• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

polygamy ? [W: 267,434]

must polygamy be legalized ?

  • it is better than monogamy

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    68
it has something to do with being consent..........................

Why is it any different for a 16-year-old (IF that is the age of consent) marrying one person as opposed to two people or several people? What is the difference? They are going to be having sex whether they are married to one, two or three people.

So YOUR problem is with age of consent then, not polygamy.
 
old men cant marry with little girls here too!! we are not arabia!!

Well then I don't understand why you are so frightened of polygamy.
 
So then you should have started a thread that said "I think 16 years old is too young to marry anybody."
 
Why is it any different for a 16-year-old (IF that is the age of consent) marrying one person as opposed to two people or several people? What is the difference? They are going to be having sex whether they are married to one, two or three people.

So YOUR problem is with age of consent then, not polygamy.

why is a person who is 20 convicted from pedohilia because he had sex with a girl 17 ?

do you think it is normal ?
 
I keep asking Medusa if she's really comparing pedophilia to polygamy, and she keeps not answering. Maybe she is focusing on adults marrying kids because she like young boys.
 
Well then I don't understand why you are so frightened of polygamy.


we dont have abortion discussions here .dont worry,we are more secular..

l have been trying to explain why l dislike it....................
 
I keep asking Medusa if she's really comparing pedophilia to polygamy, and she keeps not answering. Maybe she is focusing on adults marrying kids because she like young boys.

consent *

dont lie!!!

if the problem is being consent ,who are you to prevent it ?

l am young enough!! l dont need to like younger ones!!
 
My interesting logic? That was my first post in this thread. Do try to keep up.

It's illegal for adults to have sex with children because children are legally UNABLE to consent.

Again -- Are you suggesting that poly relationships and poly marriages are comparable to pedophilia?

,dont be funny ,change the laws as you want to change it for polygamy
they seem to be consent enough to have sex with everybody and give birth !!
 
consent *

dont lie!!!

if the problem is being consent ,who are you to prevent it ?

I'll ask you one more time -- are you comparing polygamy to pedophilia, yes or no?

l am young enough!! l dont need to like younger ones!!

Could have fooled me, with how you'e been obsessing over pedophilia.
 
we dont have abortion discussions here .dont worry,we are more secular..

l have been trying to explain why l dislike it....................

All I can say is WOW! This is an exercise in futility apparently.
 
I'll ask you one more time -- are you comparing polygamy to pedophilia, yes or no?



Could have fooled me, with how you'e been obsessing over pedophilia.

yes ,if teh problem is being consent .........

according yo your marginal logics

dont worry about legality

a child (! ) must have the right to have sex with a person over 18 ( 20 ,22 )

they must have teh same freedom as polygamic adults!!
 
,dont be funny ,change the laws as you want to change it for polygamy
they seem to be consent enough to have sex with everybody and give birth !!

Medusa, for the umpteenth time, the polygamy laws are about marriage. Marriage is between legal, consenting *ADULTS*. Nobody wants to change the age of consent laws which usually involve minors. The sexual age of consent laws are not the same as the legal majority age laws.
 
You keep mistaking me for someone else. Apparently you are easily confused. No wonder you are comparing pedophilia and polygamy.[/QUOTE]

l am being honest

if 4 perverts have the right to marry each other , a man 20 years of age cant be convicted from pedohilia because he had
sex with a 17 years old girl .l am clear enough!!


according to you
 
yes ,if teh problem is being consent .........

according yo your marginal logics

dont worry about legality

a child (! ) must have the right to have sex with a person over 18 ( 20 ,22 )

they must have teh same freedom as polygamic adults!!

You're going off on a tangent. Maybe it's because you really don't have much of an argument? I don't know, but you are going WAY off your own topic. You should stop and reconsider your argument here because it makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.
 
TacticalEvilDan;10614484[B said:
88]Keep lying about[/B] what you said. Lying seems to be what you do best -- that and comparisons that make no sense.

:shock:

can you show where i lied ?
 
You're going off on a tangent. Maybe it's because you really don't have much of an argument? I don't know, but you are going WAY off your own topic. You should stop and reconsider your argument here because it makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.

no ,l am just hittin many of you with your own " consent" arguments
 

l am being honest

if 4 perverts have the right to marry each other , a man 20 years of age cant be convicted from pedohilia because he had
sex with a 17 years old girl .l am clear enough!!


according to you

NO!!! It still makes absolutely NO SENSE!
 

l am being honest

if 4 perverts have the right to marry each other , a man 20 years of age cant be convicted from pedohilia because he had
sex with a 17 years old girl .l am clear enough!!


according to you

No, you are lying your face off. First of all, the person you had the consent debate with was ArcanaXV, not me.

Second, ArcanaXV made it very clear she was talking about the right of adults to consent, not underage kids.

Please stop lying about what other people say.
 
no ,l am just hittin many of you with your own " consent" arguments

No you're not, your argument makes absolutely no sense.
 
You keep mistaking me for someone else. Apparently you are easily confused. No wonder you are comparing pedophilia and polygamy.[/QUOTE]

l am being honest

if 4 perverts have the right to marry each other , a man 20 years of age cant be convicted from pedohilia because he had
sex with a 17 years old girl .l am clear enough!!


according to you

It depends on the age of consent laws. In many countries the 20 year old man would have done nothing wrong.
 
Medusa, for the umpteenth time, the polygamy laws are about marriage. Marriage is between legal, consenting *ADULTS*. Nobody wants to change the age of consent laws which usually involve minors. The sexual age of consent laws are not the same as the legal majority age laws.

l see .but they dont marry,they just have sex .no man over 18 must be convicted because he had sex with a 17 years old girl

she seems mature enough to have sex with everybody

am l wrong *

arent they?*
 
Back
Top Bottom