- Joined
- Mar 20, 2011
- Messages
- 10,090
- Reaction score
- 5,056
- Location
- wny
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
I see this as a needed incentive to make us less dependent on oil. The oil companies get subsidies from the government despite record breaking profits. I see THAT as corporate welfare.
I'm stating that maintaining the status quo of Big Energy is two steps backwards, whether it is fossil fuel entering the Energy Distribution Network and collecting its proportionate share or Lockheed Martin making sure that it doesn't change to a De-Centralized Distribution Network. Why don't people realize that our distribution network is as much a problem to Global Warming as fossil fuels. The inertia generated attempting to dis-lodge the status quo of Big Money is considerable. After all, who owns the politicians? How many do you own? That is where I see this struggle and it seems truly important to me. Ergo, you get may rants, although I try to be logical and thoughtful and produce insight from many years ofd solar research. That research tells me that the status quo is the problem and offers no hope for a solution. I always go out on a limb and offer a solution. Otherwise, I would just be bitching.