• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Why are there so few female mass murderers?

Why are there so few female mass murderers?


  • Total voters
    31
  • Poll closed .
to outsiders, the US does appear too be obsessed with militarism. it spends more than four times as much on the military as does china, and more than seven times as much as Russia (and everybody else is way behind that).

it also appears to be obsessed with controlling others and setting the agenda for others.

then said outsiders are being silly. the US is, in fact, the least controlling hegemon in humanity's history. Tell Ossietta about how Big Bad Ole America controls people by selling them stuff :roll:
 
Did you not read the paper I posted? None of those countries have started more wars against others during the period of time that mass murders have become such a common event in the US.

Alright. So you made the argument that America has mass murders because we were a male-dominant society, and then that point turned out to be ludicrously ignorant, so now you are arguing that we have more mass-murders because we have a global security role. :roll: Yeah, I see this argument working about as well for you as the last one did.
 
then said outsiders are being silly. the US is, in fact, the least controlling hegemon in humanity's history. Tell Ossietta about how Big Bad Ole America controls people by selling them stuff :roll:

thought that was china.
 
Alright. So you made the argument that America has mass murders because we were a male-dominant society, and then that point turned out to be ludicrously ignorant, so now you are arguing that we have more mass-murders because we have a global security role. :roll: Yeah, I see this argument working about as well for you as the last one did.


That wasn't the argument, it was "that the United States produce most of the world’s mass murderers because of a “blow back” by civilians scripting violence in a hyper-militarized America which started with the increasing military adventures after World War II."
 
Back
Top Bottom