Presidential Election: Who are you voting for or might/could you vote for?

Will be voting for Gary Johnson in the morning along with my wife. Mother and SIL already voted for him.

DVSentinel said:

Romney is the only candidate available that might be able to defeat Obama. Some other candidates may be more desirable if I knew their whole platform, but defeating Obama has to take priority and since they cannot do it, I must go for Romney.

I will Vote for only a single Incumbent. My Representative, I would even vote against him if the opposing candidates resume didn't read like a how-to to become a welfare liberal. A more moderate Dem would of gotten my vote, but one didn't volunteer to run. The libertarian candidate didn't campaign that I saw and I have not found any information concerning him, other than a name that is supposedly running.

Click to expand...

why is defeating obama such a priority? the house republicans can, and have shown that they will, block anything he tries to do. so, why does he need to be defeated, he's already impotent thanks to the right.

I voted for Mitt Romney last week.

DaveFagan said:

Am I conservative enough to want to protect the environment that nourishes us as a species. Yes! That's anti Republican. Am I a tree hugger. Hell, yes, I told you I'm a Green. Do I want to see the power and influence of Corporations in the USA restrained. Yes! That's anti Republican and anti Plutocracy and anti Oligarchy! Republicans are a radical and I repeat, RADICAL, pro Corporate ideology dedicated to protecting the status quo of Big Money, like "let's give the tax breaks to the wealthy and they will do good things for the needs of the general populace." Yeh! Like maybe buying an island off Aruba to escape the squalor. I seek a nice balanced conservative policy that benefits all, today and tomorrow. Not short-sighted and radical protectionism, war, pollution, and poverty that is endemic to Republican politics. I'm pretty damned Conservative.

Click to expand...

Are you liberal enough to want to put the environut agenda ahead of humanity? Yes! Are you a moonbat? Hell, yes! You told me you were green, and nobody is disputing that. Do you want to see the Government bury the Private Sector? Yes! That's pro-Marxist and exciting as hell for you. Democrats are a radical, and I repeat, RADICAL, pro-government ideology dedicated to protecting the status quo of liberal elitists, like "let's beat the hell out of certain of the wealthy and we will redistribute their increase to the poor." Like maybe tapping anyone who earns over $150K per year. You seek a nice, balanced liberal policy that takes from the rich and redistributes to the poor. You are a liberal, and I want you to be proud of that fact.

You're shilling for the DNC in the guise of conservatism, Dave, and nobody buys it.

roflpublican said:

why is defeating obama such a priority? the house republicans can, and have shown that they will, block anything he tries to do. so, why does he need to be defeated, he's already impotent thanks to the right.

Click to expand...

because we don't want two more hard left justices on the court which might be enough to get rid of gun rights (among other things)

"Are you liberal enough to want to put the environut agenda ahead of humanity? Yes! Are you a moonbat? Hell, yes! You told me you were green, and nobody is disputing that. Do you want to see the Government bury the Private Sector? Yes! That's pro-Marxist and exciting as hell for you. Democrats are a radical, and I repeat, RADICAL, pro-government ideology dedicated to protecting the status quo of liberal elitists, like "let's beat the hell out of certain of the wealthy and we will redistribute their increase to the poor." Like maybe tapping anyone who earns over $150K per year. You seek a nice, balanced liberal policy that takes from the rich and redistributes to the poor. You are a liberal, and I want you to be proud of that fact.

You're shilling for the DNC in the guise of conservatism, Dave, and nobody buys it."""


I do not want to protect liberal elitists. I don't want to see the private sector buried. Although some very big "too big to fail" banks could go. I don't want to take from the rich, I want to stop giving to the rich. I'm not a Democrat, I'm a Green. If you don't know what a Green, that is your lack of knowledge.

I woud want to vote for Jill Stein if the Green Party actually had a chance (that goes into reforming our electoral two party system all together, which is another debate for another time), but im voting for Obama.
However saying that my left wing socialistic vote does not matter in Kansas.

Dooble said:

Are you liberal enough to want to put the environut agenda ahead of humanity? Yes! Are you a moonbat? Hell, yes! You told me you were green, and nobody is disputing that. Do you want to see the Government bury the Private Sector? Yes! That's pro-Marxist and exciting as hell for you. Democrats are a radical, and I repeat, RADICAL, pro-government ideology dedicated to protecting the status quo of liberal elitists, like "let's beat the hell out of certain of the wealthy and we will redistribute their increase to the poor." Like maybe tapping anyone who earns over $150K per year. You seek a nice, balanced liberal policy that takes from the rich and redistributes to the poor. You are a liberal, and I want you to be proud of that fact.

You're shilling for the DNC in the guise of conservatism, Dave, and nobody buys it.

Click to expand...

"Are you liberal enough to want to put the environut agenda ahead of humanity?"

The "environut agenda" is an agenda to support humanity. It is the only agenda in support of humanity. The private sector is, for the most part, Corporate, ergo does not live and breathe. That live and breathe is a requirement for humanity. You might ponder that for a spell.