• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Is Romney positioning to work for the Obama admin on Homeland security?

Is Romney positioning to work for the Obama admin on Homeland security?


  • Total voters
    7
Romney, gave credit where Credit was due'.. IMO , I don't forsee Him In homeland security with Obama As Potus'
 
I really don't think so, it's amazing though how likable Romney sounded when he spoke to Wolf Blitzer. Perhaps he would have faired better in the election if he spoke like that in the campaign.
 
I really don't think so, it's amazing though how likable Romney sounded when he spoke to Wolf Blitzer. Perhaps he would have faired better in the election if he spoke like that in the campaign.

He did. It's only after he's safely no longer able to win the Presidency that all y'all might notice he doesn't spew hellfire from his mouth.
 
He did. It's only after he's safely no longer able to win the Presidency that all y'all might notice he doesn't spew hellfire from his mouth.

Perhaps you don't remember Romney accused President Obama of 'dividind America' or Running a campaign of anger. :roll:
 
Perhaps you don't remember Romney accused President Obama of 'dividind America' or Running a campaign of anger. :roll:

He's correct on both counts. Doesn't mean he wasn't "likable."
 
Romney is still a slimy political chameleon whose agenda keeps changing with the wind.
 
He's correct on both counts. Doesn't mean he wasn't "likable."
Apparently the voting public liked Obama more, he receive almost 5 million more votes than Romney. :thumbs:


Obama 65,899,660
Romney 60,932,152
 
He did. It's only after he's safely no longer able to win the Presidency that all y'all might notice he doesn't spew hellfire from his mouth.

Did anyone think Romney spewed hellfire from his mouth?

Romney's #1 problem was that no one but Romney knew what Romney stood for.
 
More likely, he's looking for a spot in Gov Christies adminstration
I think that may be the case.

Except Christie has no chance in hell to become President as he is perceived as an anti-republican, so he is doing a mistake again.
 
I really don't think so, it's amazing though how likable Romney sounded when he spoke to Wolf Blitzer. Perhaps he would have faired better in the election if he spoke like that in the campaign.

Romney would have fared better if the voting public were a little brighter. The lack of education in this country is remarkable. For example, if you knew the difference between "fare" and "fair," you might have chosen the correct word.

Alas, Americans are dim and make poor decisions, and we have for president a buffoon with little relevant job experience, and whose ears stick out like a damn Mickey Mouse hat.
 
Romney would have fared better if the voting public were a little brighter. The lack of education in this country is remarkable. For example, if you knew the difference between "fare" and "fair," you might have chosen the correct word.

Alas, Americans are dim and make poor decisions, and we have for president a buffoon with little relevant job experience, and whose ears stick out like a damn Mickey Mouse hat.
No, it wouldn't. Romney did not win by much among college graduates, and if you excluded the income effect he would lose among them too.

Romney's problem was that he was not a good candidate. It's not dumb Americans fault, and it is not Tea party's fault. The fault lies in the people who were pushing a faulty candidate. Why push a candidate who is a uncharacteristic flip flopper? There were much better candidates who didn't run.

Also people want a successful entrepreneur, not a man who got rich on finance.
 
Last edited:
Apparently the voting public liked Obama more, he receive almost 5 million more votes than Romney. :thumbs:


Obama 65,899,660
Romney 60,932,152

:roll: Like that's a response.
 
Romney, no matter how you feel about him, is smart and successful even if he has a distorted personality. Millions voted for him because he had a business management career.

So, if he wants to chip in and help out in some sub-section of the government, why wouldn't that be good? I sure wasn't interested in him as President (or Obama either) but I wouldn't refuse his help.
 
Apparently the voting public liked Obama more, he receive almost 5 million more votes than Romney. :thumbs:


Obama 65,899,660
Romney 60,932,152

In some places they liked obama so much that 130% of the voters came out.
 
Perhaps you don't remember Romney accused President Obama of 'dividind America' or Running a campaign of anger. :roll:

Both true statements.
 
Apparently the voting public liked Obama more, he receive almost 5 million more votes than Romney. :thumbs:


Obama 65,899,660
Romney 60,932,152

And that suddenly makes everything that Obama says right and everything Romney said wrong? Well when you put it like that, it doesn't surprise me at all how people like you fall for his bull over and over again. :roll:
 
No, it wouldn't. Romney did not win by much among college graduates, and if you excluded the income effect he would lose among them too.

Romney's problem was that he was not a good candidate. It's not dumb Americans fault, and it is not Tea party's fault. The fault lies in the people who were pushing a faulty candidate. Why push a candidate who is a uncharacteristic flip flopper? There were much better candidates who didn't run.

Also people want a successful entrepreneur, not a man who got rich on finance.

This just in. Jobless English majors preferred Obama while successful finance graduates and MDs preferred Romney! :peace
 
Romney would have fared better if the voting public were a little brighter. The lack of education in this country is remarkable. For example, if you knew the difference between "fare" and "fair," you might have chosen the correct word.
Come on man, I entered into homophone hell.:roll:

Alas, Americans are dim and make poor decisions, and we have for president a buffoon with little relevant job experience, and whose ears stick out like a damn Mickey Mouse hat.
And then there are some that makes dumb remarks about the president. :roll:
 
Back
Top Bottom