• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Why are the Dems NOW pushing for severe restrictions upon lawful gun owners

WHy Are the Dems now Pushing Severe Gun Restrictions

  • Because of the School Massacre

    Votes: 24 45.3%

  • Because Obama didn't want to lose the last election

    Votes: 13 24.5%

  • Because the dems want to stick it to pro gun groups

    Votes: 13 24.5%

  • Because the dems want to distract from the financial mess

    Votes: 18 34.0%

  • Because they actually think it will decrease crime

    Votes: 22 41.5%

  • Oher

    Votes: 12 22.6%
  • Total voters
    53
guards or better yet armed anonymous staff members, are far better choice than trying to ban the guns of honest people pretending that such bans are going to stop people planning to commit capital murder
 
Surtr said:
The NRA does more harm than good.
Click to expand...
Says you. I disagree.....
With each stupid stunt they pull, they strengthen the other side.
Click to expand...
What "stunts" are these? Or are we allowed to just throw general terms out?
I support gun rights in this country, and the right for every American to continue to own a firearm long after I'm dead and buried, which is why I can never support the NRA. Partisan politics is not the way to protect rights, but it's a fine way to destroy them.
Click to expand...

Sure... Okay.... Whatever you say........
 
They think it will decrease crime, but it wont. People will get their guns one way or another.
 
Catawba said:
"Mother Jones has made a persuasive case that arming civilians does little to stop mass shooters, and even cops can't stop every shooting. Columbine High School had an armed security officer on campus at the time of the 1999 shooting that killed 13 people. He even exchanged gunfire with one of the killers. Neither one of them was hit."

Fact-Checking the NRA Press Conference - National - The Atlantic Wire
Click to expand...

MOTHER JONES Only Reviews Mass Slaughter In 'GUN FREE ZONES'
With 4 Killings Or More

Mother Jones Inadvertantly Makes A Good Case For Banning Gun Free Zones
AND What Makes Concealed Carry Effective Against Violent Crime

Re-Read The Article With That Perspective
See What Ya Think
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom