, just means you won't be going into things with your ass in your hands.

The Presidency isn't a position that has a lot of prior job training attached to it, but generally speaking you'd want to have someone who actually successfully managed something, successfully governed somewhere, successfully met a payroll sometime, held the lives of others in their hands at one point, successfully generated something of value sometime, created and met a budget at one time, etc. Those are all pretty good indicators that you will be able to logically work your way around big government issues.

Being able to carry a tune on the stage of the Apollo Theatre, being able to fill out a March Madness bracket, being able to shoot hoops, being able to bloviate ad nauseum, etc. are not generally considered good preparation for the Presidency. The last four plus years has proven why.
 
Failure as Commander and Chief to order the U.S. military to go in and rescue American citizen in Benghazi is dereliction of duty.
President Bush misleading about the threat Saddam Hussein posed.

Not being aware that the IRS was targeting conservatives to help Obama get reelected is dereliction of duty.
:lamo

If White House staff released classified information to the press, since Obama is responsible for the actions of who serves under him, that's incompetency, dereliction of duty and treason.
Valerie Plame identity released to the press.

Since the Obama administration is the most corrupt administration in history, that's a high crime.
Not by a very long shot.
 
Actually, more qualified doesn't necessarily mean you won't make mistakes, just means you won't be going into things with your ass in your hands.
The Iraq war wasn't a mere mistake, was a hug mistake that estimates that say when every is said and done, the cost will be approximately $2.2 Trillion. :doh:(

The Presidency isn't a position that has a lot of prior job training attached to it, but generally speaking you'd want to have someone who actually successfully managed something, successfully governed somewhere, successfully met a payroll sometime, held the lives of others in their hands at one point, successfully generated something of value sometime, created and met a budget at one time, etc. Those are all pretty good indicators that you will be able to logically work your way around big government issues.
I don't want a CEO as a president.:roll:

Being able to carry a tune on the stage of the Apollo Theatre, being able to fill out a March Madness bracket, being able to shoot hoops, being able to bloviate ad nauseum, etc. are not generally considered good preparation for the Presidency. The last four plus years has proven why.
Those things make the guy human, maybe if Mitt Romney had some of those qualities he might be president today.
 
Only if Biden is removed first
 
Maybe, but I do kind of like the gridlock. This is how Jefferson wanted it to be.
 
"Would you support impeaching President Obama?'

Not for all the tea in China. President Joe Biden?!:shock:
 
The Iraq war wasn't a mere mistake, was a hug mistake that estimates that say when every is said and done, the cost will be approximately $2.2 Trillion. :doh:(

That can certainly be asserted but only from the perspective of hindsight. You DO remember that the Iraq resolution passed the House with 40% of the Democrats (minority party) and the Senate with 58% of the Democrats (minority party) voting for it. Now if you can find such support in the current Congress for the actions in Benghazi you MAY be able to breath life into that strawman...as it is now we just don't know ALL THE FACTS but perhaps 4-8yrs down the road the 'scandal' MAY look very different...we'll see. ;)
 
No. He should not be impeached. Its insanity to say he should, and its mainly partisan bull**** as usually.
2youwqw.jpg
 
Failure as Commander and Chief to order the U.S. military to go in and rescue American citizen in Benghazi is dereliction of duty.
And when 3,000 Americans died on 9/11 that was just "ehhh **** happens"..


Not being aware that the IRS was targeting conservatives to help Obama get reelected is dereliction of duty.
And when the IRS was targeting liberal and left wing churches under Bush that was just "ehhh **** happens"



Since the Obama administration is the most corrupt administration in history, that's a high crime.

Yea... I can name several right off the back. Jackson, and Nixon.
 
I don't believe there is a valid reason to impeach him, however since I've seen the world mentioned many times I thought I would ask anyway.

If he was convicted of a crime, of course. Wouldn't you?
 
And when 3,000 Americans died on 9/11 that was just "ehhh **** happens"..



And when the IRS was targeting liberal and left wing churches under Bush that was just "ehhh **** happens"





Yea... I can name several right off the back. Jackson, and Nixon.

Trufer alert!!!!!
 
Back
Top Bottom