• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

polygamy ? [W: 267,434]

must polygamy be legalized ?

  • it is better than monogamy

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    68
l see .but they dont marry,they just have sex .no man over 18 must be convicted because he had sex with a 17 years old girl

she seems mature enough to have sex with everybody

am l wrong *

arent they?*

WHAT is your point? Yes, 17 is a legal of age of consent in many states for sex AND marriage. So WHAT is your point?
 
WHAT is your point? Yes, 17 is a legal of age of consent in many states for sex AND marriage. So WHAT is your point?

it is still not legal in many of them..

,if you still dont want to see my point ,l cant do anything else...........
 
yes ,laws can change as in polygamy..thats what l mean..

NO they can't. The laws about age of consent do NOT need to be changed. Again, for the UMPTEENTH time, no one is talking about marrying CHILDREN who are not of legal age.

We are talking about ADULTS making an informed decision about the type of relationship that they want to have with another which is really none of your business.
 
You're doing no such thing, seeing as everyone was talking about consent between A D U L T S. You're the one who started bringing underage kids into the equation. Why did you do that?

kids mustnt have sex...........

they dont seem to be kid
 
it is still not legal in many of them..

,if you still dont want to see my point ,l cant do anything else...........

You aren't making any points. That's the problem. You keep repeating about age of consent, when NOBODY suggested lowering it. I like you as a person and I'm sorry, but you're argument is completely ridiculous and NOT convincing.
 
NO they can't. The laws about age of consent do NOT need to be changed. Again, for the UMPTEENTH time, no one is talking about marrying CHILDREN who are not of legal age.

We are talking about ADULTS making an informed decision about the type of relationship that they want to have with another which is really none of your business.

so dont try to change it for polygamy either,

WHAT is your point? Yes, 17 is a legal of age of consent in many states for sex AND marriage. So WHAT is your point?

this is your post..


what is the fault of those people who dont live in those states ?

why dont you want it to be applied in every state ?

many girls over 18 are consent to have sex with men over 18
who are you to prevent them from having sex with them ?

according to your consent logic .))
 
it is still not legal in many of them..

,if you still dont want to see my point ,l cant do anything else...........

What's not legal in many of what? You have to be a bit more precise in your responses.

I will assume that you are saying that 17 years old is not the age of consent in all states. While that is true, that does absolutely NOTHING to advance your argument because you wouldn't have to worry about it then. They CANNOT marry if they are not at age of consent.
 
l see .but they dont marry,they just have sex .no man over 18 must be convicted because he had sex with a 17 years old girl

she seems mature enough to have sex with everybody

am l wrong *

arent they?*

Well, if you're asking me personally, I think that once we deem someone old enough to have sex, this person should be allowed to have sex with anyone they want to. Placing further limitations on it sort of defeats the purpose. Either they're mature enough for sex or they're not. :shrug:

But this still has nothing to do with the marriage laws we're supposed to be discussing here.
 
so dont try to change it for polygamy either,

WHAT is your point? Yes, 17 is a legal of age of consent in many states for sex AND marriage. So WHAT is your point?

this is your post..


what is the fault of those people who dont live in those states ?

why dont you want it to be applied in every state ?

Again, this has NOTHING to do with your OP topic. :roll: Good God! The only person talking about age of consent and pedophilia is YOU.

Um, NO, and now YOU are being dishonest.
 
You aren't making any points. That's the problem. You keep repeating about age of consent, when NOBODY suggested lowering it. I like you as a person and I'm sorry, but you're argument is completely ridiculous and NOT convincing.

consent is your own arguments

not mine.......
 
Again, this has NOTHING to do with your OP topic. :roll: Good God! The only person talking about age of consent and pedophilia is YOU.

Um, NO, and now YOU are being dishonest.

why ?

because l dont want any man over 18 to be convicted from pedophilia because he had sex with a girl age of 17

is it honest ??,

do you think she was not consent??
 
consent is your own arguments

not mine.......

I have absolutely NO idea what you are talking about. My argument has NOTHING to do with what you are talking about.

Your original OP was about polygamy and NOT about age of consent. You are the one who won't stop talking about children. The rest of us are talking about adults.
 
why ?

because l dont want any man over 18 to be convicted from pedophilia because he had sex with a girl age of 17

is it honest ??,

do you think she was not consent??

If you are going to LIE about me and attribute quotes to me dishonestly, then I want nothing further to do with you. THAT is a disgusting way to debate, intellectually dishonest and says a LOT about the kind of person you are.
 
I have absolutely NO idea what you are talking about. My argument has NOTHING to do with what you are talking about.

Your original OP was about polygamy and NOT about age of consent. You are the one who won't stop talking about children. The rest of us are talking about adults.

children mustnt be allowed to have sex '!!!

17 years old girl is not a child......................

many of you have repeated that if those people are consent to marry each other ,there is no problem

and now you claim nobody is talking about consent!!,
,
come onnnnnnnn
 
If you are going to LIE about me and attribute quotes to me dishonestly, then I want nothing further to do with you. THAT is a disgusting way to debate, intellectually dishonest and says a LOT about the kind of person you are.

you always seem agressive..
 
What's not legal in many of what? You have to be a bit more precise in your responses.

I will assume that you are saying that 17 years old is not the age of consent in all states. While that is true, that does absolutely NOTHING to advance your argument because you wouldn't have to worry about it then. They CANNOT marry if they are not at age of consent.
but they can marry while 17 in some states

dont pretend to misunderstand me.

why dont you want to change the laws so that other 17 years old girls can marry *

la m not talking about marriage

but they are convicted from pedohilia although they are not pedohilie

if 4 or 5 perverts can have group sex and marry legally

you have no right to prevent two people from havign sex with each other
 
but they can marry while 17 in some states

dont pretend to misunderstand me.

why dont you want to change the laws so that other 17 years old girls can marry *

la m not talking about marriage

but they are convicted from pedohilia although they are not pedohilie

if 4 or 5 perverts can have group sex and marry legally

you have no right to prevent two people from havign sex with each other

That is just dense as hell. States set their own consent laws. Perhaps you should know a little bit about what you are arguing before you start an argument? Hmmm?
 
Back
Top Bottom