• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Huckabee: Benghazi will drive Obama from office

Your opinion


  • Total voters
    79
Knocking Hillary down several notches is obviously the goal in the Benghazi story line, the GOP knows she will be tough to beat if she decides to run in 2016.

How Ya like the those Pic of Stevens......see Hillary will have that wherever she goes. Then brought up in way.....where Good Ole Hillary will be told. Yes......YOU are responsible for Stevens Death.

To Watch her go into Melt-down mode.....will be something this country will enjoy for all of Eternity!

Do you think they have shown her the Pics I have already sent to her. To show her whats waiting for her to crawl out her bug hole.
 
How Ya like the those Pic of Stevens......see Hillary will have that wherever she goes. Then brought up in way.....where Good Ole Hillary will be told. Yes......YOU are responsible for Stevens Death.

To Watch her go into Melt-down mode.....will be something this country will enjoy for all of Eternity!

Do you think they have shown her the Pics I have already sent to her. To show her whats waiting for her to crawl out her bug hole.

I'm sure that you have her shaking in her boots.
 
Okie Dokie....you just keep playing that card and sees where it gets ya....... I'm looking forward to 8 more years of Democratic rule.

Oh I will.....and just like when she brought her azz around here last time. I will be one of the ones Right Out there in Front. See I am 10 times better off the cuff than Obama is. So let her engage. ;)
 
Oh what wonderful fantasies one can conjour up while sitting in their parents basement watching FauxNews.....
 
Oh what wonderful fantasies one can conjour up while sitting in their parents basement watching FauxNews.....

At 62 I own the basement OUTRIGHT. Do you think my Veterans loan helped me to do that.

:lamo Parents.....did your Democratic Underground give you that talking point. Or is that something you are use to.....your relatives paying your way?
 
Yeah, We just need the pics of Stevens and the 3 other dead.....then we have the Committees that came out with Clintons Incompetency. I can't Wait to release the Pics of Stevens Bodies being dragged around by some Libyans. ALL bloodied up and his body stripped. With him being Dead.

U_S_20Ambassador_xlarge.jpeg


Looks like I am all prepared to come up with something better.....huh. But you can keep looking Forward with your Hope and Prayer.

U can say Goodbye to Hillary's Future Political Aspirations. :lamo

I'm of this opinion that if anyone tries to use the dead body of our ambassador for political gain, it will trigger outrage toward and backfire on the side that does it. I guess we'll see in 2016. The stuff that the right thinks should fire people up has proven to backfire on us consistently. This even if the ultimate GOP candidate distances himself and denounces it. People took what republicans said that offended people out on Mitt Romney on election day. With all due respect, even your post ends with :lamo and could sound like you're celebrating the murder of an American by Al Qaeda because it helps the GOP (or hurts the Democrats). That kind of stuff might excite people who have already made up their minds on with deep emotion on who they want to see elected, or don't want to see elected but IMHO will drive a lot of people away.
 
Here is Obama's MASSIVE problem:

1. During the campaign he claimed to have used the word "terrorism" in is speech.
2. Then blamed the video and angry mob lie began in the days that followed.

Obama laid his own trap and has hung himself with it.

He never thought he would be caught... but FOX NEWS pursued the story when Obama's journ-O-lists wanted to and did lay down on the job.


LOL.....alrighty!!! The only people who think that Benghazi is scoring any points for republicans are the idiots that watch FoxNews and believe what they are hearing. The vast majority of Americans see this for what it is, right-wing gamemanship...that didn't sell the first time.

"Right-wing gamesmanship"? Is that the best you can do to defend an administration that:

1. Failed to protect a consulate in a terrorist zone.
2. Failed to heed the pleas of those in the terror zone.
3. Failed to send assistance to thse in the terror zone.
4. Told those who could have assisted to stand own.
5. Lied about the root cause of the attack.
6. Pissed in the face of the Libyan government.
7. Caused delays for the investigation in Benghazi.
8. Threatened those who are to come forward and testify.

Nobody died during Watergate. It was the coverup that cost Nixon.

Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young created an anthem because of "4 dead in Ohio." Remember?

Tin soldiers and Nixon's comin'.
We're finally on our own.
This summer I hear the drummin'.
Four dead in Ohio.

Gotta get down to it.
Soldiers are gunning us down.
Should have been done long ago.
What if you knew her and
Found her dead on the ground?
How can you run when you know?


You have Democrats shooting at the administration...
“Well, it was scrubbed,” Massachusetts Democratic Rep. Steve Lynch told “Fox News Sunday.” “It was totally inaccurate. There's no excuse for that. It was false information. And what they try to do is harmonize what happened in Benghazi with what happened everywhere else across the Middle East.”

Lynch also acknowledged the talking points were likely revised to reflect President Obama’s claim – with his re-election bid in the balance -- that “Al Qaeda is on the run.”
Maryland Democratic Rep. Dutch Ruppersberger, the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, also acknowledged Sunday the facts as told by Rice were wrong.

“At the time, as it turns out” the information was incorrect, he said on CBS’ “Face the Nation”

Ruppersberger, who was briefed by the CIA about the attacks in immediate aftermath,

No soldiers and Obama's runn'in.
Hey boys we're on our own.
He sent our Saviors pack'in.
Four dead in Libya.

Gotta get down to it.
Terrorists are gunning us down.
Should have been gone long ago.
What if you knew them and
Found them dead on the ground?
How can you run when you know?
###
Obama... how could you?
How could you tell the troops to stand down?
How could you lie to the families?
How could you lie to the nation?
How could you?
 
Last edited:
I'm of this opinion that if anyone tries to use the dead body of our ambassador for political gain, it will trigger outrage toward and backfire on the side that does it. I guess we'll see in 2016. The stuff that the right thinks should fire people up has proven to backfire on us consistently. This even if the ultimate GOP candidate distances himself and denounces it. People took what republicans said that offended people out on Mitt Romney on election day. With all due respect, even your post ends with :lamo and could sound like you're celebrating the murder of an American by Al Qaeda because it helps the GOP (or hurts the Democrats). That kind of stuff might excite people who have already made up their minds on with deep emotion on who they want to see elected, or don't want to see elected but IMHO will drive a lot of people away.

Yeah usually that is the case.....but this time we are going with those Democratic tactics. What helps change this up is having those that know how to respond off the cuff. Which Repub just aren't that good at doing so. Well.....they use to have that problem. Not anymore! ;)
 
Were you that confused to think the President of Libya and other overseas care about US News Media Outlets......yeah I figured like all the rest. Ya's just cant figure out that Foreign Policy Play. Although it is dealing with Foreign Affairs. U know where the Big Boyz Play.....and your girl. Couldn't muster up to do even an adequate job.

Let me know when you got something that can debunk Benghazi. Rather than just talking ****! :lol:

I did catch Huckabee's performance. he really is a good orator and it was a very stirring presentation. I am sure it stirred up the wing nut base. Which, after all, is what Faux does.

Okie Dokie....you just keep playing that card and sees where it gets ya....... I'm looking forward to 8 more years of Democratic rule.

I doubt that Benghazi will drive BHO from office, but I suspect tomorrow's hearing will confirm that the administration acted dishonorably and reported events dishonestly. The narrative is likely to become increasingly corrosive thereafter. Hillary is more likely to be critically damaged than BHO.:cool:
 
If FauxNews had any credibility with the majority of Americans it might just get you somewhere. But the FauxNews created feigned outrage propoganda isn't resonating with the American public because they set it for what it is. Seriously....if it didn't sell the first 153 times they tried to sell it, what makes the wingnuts think that we'll buy it the 154 time?
 
If FauxNews had any credibility with the majority of Americans it might just get you somewhere. But the FauxNews created feigned outrage propoganda isn't resonating with the American public because they set it for what it is. Seriously....if it didn't sell the first 153 times they tried to sell it, what makes the wingnuts think that we'll buy it the 154 time?

Too bad the UK Guardian and the UK Daily Mail aren't Fox News......should have been keeping up on things, rather than riding the back seat and yelling FOX. FAUXNEWS. FAUX outrage. But those Antics do make for a good really good show! ;)
 
If FauxNews had any credibility with the majority of Americans it might just get you somewhere. But the FauxNews created feigned outrage propoganda isn't resonating with the American public because they set it for what it is. Seriously....if it didn't sell the first 153 times they tried to sell it, what makes the wingnuts think that we'll buy it the 154 time?

Eyewitness testimony.:cool:
 
Too bad the UK Guardian and the UK Daily Mail aren't Fox News......should have been keeping up on things, rather than riding the back seat and yelling FOX. FAUXNEWS. FAUX outrage. But those Antics do make for a good really good show! ;)

Because , you know, we all trust the ragsheets, I mean, highly reputable newspapers of Britain......................
 
How Ya like the those Pic of Stevens......see Hillary will have that wherever she goes. Then brought up in way.....where Good Ole Hillary will be told. Yes......YOU are responsible for Stevens Death.

To Watch her go into Melt-down mode.....will be something this country will enjoy for all of Eternity!

Do you think they have shown her the Pics I have already sent to her. To show her whats waiting for her to crawl out her bug hole.
What pictures?.. you sent them to her?
 
I voted disagree because, honestly, no one cares that Americans were killed in Libya. The American public has gotten so use to its citizens dying during our now 10 year War on Terror that a few more people killed in yet another bastion of Islam really isn't a big deal to them.

I do believe the situation was handled improperly after the fact, however, I do not believe there was anything that could have been done to prevent it in the first place.
 
Because , you know, we all trust the ragsheets, I mean, highly reputable newspapers of Britain......................

Well I have AP, Reuters, UPI, CNN, Prada, Al, Jazerra, Press TV, Israeli News, Asian Times all to go with them. As well as all US sources. Got any out now?

Let me Guess.....All of them are Wrong. But Team Obama and the Democrats aren't.....Right? :roll:
 
What I think probably happened is there was only so much resources for the US Govt to distribute to our overseas assets. Every government unit wants more of everything all the time. SO it is not surprising they asked for more security. There is never enough resources to protect everybody from every threat. Alqueda probably planned well and attacked a weakness, that is what enemies do. I do think the Obama administration probably did want to control what the press reported, there was an election going on. I believe at first the Administration probably did not really know what was going on. When the fertilizer place blew up it was days before they ruled out terrorism officially. When it gets right down to it I think a combination of bad luck and good enemy recon of our assets is what got our people killed. Had the Admin hardened that site enough to repel that attack AQ would have just exploited another weakness somewhere else. I think this is what will come out. NOw look at what Faux has done. It has reported (or had talking heads on their news programs saying things, I know that is a sore spot with the Fauxites) there were all kinds of assets all over the place Obama could have used, but just would not because he did want anyone to think it was terrorism, this concept is sooo stupid I think people are beginning to see though that even if they dont want to, Faux had to be reporting fact not in evidence like the AC 130 or the drone overhead, or the unit of Marines or Special forces or...well the list goes on and on. If Obama had sent assets into a firefight that alone would have gotten him more votes than any other single action even more if they all got killed. THe RW has jumped the shark on this one, especially Faux, but as if it cant get any sillyier the RW continues to double down on it. I did hear Rush not long after the election doing a skit on his radio show where obama went to his room and slammed the door having a baby fit. I have heard that worked into the accusations from the right, on this board and on radio talk shows. I really think the only place the RW will win more eliections is Sillyville. We will see.
If FauxNews had any credibility with the majority of Americans it might just get you somewhere. But the FauxNews created feigned outrage propoganda isn't resonating with the American public because they set it for what it is. Seriously....if it didn't sell the first 153 times they tried to sell it, what makes the wingnuts think that we'll buy it the 154 time?
 
Well I have AP, Reuters, UPI, CNN, Prada, Al, Jazerra, Press TV, Israeli News, Asian Times all to go with them. As well as all US sources. Got any out now?

Let me Guess.....All of them are Wrong. But Team Obama and the Democrats aren't.....Right? :roll:

You can claim that, but I listen to the news and it seems to be a fixation isolated to Fox and "friends"..................
 
What I think probably happened is there was only so much resources for the US Govt to distribute to our overseas assets. Every government unit wants more of everything all the time. SO it is not surprising they asked for more security. There is never enough resources to protect everybody from every threat. Alqueda probably planned well and attacked a weakness, that is what enemies do. I do think the Obama administration probably did want to control what the press reported, there was an election going on. I believe at first the Administration probably did not really know what was going on. When the fertilizer place blew up it was days before they ruled out terrorism officially. When it gets right down to it I think a combination of bad luck and good enemy recon of our assets is what got our people killed. Had the Admin hardened that site enough to repel that attack AQ would have just exploited another weakness somewhere else. I think this is what will come out. NOw look at what Faux has done. It has reported (or had talking heads on their news programs saying things, I know that is a sore spot with the Fauxites) there were all kinds of assets all over the place Obama could have used, but just would not because he did want anyone to think it was terrorism, this concept is sooo stupid I think people are beginning to see though that even if they dont want to, Faux had to be reporting fact not in evidence like the AC 130 or the drone overhead, or the unit of Marines or Special forces or...well the list goes on and on. If Obama had sent assets into a firefight that alone would have gotten him more votes than any other single action even more if they all got killed. THe RW has jumped the shark on this one, especially Faux, but as if it cant get any sillyier the RW continues to double down on it. I did hear Rush not long after the election doing a skit on his radio show where obama went to his room and slammed the door having a baby fit. I have heard that worked into the accusations from the right, on this board and on radio talk shows. I really think the only place the RW will win more eliections is Sillyville. We will see.

Heya Mak. :2wave: Haven't figured out that part about the Libyans warning us 3 days ahead of the attack. Is there any way that team Obama can deny this? IS there anyway that team Obama can Deny that they stated AQ was not involved and that the Attack on Benghazi was Predetermined and pre-planned.

Just those Questions there.....Can this Administration deny what they Stated and is down on record and with all News Sources?

Now that they cannot deny this.....did they falsely report to the American people that AQ was not involved in the Attack on Benghazi? What is your response to this.....Did Obama and his Team Tell the American People AQ was not involved and that the Attack was not a planned attack?
 
I doubt that Benghazi will drive BHO from office, but I suspect tomorrow's hearing will confirm that the administration acted dishonorably and reported events dishonestly. The narrative is likely to become increasingly corrosive thereafter.
Hillary is more likely to be critically damaged than BHO
.:cool:

Agreed. But it's not like she could have gotten Susie Rice to agree to spread the epidemic lie without her BFF Obama agreeing to it since he had his own interests at stake.
 
I said what I think in the post above, we will see. Heck, I might be wrong, I know you wont believe this but I ahve been wrong before.
Heya Mak. :2wave: Haven't figured out that part about the Libyans warning us 3 days ahead of the attack. Is there any way that team Obama can deny this? IS there anyway that team Obama can Deny that they stated AQ was not involved and that the Attack on Benghazi was Predetermined and pre-planned.

Just those Questions there.....Can this Administration deny what they Stated and is down on record and with all News Sources?

Now that they cannot deny this.....did they falsely report to the American people that AQ was not involved in the Attack on Benghazi? What is your response to this.....Did Obama and his Team Tell the American People AQ was not involved and that the Attack was not a planned attack?
 
You can claim that, but I listen to the news and it seems to be a fixation isolated to Fox and "friends"..................

Yeah.....not only can I claim that. I also have on this site here in all the Benghazi threads. All those new Sources. So I can also Validate what I have. Which that can't be disputed.
 
You can claim that, but I listen to the news and it seems to be a fixation isolated to Fox and "friends"..................

It's finding its' way into the rest of the MSM, Bonzy...but, no, not very enthusiastically.
 
Back
Top Bottom