• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Would you support a single world goverment system under Islamic rule?

Would you support a single world government under Islamic rule?


  • Total voters
    64
I wouldn't support any single world government system irrespective of the rule.

and :lol: at the Islam example.
 
Mark Steyn once alluded to the notion that liberals, in general, wouldn't really care if the world were ruled by Islam. Those weren't his exact words, but that was the general idea. I wanted to test his theory.

I've never heard of this Mark Steyn, but I already know that his head is filled with hot gasses.
 
I've never heard of this Mark Steyn, but I already know that his head is filled with hot gasses.
-----------------
He's actually a really smart guy (British accent helps).
He just says wacky things to sell books.
Think Ann Coulter.
 
-----------------
He's actually a really smart guy (British accent helps).
He just says wacky things to sell books.
Think Ann Coulter.

I don't know anything about him, so I'll accept the possibility that he's smart. But suggesting that liberals wouldn't mind if the world were ruled by Islam isn't a great way to sound smart.
 
Because Islam is growing at an astonishing rate, and parts of it are aggressively seeking converts. It only makes sense that Islam would be more than happy to accept this mantle.[/QUOTE]
------------
Probably so.
I'm sure many Christians would accept that mantle also.
It would be for the world's own good....allegedly.
 
I would like a One World Government if I could run it. I've pretty much figured out everything and I'm certain I could do a good job. But it would have to be secular or, over time, as I prove myself right again and again, I could be Deified and we could get rid of all these terribly dated religions and constitutions.

And before you go off on me about this, think about it and tell me you don't already covet my future. I'll make the world a lot more interesting than it is now.
 
-----------------

He just says wacky things to sell books.
Think Ann Coulter.

Yeah, this.

He's the male version of Ann Coulter.
 
I don't know anything about him, so I'll accept the possibility that he's smart. But suggesting that liberals wouldn't mind if the world were ruled by Islam isn't a great way to sound smart.
--------------------
He's pandering to a certain niche market.
He guest hosts for Limbaugh.
 
There should have been an additional poll choice of "Not only no, but Hell NO."
 
-----------------
He's actually a really smart guy (British accent helps).
He just says wacky things to sell books.
Think Ann Coulter.

Well I've been skimming his articles and he sounds indistinguishable from any of the other fearmongering, xenophobic and divisive dickwads out there. He has a simple message for a specific audience that is intended to have one impact alone: anger. I saw no unique insight at all.
 
I would like a One World Government if I could run it. I've pretty much figured out everything and I'm certain I could do a good job. But it would have to be secular or, over time, as I prove myself right again and again, I could be Deified and we could get rid of all these terribly dated religions and constitutions.And before you go off on me about this, think about it and tell me you don't already covet my future. I'll make the world a lot more interesting than it is now.
---------------
Uh-oh.
I feel the same way about myself.
We'll have to engage in a titanic battle of the megalomaniacs.
Dibs on the TV rights.
 
Well I've been skimming his articles and he sounds indistinguishable from any of the other fearmongering, xenophobic and divisive dickwads out there. He has a simple message for a specific audience that is intended to have one impact alone: anger. I saw no unique insight at all.
-------------
Bingo.
 
Exactly the response I expected. But I'm the one who brought it up so I get dibs (?). Dibs? Why do I know that word?




---------------
Uh-oh.
I feel the same way about myself.
We'll have to engage in a titanic battle of the megalomaniacs.
Dibs on the TV rights.
 
Exactly the response I expected. But I'm the one who brought it up so I get dibs (?). Dibs? Why do I know that word?
--------
I'd say it's because you're old, but since I know the word, that can't be it.
We must just be a couple of young, happening guys who somehow know all these old-school words.
Yeah.....that's it.
 
It is not a delusion. It is perhaps the subject of a pending Court case, but it is not delusion.
Don't mind Cephus. He's the most rabid Atheist on the forum.

The fact that 84% of the world subscribes to some or other religion, equates (in his mind) with 'largely moving past religion'.
 
One pattern we tend to see is once growth of the population occurs within another country either through immigration, outpacing the birthrates of the other citizens or both; they eventually become the overwhelming majority then take steps toward secession and independence of their region. Not everywhere but in many places. Can't complain, its democracy and self-determination in action.
You just did.

Population modelling is fraught with artificiality. It's the ultimate paper argument. A vacuum of supposition and irresponsible extrapolation. What some nowadays put a trendy spin on and refer to as 'diversity', is no more than a continuation of a historically ubiquitous feature.

For the record, do you support Democracy?
 
I wouldn't support a world government of any kind at this time. Once we have permanent martian and moon colonies and mining outposts in the asteroids belt then maybe. For now, we're not ready for any kind of world government and I sure don't want it to be any kind of theocracy. Religion creates enough problems even when it's not the government.

I would have to agree with you here MS.....we are in, "No way" ready for the Federation. Besides the Nation of Islam hasn't put a Rocket up into Space and colonized the Planet Klingon yet. :lol:
 
Mark Steyn once alluded to the notion that liberals, in general, wouldn't really care if the world were ruled by Islam. Those weren't his exact words, but that was the general idea. I wanted to test his theory.

I would highly doubt that ANY female liberal would ever support this ideology. It goes against EVERYTHING they stand for.
 
Certainly not. I wouldn't want to live somewhere ruled by any strict religious rules, be they christian, muslim, jewish, whatever.
 
Two people chose yes? :shock:
 
Where is the double NO option?
NO - to single government ruling the world!
NO - to living under Islamic rule of any kind!

Fallen.
 
I've never heard of this Mark Steyn, but I already know that his head is filled with hot gasses.
He doesn't know you either, and there's good reason for this: He is a prolific Conservative, and you are not.
 
Would you support a single world goverment system under Islamic rule?

Sure, why the **** not?

I really can't imagine anything more plausible than a single, totalitarian world government ruling through sharia.
 
Because Islam is growing at an astonishing rate, and parts of it are aggressively seeking converts. It only makes sense that Islam would be more than happy to accept this mantle.
Empty paranoia. The Muslims aren't going to take over the world.
 
Back
Top Bottom