• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

If Obama knew....

Vote:

  • Total voters
    59
Jredbaron96 said:
Yeah.

But Given that the Obama administration is actually focusing on The IRS scandal to me indicates that they believe their hands are clean.
Click to expand...

It's a better scandal (and they can sacrifice Lois Lerner) than the Benghazi lies, that is for sure.
 
Dooble said:
There never will be evidence. BHO is a ghost.
Click to expand...

Hmmmm........reminds me more of a stain, or maybe a Shadow, but unlike the real Shadow [ of, "who knows? the Shadow knows" fame ], this Shadow only knows of the stuff he should know after he reads of it in press reports... which is ironic that he is doing so much to illegally shut down the gathering of this information by the AP and Fox news gatherers...
 
Last edited:
Gaugingcatenate said:
Hmmmm........reminds me more of a stain, or maybe a Shadow, but unlike the real Shadow [ of, "who knows? the Shadow knows" fame ], this Shadow only knows of the stuff he should know after he reads of it in press reports... which is ironic that he is doing so much to illegally shut down the gathering of this information by the AP and Fox news gatherers...
Click to expand...
Perhaps. I think he's more like a poltergeist than anything else.
 
roughdraft274 said:
That does not show where I said that "CEOs, Presidents, Owners, should never be held accoutable for what they allow their subordinates to do."

Again, I refer you to that whole reading thing we discussed earlier.
Click to expand...

Just be respectable and admit what you said instead of saying it and then backing out of it
 
mak2 said:
No, I am not kidding you, IF it has been what is IT? Simple questions, no answers. You are in an outrage and dont even know why.
Click to expand...

And like most partisan sheep you are avoiding the subject, Congratulations, I will add you to the ignore list with the rest of your herd
 
Jredbaron96 said:
Yeah.

But Given that the Obama administration is actually focusing on The IRS scandal to me indicates that they believe their hands are clean.
Click to expand...
:wow:

They focused on making sure Sarah Hall Ingram who ran the Internal Revenue Service’s tax-exempt organizations division, was promoted for a job well done to the director of the IRS Affordable Care Act division, responsible for implementing “Obamacare."

Sympathy for the Devil; washed his hands, sealed his fate.
 
Outstanding. No answers for simple questions, and you put me on ignore. :lamo
Rocketman said:
And like most partisan sheep you are avoiding the subject, Congratulations, I will add you to the ignore list with the rest of your herd
Click to expand...
 
the sheep continue to graze with their impeachable President
 
roughdraft274 said:
I never said anything like that. Go troll somebody else please.
Click to expand...

Now you just want to lie about what you said as it was posted obvious to everyone by you, trolling is defined by lying.
 
Quik said:
Innocent victims of pointless wars are still innocent victims of pointless wars. Killing these innocent victims in pointless wars is murder, and murder is worse than targeted taxation.
Click to expand...

Innocent insofar as respect to a court of law, yes. A pointless war, maybe. Targeted taxation? This goes far beyond that.



Your argument that taxation is worse than murder is very, very flimsy. Almost comical.
Click to expand...

My issue is that suppressing the Freedom of Association is worse than the targeting of a few (read: 4) individuals in a Police Action (read: undeclared war) on a cultural movement that has no direct support from a Nation State and that is hostile to the Culture and Beliefs of our people.

Again the IRS simply could have denied their request by 3 months due to inherent political advocacy, but then the groups could go appeal that and that would have been inconvenient and the groups might have won and been able to effect the elections such that Democrats might have lost seats and of course Obama could not have that. The groups targeted were largely conservative and even those few that were progressive I have my suspicions that they too might have been targeted (for reasons of orthodoxy.)
 
Shadow Serious said:
Innocent insofar as respect to a court of law, yes. A pointless war, maybe. Targeted taxation? This goes far beyond that
Click to expand...

Murder is still worse, by far.

My issue is that suppressing the Freedom of Association is worse than the targeting of a few (read: 4) individuals in a Police Action (read: undeclared war) on a cultural movement that has no direct support from a Nation State and that is hostile to the Culture and Beliefs of our people.
Click to expand...

We've killed thousands of innocent people. Tens of thousands.

Again the IRS simply could have denied their request by 3 months due to inherent political advocacy, but then the groups could go appeal that and that would have been inconvenient and the groups might have won and been able to effect the elections such that Democrats might have lost seats and of course Obama could not have that. The groups targeted were largely conservative and even those few that were progressive I have my suspicions that they too might have been targeted (for reasons of orthodoxy.)
Click to expand...

Murder is still worse, by far.
 
Quik said:
Murder is still worse, by far.
Click to expand...

In YOUR opinion yes. My opinion is that for good or for ill the State has a limited power to kill (which would not be murder.) Since the ones that were killed by the government were not only advocating but giving material support for the murder of American Civilians and Destruction of Vital and Infrastructure AND since they cannnot be captured and their support was significant then that left the option to Sanction them and while I dislike that option I do not begrudge it and in the place of Obama I would be forced to the same.



We've killed thousands of innocent people. Tens of thousands.
Click to expand...

Maybe the War Powers Act should be repealed and the President must have a Declaration of War to limit this. In a war non-combatants die often even where attempts are made to limit their number.



Murder is still worse, by far.
Click to expand...

In YOUR opinion yes. My opinion is that for good or for ill the State has a limited power to kill (which would not be murder.) Since the ones that were killed by the government were not only advocating but giving material support for the murder of American Civilians and Destruction of Vital Infrastructure AND since they cannnot be captured and their support was significant then that left the option to Sanction them and while I dislike that option I do not begrudge it and in the place of Obama I would be forced to the same.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom