• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Are civil unions an acceptable compromise for SSM?[W:237]

Are civil unions an acceptable compromise for SSM?

  • Yes, civil unions are an acceptable compromise.

    Votes: 17 17.2%

  • No, they are not, because:

    Votes: 51 51.5%

  • The government should not be involved with marriage, at all.

    Votes: 23 23.2%

  • Other (Please Explain)

    Votes: 8 8.1%
  • Total voters
    99
ThePlayDrive said:
Whatever. It's time for you to consider that you, not other people, are the root of your problems in SSM threads.
Click to expand...

I think its more like its time for you to accept that you are one of the biggest flamers in SSM threads and you always have been...its much to late for you to claim to be the victim...and you attempting to put this on me has been in every post about this from day one.
Im sorry that many on this forum find my having the balls to be upfront and state clearly how I feel as an attack on them but I make no apology
 
lpast said:
Bummer. You do not have a right not to be offended. It is not gay people's fault you are acting on irrational emotions. You should accept responsibility for your own emotional reactions.

Since I dont have a "RIGHT" to anything...please just go re read my post # 169
Click to expand...

Why are you avoiding the question? It is not a hard one to answer.
 
CLAX1911 said:
You are going to deny rights to people because of loud mouths? I understand your distaste for the counter culture, I finds them distasteful. But to use them to ruin or chances for more rights is really not logical. I don't necessarily respect people who are against ssm but I don't think their rights to disagree with itshould be suspended.

But you want to punish heterosexual loud mouths by restricting my rights, I ask you to reconsider your position, understanding who really wins, my boyfriend and I and others similar to us, the poisonous will pic the next thing to jump in your face about either way.
Click to expand...


Clax im not trying to ruin anything for anyone...that thought does not motivate me. Its like any other issue with two sides...there are those on one side and those on the other..
 
Redress said:
Why are you avoiding the question? It is not a hard one to answer.
Click to expand...

You have already answered it for me redress, you have your answer
 
lpast said:
I think its more like its time for you to accept that you are one of the biggest flamers in SSM threads and you always have been...its much to late for you to claim to be the victim...and you attempting to put this on me has been in every post about this from day one.
Im sorry that many on this forum find my having the balls to be upfront and state clearly how I feel as an attack on them but I make no apology
Click to expand...
Where did I claim to be a victim? Answer: I did not.

This is the problem with how you act in SSM threads. You see things that aren't there and then get upset about them.

And no, I'm not a "flamer" in SSM threads. I have opinions. Some of those opinions upset people like you and instead of just accepting that my opinions upset you, you attribute your reaction to me being purposely inflammatory.
 
lpast said:
Clax im not trying to ruin anything for anyone...that thought does not motivate me. Its like any other issue with two sides...there are those on one side and those on the other..
Click to expand...

But your reason to restrict liberty is that somebody has to disagree?

I fail to understand
 
ThePlayDrive said:
Where did I claim to be a victim? Answer: I did not.

This is the problem with how you act in SSM threads. You see things that aren't there and then get upset about them.

And no, I'm not a "flamer" in SSM threads. I have opinions. Some of those opinions upset people like you and instead of just accepting that my opinions upset you, you attribute your reaction to me being purposely inflammatory.
Click to expand...

haha..amazing...read your last two lines that remember that next time you ACCUSE me of being vitriolic and a flamer...which you did in your last line....Lmao...
 
CLAX1911 said:
But your reason to restrict liberty is that somebody has to disagree?

I fail to understand
Click to expand...


I do not have the ability to make it simpler so you can understand.
 
lpast said:
I do not have the ability to make it simpler so you can understand.
Click to expand...

So you motivation to restrict rights, in effect continue to oppress a minority is because you simply wish to be contrary to something? Why not pick abortion?
 
lpast said:
You have already answered it for me redress, you have your answer
Click to expand...

Why do you continue to run away from defending your own words?
 
lpast said:
haha..amazing...read your last two lines that remember that next time you ACCUSE me of being vitriolic and a flamer...which you did in your last line....Lmao...
Click to expand...
Meh, you're just doing what I said you do. Instead of taking responsibility for your reaction to my opinion, you accuse me of trying to upset you. /shrug

Take responsibility for your behavior.
 
CLAX1911 said:
So you motivation to restrict rights, in effect continue to oppress a minority is because you simply wish to be contrary to something? Why not pick abortion?
Click to expand...

Yes..and just for clarification so theres no fuzzy area...Im homophobic and a bigot :)
 
ThePlayDrive said:
Meh, you're just doing what I said you do. Instead of taking responsibility for your reaction to my opinion, you accuse me of trying to upset you. /shrug

Take responsibility for your behavior.
Click to expand...


I dont understand
 
Redress said:
Why do you continue to run away from defending your own words?
Click to expand...

Im a punk ? im scared of gays ? oh I know what it is...Im just trying to hide how deeply I hate gays and how afraid I am of them....just hate me for it...Im ok with that :)
 
lpast said:
Yes..and just for clarification so theres no fuzzy area...Im homophobic and a bigot :)
Click to expand...
Do you realize that nobody (that I've seen) has said that, but you? For goodness sake, dude. You're being your own worst enemy here.
 
lpast said:
Im a punk ? im scared of gays ? oh I know what it is...Im just trying to hide how deeply I hate gays and how afraid I am of them....just hate me for it...Im ok with that :)
Click to expand...

You still have not explained how SSM will fundamentally change marriage. Why can't you answer the question?
 
CLAX1911 said:
I will not go away, you say one thing and them another, I just am tying to understand which is which
Click to expand...

ROFLMAO...oh you are going away and right now...OMG clax you truly made my day...lol
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom