I don't believe there is a valid reason to impeach him, however since I've seen the world mentioned many times I thought I would ask anyway.
Yes, about one mile north of TV highway.Absolutely not. At least so far.
Cute signature!!! How'd you do that???
If it said, "Eat at McDonald's," perhaps you could get an endorsement.
Edit: Do you live close to the Tualatin Valley Highway??
I don't believe there is a valid reason to impeach him, however since I've seen the world mentioned many times I thought I would ask anyway.
Does dereliction of duty meet the criteria of "high crimes and misdemeanors ? If so, IMPEACH and CONVICT.
I am speaking about three so-called scandals are in the forefront right now. I remember when President Clinton was impeached, his polls numbers went up and of course the Senate didn't get the 67 votes to convict hom.Your poll question is too open ended for a legitimate response. If your desire is to ascertain if any of the information currently known justifies impeachment, well no certainly not. But IF something is learned that would rise to the level to justify it (with these issues or any unknown others), well yes...wouldn't you?
I don't believe there is a valid reason to impeach him, however since I've seen the world mentioned many times I thought I would ask anyway.
Maybe he should have learned how to convince our nation to wage war against a country that did't attack us or one of our allies, them maybe you would think he was more qualified, yes?There's no real reason to impeach Obama - he's doing a bang-up job of discrediting his Presidency himself - leave him in office and let him finish the destruction. Perhaps then it will be a lesson to Americans to actually think more about the qualifications of a potential President and not just whether he has a nice smile and can carry a tune.
I am speaking about three so-called scandals are in the forefront right now. I remember when President Clinton was impeached, his polls numbers went up and of course the Senate didn't get the 67 votes to convict hom.
Maybe he should have learned how to convince our nation to wage war against a country that did't attack us or one of our allies, them maybe you would think he was more qualified, yes?
President Bush misleading about the threat Saddam Hussein posed.Failure as Commander and Chief to order the U.S. military to go in and rescue American citizen in Benghazi is dereliction of duty.
:lamoNot being aware that the IRS was targeting conservatives to help Obama get reelected is dereliction of duty.
Valerie Plame identity released to the press.If White House staff released classified information to the press, since Obama is responsible for the actions of who serves under him, that's incompetency, dereliction of duty and treason.
Not by a very long shot.Since the Obama administration is the most corrupt administration in history, that's a high crime.
The Iraq war wasn't a mere mistake, was a hug mistake that estimates that say when every is said and done, the cost will be approximately $2.2 Trillion. :dohActually, more qualified doesn't necessarily mean you won't make mistakes, just means you won't be going into things with your ass in your hands.
I don't want a CEO as a president.:roll:The Presidency isn't a position that has a lot of prior job training attached to it, but generally speaking you'd want to have someone who actually successfully managed something, successfully governed somewhere, successfully met a payroll sometime, held the lives of others in their hands at one point, successfully generated something of value sometime, created and met a budget at one time, etc. Those are all pretty good indicators that you will be able to logically work your way around big government issues.
Those things make the guy human, maybe if Mitt Romney had some of those qualities he might be president today.Being able to carry a tune on the stage of the Apollo Theatre, being able to fill out a March Madness bracket, being able to shoot hoops, being able to bloviate ad nauseum, etc. are not generally considered good preparation for the Presidency. The last four plus years has proven why.
Only if Biden is removed first
The Iraq war wasn't a mere mistake, was a hug mistake that estimates that say when every is said and done, the cost will be approximately $2.2 Trillion. :doh
Absolutely not. At least so far.
And when 3,000 Americans died on 9/11 that was just "ehhh **** happens"..Failure as Commander and Chief to order the U.S. military to go in and rescue American citizen in Benghazi is dereliction of duty.
And when the IRS was targeting liberal and left wing churches under Bush that was just "ehhh **** happens"Not being aware that the IRS was targeting conservatives to help Obama get reelected is dereliction of duty.
Since the Obama administration is the most corrupt administration in history, that's a high crime.
I don't believe there is a valid reason to impeach him, however since I've seen the world mentioned many times I thought I would ask anyway.
And when 3,000 Americans died on 9/11 that was just "ehhh **** happens"..
And when the IRS was targeting liberal and left wing churches under Bush that was just "ehhh **** happens"
Yea... I can name several right off the back. Jackson, and Nixon.
Trufer alert!!!!!