There is a good chance he is running in 2016. Would you vote for him?
Ah..no. Richard Carmona is a democrat.
Reading comprehension, gotta love it, first I said TURNING not ARE, second I named three states.
I said if the Kings leave another takes it's place, like the Colts leaving Baltimore in the dead of night it was replaced by a team that did something of note this year... what was it?
Be interesting to see who pays off the loan the kings took out when they strong-armed the City into giving to keep them in Sac.
Kentucky will feel the same way next time.
And Rove is doing Dems big favors trying to trash Judd right now.
And it is total nonsense to claim everyone leaving is 'fleeing'. :roll:
Our nation is one of the most mobile bunch to ever carry the same color passport. one thing I can say about Northern Cali republicans are for all they bitch whine and moan about 'liberals' they are FAR more liberal in many social areas- recycling, pollution, even firearm control than the democrats here in Oklahoma.
Hear me now and believe me later, political parties are not uniform across the nation.
Anyone who thinks that they are doesn't know much about the USA.
Ah..no. Richard Carmona is a democrat.
But Flake won.
Can you name a state that is turning Liberal? Arizona voted for the Romney for president and I believe has 2 Republican senators.
The Kings are a done deal they are moving to Seattle....a non refundable 30 ,illion dollars has been passed to the Owners...Do you really think that anyone would pay that kind of money without it being a done deal? If you do I have some waterfront property I would love to sell you in Arizona.
Colorado, New Mexico, Nevada - all converted. Arizona's next.
Colorado, New Mexico, Nevada - all converted. Arizona's next.
Colorado, New Mexico, Nevada - all converted. Arizona's next.
There is a good chance he is running in 2016. Would you vote for him?
Yes, we call that a weak argument. You might want to learn some things about property rights before you just go on and on about the status quo being right. Just sayin'
Here I have some homework for you:
Tell why people wanted property protected in the first place. Hell even tell me how it worked in nature if you want and then be sure to tell why that is not the condition we wanted to follow in society. Hell why don't you tell me about how Indians actually owned certain things and how those items were not shared with the general population unless they wished it.
Or you could just admit its a violation of the very foundation of property.
There is a good chance he is running in 2016. Would you vote for him?
Colorado, New Mexico, Nevada - all converted. Arizona's next.
The more basic lesson is to notice which side holds the most force. The government has declared you do not have a right to do so, and enforces it regularly. Any pitiful response you deliver back to the argument is met with indifference. Without might, you are wrong, or perhaps merely the victim of unfortunate circumstance.
So no argument from you either then? Good to know. Next time don't bother responding to me if all you have is "you can't do anything about it" nonsense.
He is unelectable so he should not be nominated.
I think you are right. I know Judd was thinking about running, I haven't heard that she will or not. Can you add anything more?
No. Saying he wouldn't vote for the civil rights bills of 1965 were they offered today, is enough for me. Though there are certainly more reasons.
All I have done is shown that you do not have a right to discriminate. Government declaration met with government force and societal toleration means whatever incredibly silly comment you have is utterly meaningless.