• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

a gay president ?

gay president ??

  • Total voters
    81
AGENT J said:
gay has ZERO to do with any of this. WOW LMAO this cant be a real post
Click to expand...

So you're telling me that their being gay doesn't affect their decision making ability?
 
If a gay candidate was the best option, then yes. As long as he wasn't an activist, gay or otherwise.
 
It would only matter to me if they were in the closet because that opens them up to blackmail by foreign intelligence agents.
 
AGENT J said:
im not sure thats a good thing

but either way im still hoping they post why, im curious of the logic and rational
Click to expand...

If you understand conditional probability then you should understand why I said no. Read my sig block again if you need to. Based on a history of disagreeing with most of the gays, odds aren't too good I'd agree with a gay candidate. Even if I did, then you'll have the gay minions with expectations just like Obama's black minions wanting Obama phones and the bacon brought to Detroit in return for voting for him.
 
I'd rather have a gay president with some type of executive experience, rather than some community activist.
 
Jango said:
I voted no.

Unless the gay man is more like a straight guy (in the way he thinks about intelligence, the military, the world and people...other important topics), then I don't think he's qualified to be Commander in Chief. Because if he's that "fabulous" type, how liberal is he going to be with things that are REALLY important to the safety and survival of our people and assets here and worldwide. I'll tell you, he's going to be super-liberal, to an extent that we've never seen before, and probably would never recover from.
Click to expand...

If they are "super liberal" they won't make it past the primary. Next you will say Obama is liberal. The last thing I would want in charge of our nuclear arsenal is one of those super conservative born-again types who couldn't care less if the world ended. Yet we survived Bush II. The other crap is too offensive to reply.
 
Muhammed said:
It would only matter to me if they were in the closet because that opens them up to blackmail by foreign intelligence agents.
Click to expand...

Well it worked for Eleanor Roosevelt.
 
Gathomas88 said:
I'm not dead set against it, but he/she would have to show themselves to be so socially and economically Right Wing in every other regard that they made Ronald Reagan look like Al Gore before I'd even consider voting for them. Needless to say, a gay version of Chris Cristie or John McCain wouldn't make the cut.

Frankly, I'd be more than a little concerned that a member of such an extreme minority group managed to make it into the runnngs for the presidency in the first place. It would smack of a certain degree of demagoguery in my mind to say the least.

Are we putting them up for election because they will best represent the interests of average Americans, or because they're a "token" homosexual and party strategists figure that support for homosexuality happens to be in vogue at the moment?

It's a question worth considering.
Click to expand...

interesting to see the ones who dont understand the question are usually anti gay :confused:

or not interesting
 
Jango said:
I voted no.

Unless the gay man is more like a straight guy (in the way he thinks about intelligence, the military, the world and people...other important topics), then I don't think he's qualified to be Commander in Chief. Because if he's that "fabulous" type, how liberal is he going to be with things that are REALLY important to the safety and survival of our people and assets here and worldwide. I'll tell you, he's going to be super-liberal, to an extent that we've never seen before, and probably would never recover from.
Click to expand...

have you ever heard of " Margaret thatcher "?

a stronger leader than many world leaders

what is more if he is the president of USA

he would

but people always fabricate excuses in order not to see the fact ..
 
Mathematician said:
If you understand conditional probability then you should understand why I said no. Read my sig block again if you need to. Based on a history of disagreeing with most of the gays, odds aren't too good I'd agree with a gay candidate. Even if I did, then you'll have the gay minions with expectations just like Obama's black minions wanting Obama phones and the bacon brought to Detroit in return for voting for him.
Click to expand...


both racism and gay hate

l hope ru paul is elected as president.
 
Medusa said:
would you vote for a gay presidential candidate ?
Click to expand...

Well, I'd have to know more than that before I made a decision so I'm not really sure. But the candidate being gay wouldn't make me not vote for them.
 
molten_dragon said:
Well, I'd have to know more than that before I made a decision so I'm not really sure. But the candidate being gay wouldn't make me not vote for them.
Click to expand...

if l asked " would you vote for a hetero president ?

:lol:
 
Medusa said:
if l asked " would you vote for a hetero president ?

:lol:
Click to expand...

My answer would be the same. Sexual orientation alone is not enough information for me to decide whether or not I would vote for someone.
 
molten_dragon said:
My answer would be the same. Sexual orientation alone is not enough information for me to decide whether or not I would vote for someone.
Click to expand...

l didnt ask if you would vote for a canditate just because he was gay
 
Medusa said:
l didnt ask if you would vote for a canditate just because he was gay
Click to expand...

The only information you gave about the candidate was that he was gay. I cannot determine if I would vote for a candidate based solely on that information. I get what you were trying to ask, but you didn't really ask it in the right way.

The question you really should have asked was "Would you vote against a candidate solely because they were gay".
 
molten_dragon said:
The only information you gave about the candidate was that he was gay. I cannot determine if I would vote for a candidate based solely on that information. I get what you were trying to ask, but you didn't really ask it in the right way.

The question you really should have asked was "Would you vote against a candidate solely because they were gay".
Click to expand...

:doh............
 
Jango said:
So you're telling me that their being gay doesn't affect their decision making ability?
Click to expand...

Affect their ABILITY? No, it doesn't affect their ability. It may affect the actual decision, not the ability.
 
Voting for someone just because they are gay is not right It would be bad to have the first gay president drag this country down than people will be less likely to vote in another gay president ( even if there the best choice ) , but than again we had many terrible straight presidents and people sill voted them in some even twice ( not naming any names )
 
Medusa said:
interesting to see the ones who dont understand the question are usually anti gay :confused:

or not interesting
Click to expand...

I understand the queston fine. Given today's political climate, I merely don't believe that the matter would be as simplistic as a lot of people here seem to think.
 
Jango said:
I voted no.

Unless the gay man is more like a straight guy (in the way he thinks about intelligence, the military, the world and people...other important topics), then I don't think he's qualified to be Commander in Chief. Because if he's that "fabulous" type, how liberal is he going to be with things that are REALLY important to the safety and survival of our people and assets here and worldwide. I'll tell you, he's going to be super-liberal, to an extent that we've never seen before, and probably would never recover from.
Click to expand...
So what you are saying is that you want him to dumb down. You also say guy. Does this mean you don't ever think there might be a lesbian running for president?
 
Gathomas88 said:
I understand the queston fine. Given today's political climate, I merely don't believe that the matter would be as simplistic as a lot of people here seem to think.
Click to expand...

this world has always been governed by gays and that is why we have lots of problems

so as a result of this fact we cant trust any gay
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom