• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Huckabee: Benghazi will drive Obama from office

Your opinion

  • Total voters
    79
mak2 said:
I said what I think in the post above, we will see. Heck, I might be wrong, I know you wont believe this but I ahve been wrong before.
Click to expand...

Cmon Mak.....that's not what I asked. I asked if Obama and his Team stated those thing out their mouths to the American people, and your response to that and that part alone.
 
MMC said:
th


These ones.....yes they were already sent to her.
Click to expand...
Do these picture mean she is responsible for his death??
 
Jack Hays said:
I doubt that Benghazi will drive BHO from office, but I suspect tomorrow's hearing will confirm that the administration acted dishonorably and reported events dishonestly. The narrative is likely to become increasingly corrosive thereafter. Hillary is more likely to be critically damaged than BHO.:cool:
Click to expand...

Fox News:roll:
 
bubbabgone said:
Agreed. But it's not like she could have gotten Susie Rice to agree to spread the epidemic lie without her BFF Obama agreeing to it since he had his own interests at stake.
Click to expand...

Fair enough, but if the WH determines that they have to throw Hillary under the bus to protect BHO then that's what they'll do.:cool:
 
pbrauer said:
Do these picture mean she is responsible for his death??
Click to expand...

Did it happen on her watch.....and truthfully according to the reports he wasn't Dead in these pics so that may be her excuse should she run for the Presidency.
According to the reports he died in the Hospital they took him too.
 
MMC said:
Did it happen on her watch.....and truthfully according to the reports he wasn't Dead in these pics so that may be her excuse should she run for the Presidency.
According to the reports he died in the Hospital they took him too.
Click to expand...
Is this the first consulate ever to be attacked? Isn't this just another Vince Foster?
 
mak2 said:
Benghazi returning as big scandal - Salon.com

This article is about how I think things will work out, it will blow over and it will be Faux's fault.
Click to expand...

The author didn't say it was going to blow over. What I read sounded like he was saying "Now THESE guys sound genuine, unlike Fox." as a way to excuse his hands-off of the story for 8 months.

From the piece, what the hell could this possibly mean ... "Unlike the vast majority of the new information brought forward by the conservative media since the attack, the three whistle-blowers seem credible."...
since the W.B. merely confirmed what Fox had been saying. So what were the "... bogus story lines on Benghazi" the author claims. The example he mentioned ... wasn't.
 
pbrauer said:
Huckabee: Benghazi will drive Obama from office - Mackenzie Weinger - POLITICO.com

Agree

Disagree

I hope so

I hope not

Republicans are nuts
Click to expand...

Right now I am just sitting back, watching, listening and waiting. Ever since Watergate drove Nixon from office, every out of power party has tried to drive the sitting president out, Watergate style. So as of this point in time, I take no stance one way or the other. Time will tell, it always does.

But if the president had a hand in keeping people from testifying, which I doubt, they perhaps he should be impeached. If he told the military to stand down when they could have made it on time, that may fall into the dumb decision category, but a lot depends on what the Libyan government would authorize or not. He may have thought it was over after the first attack and who knew that there would be a second one. I am not making excuses, but it is hard in these situations to put oneself in anyone of the participant’s shoes.

So many times over the years, I have seen various administrations try to hide a embarrassing detail or event which later develops into something big. If they had just admitted it in the first, headline news for a couple of weeks and then it is over. Americans are a forgiving people, most Americans that is. I’ll not take a guess as to what happened or when. I think all of us know, Obama supporters and those who want him out of the White House to those non-committal and those who do not care, that no video caused the attacks in Libya and the president on down knew this. Outside of that, putting for bogus talking points, which again all presidents have at one time or another, is wrong, but is no impeachable offense. Politicians lie, that is one reason that far more Americans distrust their government than do.

Time will tell.
 
pbrauer said:
Is this the first consulate ever to be attacked? Isn't this just another Vince Foster?
Click to expand...

No it is not the first one ever attacked.....but it is the First one that was attacked more than once and even given a direct threat that the attackers would be back. Which then they tried to kill the Brits Ambassador and they attacked the Red Cross offices.
 
I added it will blow over. I believe it will. These guys are probably genuine but they are not testifying to all the wackiness Faux has been alleging, the most damaging info leaked so far is an obvious attempt to control what is reported on. Not exactly hiding in his bedroom and refusing to come out. Again, we will see. These guys might be creditable, but they do not know what was going on from the top down.
bubbabgone said:
The author didn't say it was going to blow over. What I read sounded like he was saying "Now THESE guys sound genuine, unlike Fox." as a way to excuse his hands-off of the story for 8 months.

From the piece, what the hell could this possibly mean ... "Unlike the vast majority of the new information brought forward by the conservative media since the attack, the three whistle-blowers seem credible."...
since the W.B. merely confirmed what Fox had been saying. So what were the "... bogus story lines on Benghazi" the author claims. The example he mentioned ... wasn't.
Click to expand...
 
mak2 said:
I added it will blow over. I believe it will. These guys are probably genuine but they are not testifying to all the wackiness Faux has been alleging, the most damaging info leaked so far is an obvious attempt to control what is reported on. Not exactly hiding in his bedroom and refusing to come out. Again, we will see. These guys might be creditable, but they do not know what was going on from the top down.
Click to expand...

How would the CSG not know from the top on down?
 
Jack Hays said:
Fair enough, but if the WH determines that they have to throw Hillary under the bus to protect BHO then that's what they'll do.:cool:
Click to expand...

Maybe ... but they won't leave any fingerprints if they do.

I posted this already today but it seems appropriate again now so ... well, I'm doin' it anyway.

Hillary's Bold New Strategy
benghazi - hillary - testifying.jpg​
 
mak2 said:
I added it will blow over. I believe it will. These guys are probably genuine but
they are not testifying to all the wackiness Faux has been alleging
Click to expand...
, the most damaging info leaked so far is an obvious attempt to control what is reported on. Not exactly hiding in his bedroom and refusing to come out. Again, we will see. These guys might be creditable, but they do not know what was going on from the top down.
Click to expand...

I'll ask you because the Salon guy didn't say what he was talking about ... what wackiness did Fox allege? Not what did someone allege they alleged.
 
Jack Hays said:
Fair enough, but if the WH determines that they have to throw Hillary under the bus to protect BHO then that's what they'll do.:cool:
Click to expand...

That would provide viewers with a very interesting power play, with the various wagons being circled, because we do not know if she intends to run in 2016...even though she has stated many times she is not interested! :wow:

Good evening, Jack. :2wave:
 
pbrauer said:
What does he say?
Click to expand...

He says: They knew it was a terrorist attack from the start, and reported as such. The Ambassador's last words to him were that they were under attack. He had a small contingent of US special ops troops at the embassy in Tripoli and they were ready to go immediately to Benghazi but were ordered to stand down. He urged a flyover by US fighter aircraft if only to bluff the attackers; that was denied. No one ever contacted him to discuss what had happened, and when he called in to say that Rice's Sunday talk show performance had been inaccurate, he was pushed aside.:cool:
 
bubbabgone said:
It's finding its' way into the rest of the MSM, Bonzy...but, no, not very enthusiastically.
Click to expand...

Is that what FoxNews is telling you? LOL......wow....you would think that people would realize that they are being duped.
 
polgara said:
That would provide viewers with a very interesting power play, with the various wagons being circled, because we do not know if she intends to run in 2016...even though she has stated many times she is not interested! :wow:

Good evening, Jack. :2wave:
Click to expand...

Good evening, Polgara.:2wave:
I think she wants to run. Who knows? Maybe Biden is pushing the Benghazi story.:lol:
 
bubbabgone said:
I'll ask you because the Salon guy didn't say what he was talking about ... what wackiness did Fox allege? Not what did someone allege they alleged.
Click to expand...

They just had that Attorney on 560 Am radio.....here is a kicker. She was accused of being a hack cuz she works for the Repubs. But now she just got down reporting her client. Is a Democrat that voted for Hillary.

That when the ARB conducted their interview with her client. That Demo Staffers were in the room the entire time and participated. Which is suppose to be a No No. So she is saying her client's career was being threatened.
 
Everything from there was a division of Marines very close, special forces nearby, an AC 130 or an armed drone overhead and on and on. I have heard all of this stuff mentioned by various talking heads on Faux, which I know isnt really "faux". BUt I aint looking them all up for you. If you want you can pretend I and everyone else that heard it are making it up, I really dont care, I know you know or you would not have asked. Fox embarrassed itself on this one, well maybe not as bad as the Obama's Katrina thing, but still.
bubbabgone said:
I'll ask you because the Salon guy didn't say what he was talking about ... what wackiness did Fox allege? Not what did someone allege they alleged.
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom