• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Gun Control

Would you support more restrictions on guns if they had the potential to save lives?

  • Yes

    Votes: 59 39.9%
  • No

    Votes: 74 50.0%
  • Others

    Votes: 15 10.1%

  • Total voters
    148
you again prove you really know nothing about this matter

You mean by providing documentation as opposed to opinion from gun nuts!
 
You mean by providing documentation as opposed to opinion from gun nuts!

the only real gun nuts are the fanatic haters of conservative gun owners who have no clue about what they rant about and their only goal is to harass gun owners.

tell me catawba, what is your experience with firearms
 
tell me catawba, what is your experience with firearms


470_2560104.jpg
 
so tell me Haymarket-do you think civilians who are not employed as civilian police officers ought to be able to own 17 shot pistols are 20 shot semi auto carbines

Your premise is both false and and an oxymoron. One cannot be a civilian police officer.
 


yeah I sort of figured a stupid and emotobabbling response.

but that explains the almost consistently irrational arguments you make
 
Your premise is both false and and an oxymoron. One cannot be a civilian police officer.

well call up the US attorney and ask her. She is the chief law enforcement officer for the federal government in your judicial district

I know what Mine would say-and yours will say the same thing
 
but that explains the almost consistently irrational arguments you make

Yes, it certainly does show that I care more about human life than saving you a few bucks at the target range.
 
Yes, it certainly does show that I care more about human life than saving you a few bucks at the target range.

its a false choice based on the usual dishonesty displayed in your pretextual and lie filled posts
 
Yes, it certainly does show that I care more about human life than saving you a few bucks at the target range.

Give it up Catawba. You are outclassed here.
 
Give it up Catawba. You are outclassed here.

HIs failure is that I am honest about my motivations and catawba is trying to pretend that his suggestions are designed to make society safer when his real goal is to harass honest gun owners for not believing in the far left anti capitalist (and in many cases anti law and order) agenda he lives for
 
How so? He has failed in every argument?

LOL, I think he was pointing out that your posts are both dishonest and fail to demonstrate any understanding of the subject matter. You admitted your only experience with firearms was an emotionally driven hatred based on blaming firearms for deaths
 
LOL, I think he was pointing out that your posts are both dishonest and fail to demonstrate any understanding of the subject matter. You admitted your only experience with firearms was an emotionally driven hatred based on blaming firearms for deaths

You are lying. Otherwise you could produce a quote where I have ever said that.
 
You are lying. Otherwise you could produce a quote where I have ever said that.

Its obvious. when I asked you your experience with firearms all you posted was what appeared to be a memorial to shooting victims.

and yes, your posts clearly demonstrate your goal is to harass honest citizens who owne guns.
 
Its obvious. when I asked you your experience with firearms all you posted was what appeared to be a memorial to shooting victims.

and yes, your posts clearly demonstrate your goal is to harass honest citizens who owne guns.

I forgot you have no understanding of human empathy. And btw, I own guns.
 
I forgot you have no understanding of human empathy. And btw, I own guns.

yeah sure you do

human empathy is not something you are able to define about others. I don't think stripping law abiding people of their rights shows anything more than disgusting fascist tendencies
 
yeah sure you do

human empathy is not something you are able to define about others. I don't think stripping law abiding people of their rights shows anything more than disgusting fascist tendencies

No one is stripping anyone of their rights, if that were the case the USSC would have overturned the 1994 ban.
 
How about shotguns, do they count?

Airsoft shotguns do not count, lol.

Honestly your single or pump shotgun is a good weapon. If this is the case, why do you display almost no knowledge of firearms at all? I mean really even basic concepts? Serious questions, not making fun of you.
 
Airsoft shotguns do not count, lol.

Honestly your single or pump shotgun is a good weapon. If this is the case, why do you display almost no knowledge of firearms at all? I mean really even basic concepts? Serious questions, not making fun of you.

You skipped a step. You haven't yet proven I was incorrect.
 
Airsoft shotguns do not count, lol.

Honestly your single or pump shotgun is a good weapon. If this is the case, why do you display almost no knowledge of firearms at all? I mean really even basic concepts? Serious questions, not making fun of you.

Alternating your load AxBxAxB medium spread pellets for hallway coverage and high velocity, high density slugs for accuracy + knock back. I dont care if that crazie is wearing body armor that slug is going to do something, especially if you hit him in the head or a joint.
 
Back
Top Bottom