• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

End United States Discrimination against the world?

Should the United States grant equal rights to others of the world?


  • Total voters
    30
Μολὼν λαβέ;1061124542 said:
Like the "few" people who killed Americans in Benghazi? :lamo

Whats that got to do with this subject? I don't recall even talking about what happened in Benghazi much less taking some sort of stance that you seem to be attributing to me? Which seems to be a stance that the few who perpetrated the attacks against the Embassy was the whole of the Muslim world?

Perhaps you're thinking of someone else?
 
Yeah well, I don't think it would be worth the headaches and the money. I would rather tighten up on laws against employers who hire them, demand that OUR government start being responsible for following and enforcing our illegal immigration laws, etc. We have states in this country (mine is one of them) who are sanctuary states, as I'm sure you know, so we haven't exactly been "cracking down" on them. We should probably try that first IMO.

It's free property for industrialization, worked by people we don't have to give any benefits to. It pays for itself in the long term, as long as we protect those assets. With the border as wide as it is, there's no way to just close it off and prevent illegals from entering, giving them real jobs and eliminating the cartels provides incentive for them to stay, and the ones here to go back.
 
We should create goodwill with Mexico since we are going to be sneaking across the Rio Grande looking for work there before too long.....
 
So is it your position that even the legal immigrants are an invasion?
Historically, a territory was invaded and occupied until it established a nationality of its own. Then it shut its doors. The majority of Americans didn't want these foreigners coming here, therefore they are all illegal. Consent of the governed was never given. Multiculturalist laws are invalid.
 
Historically, a territory was invaded and occupied until it established a nationality of its own. Then it shut its doors. The majority of Americans didn't want these foreigners coming here, therefore they are all illegal. Consent of the governed was never given. Multiculturalist laws are invalid.

What 1st world nation has shut it's doors? As far as I know countries like Britain, France, Spain even Canada and Mexico all have immigration laws. The inflow might be very restricted, but the doors are not shut. In addition, the consent of the governed was indeed given by the representatives chosen. By electing and re-electing these representatives, the consent of the governed is given. Please explain how multiculturalist laws are invalid.
 
What 1st world nation has shut it's doors? As far as I know countries like Britain, France, Spain even Canada and Mexico all have immigration laws. The inflow might be very restricted, but the doors are not shut. In addition, the consent of the governed was indeed given by the representatives chosen. By electing and re-electing these representatives, the consent of the governed is given. Please explain how multiculturalist laws are invalid.
Everybody knows that representative government often goes against the will of the people who voted in the representatives. It is not a proxy government, as it must be to have any validity. In the present arrogant self-interpretation by the illegitimate ruling class, the people are the proxies who have to do what the pre-owned government bosses think is best for them.

The present treason to the people by all governments that practice this undeserved privilege is the result of a false idea of what consent means. If they had asked the voters about immigration, the voters would have overwhelmingly said no. That means no consent. If they continue to go off on their own, we must change to having national referenda on all issues where we can't trust them to understand what consent means. It is about time that we put the politicians in their place. If they continue to do what, in their ignorant or conceited or bribed minds, they think is best for us, we will be put down, down, down, racing to the bottom. In this contradiction of self-government we are saddled with now, only the persons of the representatives are allowed to be voted on, not their policies. They should merely be doing a stenographer's work, taking our dictation of what the policies of these persons should be. Their present self-appointed overreaching of their assigned role to be obedient to our will in all cases makes this system an abuse of power and therefore invalid in the cases where we would have voted against the selfish wishes of those who are supposed to be our servants.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom