Due to the anatomical differences between males and females, sexual activity for young girls engaging in said activies for the first time involves some level of physical injury and pain. This however is not the case for males.
A lot of that just isn't true anymore. Girls in their teens are as likely to be sexually "aggressive" (interesting word choice that) as boys.
Girls may get pregnant yes... but THEY choose whether to abort or keep, and THEY choose whether to hold the male financially accountable for the next 18 years, so I think that kinda balances out.
Both boys and girls may get STDs, so no diff there.
Both boys and girls can be emotionally abused by more mature sex partners, so no diff there.
I think this is just left-over gender bias.... I thought we supposedly had this equality-of-the-sexes thing going on now right?
I'm not of the understanding that abortion is a 'no big deal' procedure. It's on par with outpatient surgery. Secondly, in many cases it leaves the lady with years if not a lifetime of emotional pain. It sometimes leaves the lady sterile.
Yes, both males and females can and do contract stds but in some cases even if the std is present, males are less likely to be infected as females due simply to anatomical differences. For example, there is a push right now in Africa for all males to become circumcised because it lowers their risk of contracting various sexually communicable infections including HIV. The reason for this is anatomically, areas of the body that can trap bacteria/virus in a warm and moist environment are more likely to be an incubator for microbes to infect to body. Agreeably both males are females are at risk but with females there's no comparison.
I'm all for progress and equal opportunity but saying we as a society should disregard all special defenses of ladies due to their unique vulnerabilities is in my humble opinion calloused and extreme.
What makes people upset is when she attributes things to them which they never said and uses dishonesty in her arguments. That is NOT a "cultural difference."
Oh, I didn't know Medusa was not in the US. But I don't think that tainted my posts on the issue. In the Netherlands the age of consent for sex is 16, I believe.
should a man age of 21 be charged with pedohilia and convicted of having sex with a child age of 14 15 0r 16 ?
when should a person be considered adult ?
my purpose in starting this thread is not to justify this action
l just wonder why a person has to be accused of being a pedohilie although he is not sexually interested in little children
many of the teenagers have the physical maturity to have sex and give birth although not all of them can be emotionally mature to marry and raise their babies.
if 3 or more adults over 18 can have sex together or marry if polygamy is legalized , why is a person considered pervert pedohilie only because he had sex with a girl who is mature enough to menstruate ?
if both of them are consent to have sex ,what is teh problem ?
they dont seem more disturbing than polygamic lovers
I agree but I think that 18 across the board for sexual consent and marital consent is old enough. They have had an opportunity to finish high school by then at least.
Because of the fact that the are going to be sexually active younger than 25 and perhaps have a resultant pregnancy, they should be allowed to marry IMO. But I would use 18 as the age because of educational purposes, as well as the maturity factor.
Well let me ask you this - how many people your age do you know who married at 17/18 that are still together? My guess is probably very few, if any - unless she got knocked up.
It was common in my grandparents' days because back then, divorce was taboo and frowned upon so you stuck with the person you married, come hell or high water, even if they turned out to be a complete waste of oxygen.
You CAN get married at 18, just like you CAN get divorced at 20. Then you're on the market as 20 and divorced. Good luck finding someone new, especially if you got a kid out of that brief mistake.
LOL - I saw this in Medusa's siggy . . . had to quote!
Because I was married at 17 - divorced at 20 . . . and had 2 kids with him . . . and you're hot for me, too - so apparently all that **** doesn't matter, really - does it?
It's all in the tits.
And i Just ruined your point - sorry bout that. OR proved the first point . . . whichever - whatever.
LOL!
...and then I'd sneak out when you're asleep.
:rofl
Oh Gipper - on the ****tiest of all my days you're the one to make me finally laugh. Thanks.
If you cant drink - you cant die in our Army