• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Would you vote for Rand Paul for president?

Would you vote for Rand Paul for president?

  • Yes

    Votes: 33 37.1%

  • No

    Votes: 56 62.9%
  • Total voters
    89
Navy Pride said:
What is SOTU?:confused:
Click to expand...

State Of The Union address.

I can't think of more than maybe two or three people I would be less likely to vote for. Michelle Bachmann maybe.
 
Navy Pride said:
I really don't know what the hell you are talking about



Go to the corrected link that I posted @ # 46, do a little research and you'll see why I'll never support this dude. If you want to vote for him, get after it.

The only way that Rand Paul will ever see the inside of the White House is as a guest. He is outside of the mainstream. Way outside.

Deal with it.
Click to expand...
 
Unitedwestand13 said:
Personally I think rand Paul does not have the practical decision making required for govenor. I think Hilliary should not run in 2016 let Andrew cumuo have a chance, or maybe Brian Schweitzer if he considers running.
Click to expand...

This from someone who has Brown for a Governor :lamo
 


You need to round up some support for your boy Paul, your poll shows him losing by more than 3-1.
 
Navy Pride said:
Your right but people are fleeing it by the thousands...Your even going to lose your NBA team the Kingss....
Click to expand...

Those 'fleeing' California are turning neighboring states liberal. For every ranting millionaire golfer there are dozens of very liberal 'refugees'. THAT might be the best plan those sneaky dems have going. The neighboring states are very population lite and a few thousand Cali hippies can easily sway states like New Mexico, Colorado, and even Arizona far more liberal, creating a SW stronghold to balance the Population heavy NE stronghold. Imagine a block of Governors in the SW who are dem with state houses and national senators who are dems too.

If a team leaves another is ready to take there place, but I'll bet ya a shiny nickle just like Mickelson, the Kings stay.
 
shrubnose said:
His position on the issues is why I'll never vote for that dude.

Before the 2010 election Rand Paul said that if he had been in the U.S. Congress back when the 1964 Civil Rights Act was being debated he would have opposed parts of it.

Read about it: Rand Paul: Civil Rights Act brouhaha clouds Senate campaign - CSMonitor.com
Click to expand...

Yup, if I recall he made a point that many libertarians will make about the civil rights law of 1964, in that it violates property owners right to control access to their property. Guess what? It does. People have the right to say no to certain people based on whatever they decide, be it race, sexually, gender, or some random stupid crap like that dude is ugly. The point is it can be whatever and saying you can't do that is violating the basic foundation of property. It seems to me your problem is not with Paul saying this, but with the fact itself.
 
Last edited:
notquiteright said:
Those 'fleeing' California are turning neighboring states liberal. For every ranting millionaire golfer there are dozens of very liberal 'refugees'. THAT might be the best plan those sneaky dems have going. The neighboring states are very population lite and a few thousand Cali hippies can easily sway states like New Mexico, Colorado, and even Arizona far more liberal, creating a SW stronghold to balance the Population heavy NE stronghold. Imagine a block of Governors in the SW who are dem with state houses and national senators who are dems too.

If a team leaves another is ready to take there place, but I'll bet ya a shiny nickle just like Mickelson, the Kings stay.
Click to expand...

Can you name a state that is turning Liberal? Arizona voted for the Romney for president and I believe has 2 Republican senators.


The Kings are a done deal they are moving to Seattle....a non refundable 30 ,illion dollars has been passed to the Owners...Do you really think that anyone would pay that kind of money without it being a done deal? If you do I have some waterfront property I would love to sell you in Arizona.
 
notquiteright said:
Those 'fleeing' California are turning neighboring states liberal. For every ranting millionaire golfer there are dozens of very liberal 'refugees'. THAT might be the best plan those sneaky dems have going. The neighboring states are very population lite and a few thousand Cali hippies can easily sway states like New Mexico, Colorado, and even Arizona far more liberal, creating a SW stronghold to balance the Population heavy NE stronghold. Imagine a block of Governors in the SW who are dem with state houses and national senators who are dems too.

If a team leaves another is ready to take there place, but I'll bet ya a shiny nickle just like Mickelson, the Kings stay.
Click to expand...

There is so much nonsense in this post. Do you honestly think the people fleeing a liberal stronghold because of issues created by liberal policy are people like yourself?
 
Henrin said:
People have the right to say no to certain people based on whatever they decide, be it race, sexually, gender, or some random stupid crap like that dude is ugly. .
Click to expand...


Not in the USA they don't.

Try telling some Black people that you don't want them in your restaurant and see what happens.

Seriously, try it.
 
shrubnose said:
You need to round up some support for your boy Paul, your poll shows him losing by more than 3-1.
Click to expand...

As a famous actor once said and I paraphrase: "Are you talking to me."
 
shrubnose said:
Not in the USA they don't.

Try telling some Black people that you don't want them in your restaurant and see what happens.
Click to expand...

Yes, we call that a weak argument. You might want to learn some things about property rights before you just go on and on about the status quo being right. Just sayin'

Here I have some homework for you:

Tell why people wanted property protected in the first place. Hell even tell me how it worked in nature if you want and then be sure to tell why that is not the condition we wanted to follow in society. Hell why don't you tell me about how Indians actually owned certain things and how those items were not shared with the general population unless they wished it.

Or you could just admit its a violation of the very foundation of property.
 
Last edited:
shrubnose said:
Not in the USA they don't.

Try telling some Black people that you don't want them in your restaurant and see what happens.
Click to expand...

Totally different situation...........A restuarant is a business that caters to the public..........Of course they have to serve them.
 
Navy Pride said:
Can you name a state that is turning Liberal? Arizona voted for the Romney for president and I believe has 2 Republican senators.


The Kings are a done deal they are moving to Seattle....a non refundable 30 ,illion dollars has been passed to the Owners...Do you really think that anyone would pay that kind of money without it being a done deal? If you do I have some waterfront property I would love to sell you in Arizona.
Click to expand...

I recall that Jeff flake won against Richard carmona by only a few points
 
Navy Pride said:
Totally different situation...........A restuarant is a business that caters to the public..........Of course they have to serve them.
Click to expand...

Makes no difference at all. It is private property owned by private citizens. The property rights are the same. Let's also remember they exist to serve themselves first and other people second like anyone else.
 
Navy Pride said:
Can you name a state that is turning Liberal? Arizona voted for the Romney for president and I believe has 2 Republican senators.


The Kings are a done deal they are moving to Seattle....a non refundable 30 ,illion dollars has been passed to the Owners...Do you really think that anyone would pay that kind of money without it being a done deal? If you do I have some waterfront property I would love to sell you in Arizona.
Click to expand...

Reading comprehension, gotta love it, first I said TURNING not ARE, second I named three states.

I said if the Kings leave another takes it's place, like the Colts leaving Baltimore in the dead of night it was replaced by a team that did something of note this year... what was it?

Be interesting to see who pays off the loan the kings took out when they strong-armed the City into giving to keep them in Sac.
 
Henrin said:
Here I have some homework for you:
Click to expand...


Rand Paul had the same argument, didn't work out for him so he changed his tune.

I am waiting for you to tell me how telling those Black people they couldn't eat in your restaurant turned out.


"Better days are coming." ~ But not for today's out of touch, running out of time, GOP.
 
shrubnose said:
Rand Paul had the same argument, didn't work out for him so he changed his tune.

I am waiting for you to tell me how telling those Black people they couldn't eat in your restaurant turned out.
Click to expand...

It doesn't matter. Its a completely unimportant fact.
 
He is my ideal candidate, at this time.
 
Henrin said:
There is so much nonsense in this post. Do you honestly think the people fleeing a liberal stronghold because of issues created by liberal policy are people like yourself?
Click to expand...

And it is total nonsense to claim everyone leaving is 'fleeing'. :roll:

Our nation is one of the most mobile bunch to ever carry the same color passport. one thing I can say about Northern Cali republicans are for all they bitch whine and moan about 'liberals' they are FAR more liberal in many social areas- recycling, pollution, even firearm control than the democrats here in Oklahoma.

Hear me now and believe me later, political parties are not uniform across the nation.
 
Kentucky will feel the same way next time.
And Rove is doing Dems big favors trying to trash Judd right now.

Redress said:
State Of The Union address.

I can't think of more than maybe two or three people I would be less likely to vote for. Michelle Bachmann maybe.
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom