• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Would you allow your son to go to a camp with heterosexual leaders and members?

Would you allow your son to go to a camp with heterosexual leaders and members?


  • Total voters
    21

ThePlayDrive

DP Veteran
Joined
Mar 3, 2011
Messages
19,610
Reaction score
7,647
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
According to a study from 1993 by Dr. Carole Jenny, in 82% of sexual abuse cases studied during her research, the alleged offender was a heterosexual partner of a close relative of the child. Here is a quote from the abstract:

Abuse was ruled out in 35 cases. Seventy-four children were allegedly abused by other children and teenagers less than 18 years old. In 9 cases, an offender could not be identified. In the remaining 269 cases, two offenders were identified as being gay or lesbian. In 82% of cases (222/269), the alleged offender was a heterosexual partner of a close relative of the child.

Another study, from 1975, by Dr. Nicholas Groth studied a random group of 175 males convicted of sexual assault against children[FONT=arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif]. [/FONT]The study showed the following:

All regressed offenders, whether their victims were male or female children, were heterosexual in their adult orientation. There were no examples of regression to child victims among peer-oriented, homosexual males. The possibility emerges that homosexuality and homosexual pedophilia may be mutually exclusive and that the adult heterosexual male constitutes a greater risk to the underage child than does the adult homosexual male.

With that in mind, it may be more safe for our sons if we remove all heterosexual males from camps and groups like the Boy Scouts and fill them with flaming homosexuals since the former appear to be exceedingly more likely to sexually abuse young children. Do you agree? Would you send your son to camp with heterosexual men given these alarming statistics?
 
Last edited:
I would never allow my child to be around heterosexuals. Also, heterosexuals should not be allowed to have children.

Why? Because studies show that most children who become gay are the children of heterosexual parents.

Here, there.

;)
 
Heterosexuals are an affront to nature and I would never let my kids near one.
 
I would never let my kids around one of those damn breeders. Sick bastards.
 
I would never allow my child to be around heterosexuals. Also, heterosexuals should not be allowed to have children.

Why? Because studies show that most children who become gay are the children of heterosexual parents.

Here, there.

;)

You win!!!
 
I would never allow my child to be around heterosexuals. Also, heterosexuals should not be allowed to have children.

Why? Because studies show that most children who become gay are the children of heterosexual parents.

Here, there.

;)

url-3.gif
 
Deja vu....
 
With that in mind, it may be more safe for our sons if we remove all heterosexual males from camps and groups like the Boy Scouts and fill them with flaming homosexuals since the former appear to be exceedingly more likely to sexually abuse young children. Do you agree? Would you send your son to camp with heterosexual men given these alarming statistics?

Only if they aren't "openly heterosexual".
 
Hope you guys aren't straining your shoulders from patting yourselves on the back...
 
According to a study from 1993 by Dr. Carole Jenny, in 82% of sexual abuse cases studied during her research, the alleged offender was a heterosexual partner of a close relative of the child. Here is a quote from the abstract:


Another study, from 1975, by Dr. Nicholas Groth studied a random group of 175 males convicted of sexual assault against children[FONT=arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif]. [/FONT]The study showed the following:


With that in mind, it may be more safe for our sons if we remove all heterosexual males from camps and groups like the Boy Scouts and fill them with flaming homosexuals since the former appear to be exceedingly more likely to sexually abuse young children. Do you agree? Would you send your son to camp with heterosexual men given these alarming statistics?

Alright, now I need to speak up for heteros. 175 isn't much of a sample size. John Wayne Gacy and Jeffrey Dahmer were most decidedly not heterosexual (but a 1975 study might be before their time). There's no question in my mind that there are many more hetero predators (and serial killers) but I'd bet that the percentages within the respective populations are similar.
 
Alright, now I need to speak up for heteros. 175 isn't much of a sample size. John Wayne Gacy and Jeffrey Dahmer were most decidedly not heterosexual (but a 1975 study might be before their time). There's no question in my mind that there are many more hetero predators (and serial killers) but I'd bet that the percentages within the respective populations are similar.

Dude.

Stop taking this thread seriously.
 
Alright, now I need to speak up for heteros. 175 isn't much of a sample size. John Wayne Gacy and Jeffrey Dahmer were most decidedly not heterosexual (but a 1975 study might be before their time). There's no question in my mind that there are many more hetero predators (and serial killers) but I'd bet that the percentages within the respective populations are similar.

Dude, srsly. That was like the most hilariously bad nonsequitor, badly assumed with no data, logical fail, non refutation ever.
 
Dude, srsly. That was like the most hilariously bad nonsequitor, badly assumed with no data, logical fail, non refutation ever.

Don't underestimate me. I'm capable of being much more non-sequitur than that. :2razz: I'm just saying that neither homosexuals nor heterosexuals are more or less likely than the other to victimize children. Is that a controversial position?
 
Last edited:
Never let kids attend school either because its possible that a teacher could molest them. In fact the only adults that souls be around kids are the ones that we trust not to molest them to keep them from molesting each other.

Being bi, one could say I am as hereto as I am homo so I don't know if I should trust myself, stay away from gay kids straight kids or all kids its like a double whammy with me.
 
I keep my children in blacked-out, hermetically sealed balls so I've nothing to worry about them being close to anyone. I only have to worry about steep hills. ;)
 
According to a study from 1993 by Dr. Carole Jenny, in 82% of sexual abuse cases studied during her research, the alleged offender was a heterosexual partner of a close relative of the child. Here is a quote from the abstract:



Another study, from 1975, by Dr. Nicholas Groth studied a random group of 175 males convicted of sexual assault against children[FONT=arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif]. [/FONT]The study showed the following:



With that in mind, it may be more safe for our sons if we remove all heterosexual males from camps and groups like the Boy Scouts and fill them with flaming homosexuals since the former appear to be exceedingly more likely to sexually abuse young children. Do you agree? Would you send your son to camp with heterosexual men given these alarming statistics?

I don't see how one could be called heterosexual if they are raping young boys... they are bisexual at least.
 
I don't see how one could be called heterosexual if they are raping young boys... they are bisexual at least.
No, you misunderstand sexuality. Pedophilia is a mental disorder which is SEPARATE from a regular sexuality like homosexuality, heterosexuality and bisexuality. Therefore, a male pedophile who abuses young boys can CERTAINLY be a heterosexual man.
 
No, you misunderstand sexuality. Pedophilia is a mental disorder which is SEPARATE from a regular sexuality like homosexuality, heterosexuality and bisexuality. Therefore, a male pedophile who abuses young boys can CERTAINLY be a heterosexual man.

I don't think I agree to be honest. I am sure a lot of people classify it the way you are. If a male is attracted to another person of the male sex, they are homosexual at least partially. Attributing sexuality to a messed up situation is messed up, but I don't think it makes it untrue.

Having a sexual partnership with little boys has gone WAAAYYY back... it was commonly accepted in Ancient Greece, you could see that if you have read any Plato. There were people then that only preferred men and the younger ones were the most desired. I think since our society is a very "straight" dominate society it screws with those kind of peoples sexuality before, where they may maintain a societal relationship with a women while secretly desiring a little innocent boy that is easily manipulated if no one is around as opposed to an adult one.. Which makes me think there is more to it than just a "mental" illness.

I would really like for you to consider what I have said. I am interested in seeing a factual retort.
 
According to a study from 1993 by Dr. Carole Jenny, in 82% of sexual abuse cases studied during her research, the alleged offender was a heterosexual partner of a close relative of the child. Here is a quote from the abstract:



Another study, from 1975, by Dr. Nicholas Groth studied a random group of 175 males convicted of sexual assault against children[FONT=arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif]. [/FONT]The study showed the following:



With that in mind, it may be more safe for our sons if we remove all heterosexual males from camps and groups like the Boy Scouts and fill them with flaming homosexuals since the former appear to be exceedingly more likely to sexually abuse young children. Do you agree? Would you send your son to camp with heterosexual men given these alarming statistics?

In fairness, I think for those parents who are concerned, its probably less about fear of sexual abuse and more about an inadvertent positive exemplification of a lifestyle before their impressionable children they honestly believe if followed will lead to negative life consequences and ultimately will displease God.
 
Last edited:
I don't think I agree to be honest. I am sure a lot of people classify it the way you are. If a male is attracted to another person of the male sex, they are homosexual at least partially.
First, this is in reference to the true definition of paedophilia; sexual attraction to pre-pubescent children. Attraction to post-pubescent children is a different issue.

Paedophiles are generally attracted to characteristics specific to pre-pubescent children - they commonly discard and move on when children they have been abusing get old and begin developing adult features. Men who abuse pre-pubescent generally express no sexual attraction to adult males and are indeed often in a relationship with an adult female (after all, a number of children are abused by their own father).

Now paedophilia is a complex concept, probably not entirely understood and there are bound to be exceptions and variations but as general principals the above applies. This is why attributing the term homosexual to a paedophile who abuses boys is flawed. Of course, the other obvious reason for avoiding such unconditional link is that this is so often a precursor to condemning homosexuals as paedophiles in general and other such idiocy. While it shouldn't be necessary to account for such things, in non-academic environments like this, it most certainly is.
 
There is a south park about this. I love how relevant that show can be on so many issues.
 
Back
Top Bottom