There are many ways force can be exerted and surely as a parent, you know that they are not all physical. You must present your kids with unpalatable choices to get them to do what you want and therefore know what a valuable tool that kind of force is. This choice is more than unpalatable and the results are physically permanent, which is something a parent would be arrested for doing to their kids. Does that clarify how it is force? Or am I assuming too much?
A policy of fertility for food is very punitive. It's not up to you or the government to decide who is better off with more children or not. As a libertarian, that you are arguing for government to perform forced surgical procedures in exchange for benefits, is very surprising.
My statement was accurate. Forced surgical procedures are egregious, while your descriptions, as noted, are the very definition of hyperbole, having added zero to your argument except to highlight your exaggerated sense of anger.
Which equates to warehousing the welfare recipients into ghettos, chris. They all live there, away from us and are thus stigmatized. I cannot think of a more defeating situation and damaging to the children.
And again, this will not save the government money. There would need to be staff, to record people going in and out. Maintenance of buildings and grounds. If you are planning on feeding them in cafeterias, then cooks and dishwashers. If you are planning on handing out food, people are needed to manage the inventory. It would be necessary to have social workers on site as well, to manage cases.