- Joined
- Jan 27, 2013
- Messages
- 28,820
- Reaction score
- 20,492
- Location
- Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
According to a study from 1993 by Dr. Carole Jenny, in 82% of sexual abuse cases studied during her research, the alleged offender was a heterosexual partner of a close relative of the child. Here is a quote from the abstract:
Another study, from 1975, by Dr. Nicholas Groth studied a random group of 175 males convicted of sexual assault against children[FONT=arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif]. [/FONT]The study showed the following:
With that in mind, it may be more safe for our sons if we remove all heterosexual males from camps and groups like the Boy Scouts and fill them with flaming homosexuals since the former appear to be exceedingly more likely to sexually abuse young children. Do you agree? Would you send your son to camp with heterosexual men given these alarming statistics?
Using this logic, I would presume that you will be petitioning Obama to pass laws to ensure that children are removed from their homes and families to ensure they're not abused.
After all, liberals like to use the same logic about guns. Guns are the weapon of choice for some murderers, mass or otherwise, ergo, guns must be taken from all, including law abiding citizens.
Some pedophiles prefer sexually assaulting young family members, ergo, all family members, including law abiding citizens, must be removed from contact with young children related to them.
There really is no problem with society that the American liberal can't legislate with blanket condemnation and controlled behaviour.