• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

When the issue is gay marriage who are the intolerant ones?

When the issue is gay marriage who are the intolerant one?

  • Total voters
    45
disneydude said:
Are you ok with putting your marriage up to a popular vote Navy? Let the states decide for themselves?
Click to expand...

No! If you try to use the government to interfere with NP's marriage, you're a big government supporter and have no idea what this country is founded on and get out. But if he wants to use government to interfere with other people getting married; well that's just fine. Quit going against the will of the People.
 
Navy Pride said:
I want the people to vote. just like they did in Calfornia..........You don't you know you can not win if activist judges get involved.
Click to expand...

So NP, let me ask you this: Was the Supreme Court correct or incorrect in Loving v. Virginia. Did you support that decision? Or do you believe that the Supreme Court should not have stepped in and should have allowed each state to define marriage according to their own dictates and put it to a vote?
 
Ikari said:
"Reeducation Camp"
Click to expand...

Gezzzz, can't send people there. That's cruel and unusual punishment. It's like sending somebody to Boy Scout Camp...full of gay people who are disclosing their gayness, which isn't actually gayness, per se, but pedophilia - disguised as gayness.

Second thought...NP would love liberals to be tortured or maybe their sexual orientation be messed with...so why not "Reeducation Camp"...

Yeah...that's the ticket.
 
Ikari said:
No, my left wing friend, it's because you couldn't even identify the proper structure of the United States. Though I do find your statement here ironic given your past posts on this subject. So at least you're worth some laughs, commie.
Click to expand...

So we are a republic but we don't have a democratic process in this country....Got it.....:lamo
 
Navy Pride said:
So we are a republic but we don't have a democratic process in this country....Got it.....:lamo
Click to expand...

Indeed, a democratic Republic is not a strict democracy. The desires and wants of the majority are tempered by the rights and liberties of the minority. That's how a Republic works, my left wing friend.
 
disneydude said:
Are you ok with putting your marriage up to a popular vote Navy? Let the states decide for themselves?
Click to expand...

No because under the law mine is legal......41 states have said SSM is not legal.
 
Ikari said:
Indeed, a democratic Republic is not a strict democracy. The desires and wants of the majority are tempered by the rights and liberties of the minority. That's how a Republic works, my left wing friend.
Click to expand...

Your argument is sounding is starting to sound very ridiculous so I will let you go.
 
Smeagol said:
Some of both, to be honest. The much of political correctness culture IMHO is designed to socially stigmatize and in some cases punish people of faith for believing the Bible.
Click to expand...

I could care less if people want to worship a book of fairy tales. The minute however you assume that others should adhere to the back ass thinking in the bible, I have a serious problem with it.

That single concept is seemingly impossible for most of those on the right to grasp.
 
Navy Pride said:

Your argument is sounding is starting to sound very ridiculous so I will let you go.
Click to expand...

Why if that ain't the pot calling the kettle black, my left wing friend.
 
disneydude said:
So NP, let me ask you this: Was the Supreme Court correct or incorrect in Loving v. Virginia. Did you support that decision? Or do you believe that the Supreme Court should not have stepped in and should have allowed each state to define marriage according to their own dictates and put it to a vote?
Click to expand...

Yes that was between a man and a woman and I applauded it did you........Your point is?:confused:
 
Navy Pride said:
If you don't know my left wing friend maybe you should keep quiet.......I live here for the last 36 years I know what is going on you don't.
Click to expand...

I have lived all over this country for the past 50 years. So I can honestly say you really don't know anything about this. If you are basing it on anecdotal evidence from one area of the Pacific Northwest, then you are even more mistaken. Basically you are guilty of the same bigotry you are accusing others of.

Navy Pride said:
Question for you my left wing friend . Why do you list yourself as a Conservative when you are clearly a bleedig heart liberal?
Click to expand...

Well if we were all judged on one issue, you would be a fascist.

#1 You are not my friend.
#2 I am more to the right than you are.
#3 I think that equal protection under the law in this country and our Constitution is more important than partisan crap.

Now, think about that for awhile.
 
Wiggen said:
What exactly did God say and who heard him say it? Was it the same speech where he said he wanted adulterers stoned and where he said slaves should obey their masters? Or where women should submit to men?
Click to expand...

You mean when Aaron said he wanted adulterers stoned and Timothy said where slaves should obey their masters? God didn't give Aaron authority to speak for Him. God gave Moses Authority to speak for Him, and Moses delegated that authority to Aaron even after Moses asked God if he wanted Aaron instead, and God told Moses that God chose Moses, not Aaron. God punished Aaron for making up his own rules and pretending they came from God. God never gave Timothy any authority to speak for Him, either. God 's son Jesus gave authority to Paul to speak for Jesus, and Paul delegated that authority to Timothy without Jesus' express permission. You mean when God said that wives should submit to their husbands and husbands should treat their wives the same way they treat themselves? God never said all women should submit to all men. That would be being a foolish whore, and God told women not to be foolish and not to be whores.
 
Navy Pride said:
No because under the law mine is legal......41 states have said SSM is not legal.
Click to expand...

I can't help but notice you have managed to ignore the last couple responses I have to you. Your views on this are not in line with the church, nor are they in line with conservative values. You are trying to manipulate these institutions for your own twisted needs. It is sick.
 
Dapper Andy said:
Different tax rates for different people is fictitious?

I'm sorry. It took me longer than usual to realize you're just trolling. I'll happily ignore you now.
Click to expand...

I'm happy that you're happy. And I'm happy that you validated my characterization of your examples as fiction by suddenly "forgetting" every example you put forth, except that different people have different tax rates. I'm rather disappointed in you for calling my honesty "Trolling", it took the honesty out of your admission that I'm right.
 
Navy Pride said:
No because under the law mine is legal......41 states have said SSM is not legal.
Click to expand...

LOL....thought so. You are such a hypocrite Navy. Its fine to vote on some people's marriages but not others. Of course...why would I expect more from someone like you. You are lucky that Loving changed the definition of your marriage in the 40 or so states that didn't allow inter-racial marriage until that definition changed.
 
Navy Pride said:
Yes that was between a man and a woman and I applauded it did you........Your point is?:confused:
Click to expand...

So you support "Activist" courts changing the definition of marriage that existed for decades, despite the fact that many found those marriages disgusting and perverted....when YOU benefit....but deny others the same right. That is the CLASSIC definition of bigotry.
 
Top Cat said:
I could care less if people want to worship a book of fairy tales. The minute however you assume that others should adhere to the back ass thinking in the bible, I have a serious problem with it.

That single concept is seemingly impossible for most of those on the right to grasp.
Click to expand...

Funny... for someone who believes in equality, you sure are awful supportive of shutting the right up because of their opinions. So much for political equality and freedom of speech...:coffeepap
 
disneydude said:
So you support "Activist" courts changing the definition of marriage that existed for decades, despite the fact that many found those marriages disgusting and perverted....when YOU benefit....but deny others the same right. That is the CLASSIC definition of bigotry.
Click to expand...

Sure if its between a man and a woman. Should have never been blocked in the first place. Now SSM is a whole different issue.
 
disneydude said:
LOL....thought so. You are such a hypocrite Navy. Its fine to vote on some people's marriages but not others. Of course...why would I expect more from someone like you. You are lucky that Loving changed the definition of your marriage in the 40 or so states that didn't allow inter-racial marriage until that definition changed.
Click to expand...

He's a big government leftist. Of course he wants government telling people their personal business. He's one of those "it takes a village" folks.
 
Black Manta said:
I have lived all over this country for the past 50 years. So I can honestly say you really don't know anything about this. If you are basing it on anecdotal evidence from one area of the Pacific Northwest, then you are even more mistaken. Basically you are guilty of the same bigotry you are accusing others of.





Well if we were all judged on one issue, you would be a fascist.

#1 You are not my friend.
#2 I am more to the right than you are.
#3 I think that equal protection under the law in this country and our Constitution is more important than partisan crap.

Now, think about that for awhile.
Click to expand...

Yes but we were talking about the Seattle.........I too have lived all over the USA and that info is not pertinent.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom