mpg
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2005
- Messages
- 7,795
- Reaction score
- 1,784
- Location
- Milford, CT
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
You don't need any help. You're handling the situation quite well.
You don't need any help. You're handling the situation quite well.
Just like people on life support are attached to machines, both kept alive by outside sources, lets kill them all, I mean that is the liberal way, deciding who lives and who dies
C) Only for safety of mother and child.Do you think it should be legal? For what purpose?
Abortion is murder and is the most horrible act one human being can perform on another...
: the crime of unlawfully killing a person especially with malice aforethought
2
a : something very difficult or dangerous <the traffic was murder>
b : something outrageous or blameworthy <getting away with murder>
I'm just going to post this since someone always says its murder and then someone always follows it up by saying its just a legal term. It in fact has more than one definition.
I'm not defending the use of it here, but just saying the counter argument is actually incorrect.
im just going to post this changes nothing i ever said :shrug: nothing
I'm not talking to you.
So you don't see a difference between women and inanimate objects. Gotcha.
Depends on the woman, I don't see a difference in killing a kid before it is born versus killing them anytime afterward.
Then it's quite obvious there is a very serious issue where you can't differentiate between a person and a non-person.
But a pre viable fetus is not yet a person since it cannot survive outside a human womb.if it has a heartbeat it is a life
But a pre viable fetus is not yet a person since it cannot survive outside a human womb.
that is simply definition to fit a pro choice view. If that was truly the case alleged criminals that kill pregnant women would only be charged for 1 homicide instead of 2.
About 23 states have Fetal Homicide Laws.
Those laws protect the states interest in a potential person.
NO state conciders a legal abortion as a homicide.
And a liberal thinks that is ok, it goes against logic in every way.
No, it does NOT go against logic.
In fact the Roe vs.Wade decision that was made by the Surpreme Court in 1973 shows how wise The Surpreme Court was.
They allowed for states to take interest in the "potential person " ( after viability about the last trimester)
of a pregnancy as long as the woman's health/life was not at risk if the pregnancy continuted.
Early abotions were made legal in that decision.
I have had six pregnancies.
I have 4 children.
I had two miscarriages.
I was never a mother to those miscarried fetuses.
They were never children/babies/persons.
Hi Brethren,
In abortion, what God has joined together, man puts it asunder.
Our soul, man, hails from our Father God and this joins with his wife flesh in the womb of the mother and they become one person as stated in Matt.19.
So, abortion is a murder of the innocent person and the murderer get away with it. It is not fair in society who are in God but in Mammon, there are no norms and people do whatever they like. Have you come across abortions in a country where Mammon is not worshipped? No.
If you want a healthy respect for life, we probably shouldn't view having a baby as a consequence.