• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

When the issue is gay marriage who are the intolerant ones?

When the issue is gay marriage who are the intolerant one?


  • Total voters
    45
Or else what? You'll go crying to the government trying to push the issue, my left wing friend? Lmao.


That is your MO......With the exception of Washington state the only states that have SSM are the 8 approved SSM and they were all blue and aprrovedd it y activist judges...
 
That is your MO......With the exception of Washington state the only states that have SSM are the 8 approved SSM and they were all blue and aprrovedd it y activist judges...

Oh yes, my big government loving, left wing friend. Removing government force is sooooooo bad. HAHAHAHAHAHAHHA


Keep pretending your "conservative" when all you want is to force people to adhere to your ideals through government. HAHAHAHAHAHA. Commies, man they love government.
 
As long as it is not recognized by the gov as such that is fine.

Fortunately you are going to be as wrong about this as you were about Mittens. Must really suck to be you. Gays getting married. Women having the right to choose. Marijuana legalized.

Poor Navy...his little intolerant world is crushing him.
 
I have lived here for 35 years my left wing friend.

You live in Everett. Don't try to pretend they are the same.

I am not your friend. I would prefer to shoot myself first.
 
You live in Everett. Don't try to pretend they are the same.

I am not your friend. I would prefer to shoot myself first.

with what-I thought you were intolerant of choice=the choice of others to be armed.
 
Oh yes, my big government loving, left wing friend. Removing government force is sooooooo bad. HAHAHAHAHAHAHHA


Keep pretending your "conservative" when all you want is to force people to adhere to your ideals through government. HAHAHAHAHAHA. Commies, man they love government.


You did not address any of my statements about SSM and big gov. and activist judges....That alughing it off when you are proven wrong is so childish,,,,,,,,,I got you big time and you know it.....
 
Oh yes, my big government loving, left wing friend. Removing government force is sooooooo bad. HAHAHAHAHAHAHHA


Keep pretending your "conservative" when all you want is to force people to adhere to your ideals through government. HAHAHAHAHAHA. Commies, man they love government.

You did not address any of my statement about Gov. and SSM. ....Laughing them off is so childish....Well enough with you when you come up with some sensible statements I will get back to you.....Good Night.
 
You did not address any of my statements about SSM and big gov. and activist judges....That alughing it off when you are proven wrong is so childish,,,,,,,,,I got you big time and you know it.....

That is a fascinating dream world you live in.
 
A minority that's oppressed by the majority, and there's a thread about which ones are intolerant? There would be no need for gay pride if the majority was tolerant.
 
You live in Everett. Don't try to pretend they are the same.

I am not your friend. I would prefer to shoot myself first.

Would you like to bet on that my left wing friend?
 
A minority that's oppressed by the majority, and there's a thread about which ones are intolerant? There would be no need for gay pride if the majority was tolerant.

I disagree, intolerance, like racism, can be demonstrated by the majority or minorities. Militant flamers like ACT UP going into St Patrick's Cathedral and doing all they could do to offend the faithful because they were mad about the Vatican's official position on gay marriage is INTOLERANCE.
 
The government isn't necessary to sanction love though. If a relationship is just for love, then marriage sanctioned by the government isn't a necessity and there for your argument for marriage if flawed and inappropriate. You can be in a committed loving relationship for years, even decades, as some people who are homosexual have shown without having the government sanction the relationship.

Legal marriage isn't about love or money, but legal kinship. Many marriages do not financially benefit both spouses. Some harm one or both financially. The only consistent thing about marriage is that it makes two people legally kin as a legal spouse. That is the only part of legal marriage that is true for every couple.
 
A minority that's oppressed by the majority, and there's a thread about which ones are intolerant? There would be no need for gay pride if the majority was tolerant.



Before you comment you need to go back and read the thread because you are out in left field.
 
As has been pointed out, the poll options are ridiculous. You can be heterosexual and support same sex marriage or be against same sex marriage. You can be homosexual and support or be against same sex marriage. There is nothing about the poll options that makes sense with the poll question.
 
I disagree, intolerance, like racism, can be demonstrated by the majority or minorities. Militant flamers like ACT UP going into St Patrick's Cathedral and doing all they could do to offend the faithful because they were mad about the Vatican's official position on gay marriage is INTOLERANCE.
I've heard that the KKK is quite egalitarian though :D , I'm not always very critical with my thinking, thanks for dragging my ignorance out of the bar and shooting it.
 
I've heard that the KKK is quite egalitarian though :D , I'm not always very critical with my thinking, thanks for dragging my ignorance out of the bar and shooting it.

The problem (one of many) with the KKK is they pretend they are the "master race" but they tend to be the dregs of the white folks. Racial supremacists are almost always the bottom of the barrel of their own ethnic group
 
The problem (one of many) with the KKK is they pretend they are the "master race" but they tend to be the dregs of the white folks. Racial supremacists are almost always the bottom of the barrel of their own ethnic group

And their dental plan suxs!
 
The problem (one of many) with the KKK is they pretend they are the "master race" but they tend to be the dregs of the white folks. Racial supremacists are almost always the bottom of the barrel of their own ethnic group

I think that's why they are what they are--all they have going for them is the color of their skin. Sad, really.
 
Back
Top Bottom