Here, from your own link ....
The information about Iraq's desire to acquire the ore, known as yellowcake, was used by the Bush administration to help justify the invasion of Iraq, notably by President Bush in his State of the Union address in January 2003. But the information was later revealed to have been based on forgeries.
... and then there's this ...
The documents were the basis for sending a former diplomat, Joseph C. Wilson IV, on a fact-finding mission to Niger that eventually exploded into an inquiry that led to the indictment and resignation last week of Vice President Dick Cheney's chief of staff, I. Lewis Libby.
But you also claimed the original reporting by the CIA was based on reports of the documents and not the actual documents themselves, and that appears to be correct. However your assessment that they were immediately exposed as forgeries remains in error. It wasn't until the IAEA examined them some 6 months later that they were exposed as forgeries.
Nope. not wrong.
Condoleezza Rice, a senior aide of hers, the Director of the CIA, and the White House ALL said the 16 words should not have been in the speech and yes, they had removed it from a speech earlier; for the same reason it shouldn't have been in the SofU address.